Journals / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

A Comparative MCDM Analysis of Potential Short-Term Measures for Dealing with Mucilage Problem in the Sea of Marmara

Pages
572–580
Publication Date
2021-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The phenomenon attracts increasing attention as it severely impacts the overall ecology, particularly benthic creatures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mucilage is a dense and highly viscous substance made up of extracellular polysaccharides produced and secreted by the overgrowth of various aquatic species.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By mid-2020, the Sea of Marmara was covered with mucilage that threatens marine life, tourism, fisheries and the economy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The phenomenon attracts increasing attention as it severely impacts the overall ecology, particularly benthic creatures.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Mucilage · Multi Criteria Decision Making · the Sea of Marmara

Abstract

Mucilage is a dense and highly viscous substance made up of extracellular polysaccharides produced and secreted by the overgrowth of various aquatic species. Rising ocean temperatures, as well as human-induced stressors like inadequate treatment levels and overfishing, are common causes of such algal blooms. By mid-2020, the Sea of Marmara was covered with mucilage that threatens marine life, tourism, fisheries and the economy. Even though this was not the first mucilage outbreak in the Sea of Marmara and was not a region-specific occurrence, it was one of the worst. The phenomenon attracts increasing attention as it severely impacts the overall ecology, particularly benthic creatures. This study aims to evaluate the short-term strategies that can be used to control mucilage in the Marmara Sea according to environmental, economic, technological, technical and social criteria. It is important to note that although integrating conventional treatment plants with advanced nutrient treatment technologies is the long-term and ultimate solution to the issue, this study focuses only on short-term measures to control a mucilage outbreak in the Sea of Marmara. Fuzzy Theory is used to analyze data obtained from experts from various sectors using two separate Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) models: Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The results indicate that stopping fishing is the best alternative, whereas collecting mucilage on the surface is the second-best preferable by two methods (F-TOPSIS, F-PROMETHEE). According to experts, the third option is to use beneficial bacteria to eliminate mucilage, while reactive oxygen dosing is the least appealing option.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAVUN-HEKİMOĞLU, B., ERBAY, B., BURAK, Z. S., GAZİOĞLU, C. (2021). A Comparative MCDM Analysis of Potential Short-Term Measures for Dealing with Mucilage Problem in the Sea of Marmara. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 572–580. https://ajindex.com/articles/672542

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Aksu, A., Taşkın, Ö.S., Çağlar, N. (2021). Müsilajın Çevresel Şartlarda Değişen Kimyasal Karakterizasyonu. Marmara Denizi'nin Ekolojisi: Deniz Salyası Oluşumu, Etkileşimleri ve Çözüm Önerileri. Türkiye Bİlimler Akademisi. Altıok, Η., & Kayişoğlu, M. (2015). Seasonal and interannual variability of water exchange in the Strait of Istanbul. Mediterranean Marine Science, 16(3), 644-655.
  2. Balkis-Ozdelice, N., Durmus, T., Toklu-Alicli, B., & Balci, M. (2020). Phytoplankton composition related to the environmental conditions in the coastal waters of the Gulf of Erdek. Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2010). PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European journal of Operational research, 200(1), 198-215.
  3. Bianchi, G. (1746). Notizie sulla vasta fioritura algale del 1729. Raccolta d'opuscoli scientifici e filologici, 34, 256–257.
  4. Burak, S., Bilge, A. H., & Ülker, D. (2021). Assessment and simulation of water transfer for the megacity Istanbul. Physical Geography, 1-25.
  5. Cambrainha, G. M., & Fontana, M. E. (2018). A multi-criteria decision making approach to balance water supply-demand strategies in water supply systems. Production, 28. Coban, A., Ertis, I. F., & Cavdaroglu, N. A. (2018). Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: A case study in Istanbul, Turkey. Journal of cleaner production, 180, 159-167.
  6. Cozzi, S., Ivančić, I., Catalano, G., Djakovac, T., & Degobbis, D. (2004). Dynamics of the oceanographic properties during mucilage appearance in the Northern Adriatic Sea: analysis of the 1997 event in comparison to earlier events. Journal of Marine Systems, 50(3-4), 223-241.
  7. Danovaro, R., Umani, S. F., & Pusceddu, A. (2009). Climate change and the potential spreading of marine mucilage and microbial pathogens in the Mediterranean Sea. PLoS One, 4(9), e7006. Del Negro, P., Crevatin, E., Larato, C., Ferrari, C., Totti, C., Pompei, M.,. & Umani, S. F. (2005). Mucilage microcosms. Science of the Total Environment, 353(1-3), 258-269.
  8. Ergül, H. A., Balkis-Ozdelice, N., Koral, M., Aksan, S., Durmus, T., Kaya, M., Kayal, M., Ekmekci, F., Canli, O. (2021). The early stage of mucilage formation in the Marmara Sea during spring 2021. Journal of the Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment, 27(2) 232-257.
  9. Funari, E., & Ade, P. (1999). Human health implications associated with mucilage in the northern Adriatic Sea. Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanità, 35(3), 421-425. Gia