SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Ecosystem Based Management Approach for Sea Water Management: Existing Situation in Turkey

Ömer EYÜBOĞLU
Huri EYUBOGLU
Pages
146–160
Publication Date
2022-06-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall aim of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) is to achieve or maintain Good Environmental Status (GES) within the marine environment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The overall aim of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) is to achieve or maintain Good Environmental Status (GES) within the marine environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Turkey is in the process of using/developing an Ecosystems-Based Management approach for governance of its marine waters, based on the European Union (EU) Marine Strategy Framework Directive.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:One of the key priority elements for a successful implementation of the MSFD is the establishment of an effective framework for coordination and cooperation among national, regional and local authorities.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ecosystem Approach · Marine Strategy Framework Directive · Regional Seas Conventions

Abstract

The overall aim of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) is to achieve or maintain Good Environmental Status (GES) within the marine environment. Turkey is in the process of using/developing an Ecosystems-Based Management approach for governance of its marine waters, based on the European Union (EU) Marine Strategy Framework Directive. The legislative history, conceptual approach, structure and content of the Directive, as well as some of its unique regulatory features are discussed here. The implementation of the MSFD represents a demanding task in the integrative assessment of marine ecosystems. Here we describe the implementation process, and we discuss the institutional framework and the main difficulties and challenges encountered so far, with emphasis on the Turkey context. This paper will provide a review of the existing institutional and legislative structure in Turkey relevant to the future implementation of the MSFD. Over the years Turkey has developed a robust body of Environment Law in general and a complicated institutional structure. One of the key priority elements for a successful implementation of the MSFD is the establishment of an effective framework for coordination and cooperation among national, regional and local authorities.

🔖

Cite This Article

EYÜBOĞLU, Ö., EYUBOGLU, H. (2022). Ecosystem Based Management Approach for Sea Water Management: Existing Situation in Turkey. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 146–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/672514

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Atkins, J.P., Burdon, D., Elliott, M., Gregory, A.J. (2011). Management of the marine environment: integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62(2), 215-226.
  2. Avaz, G. (2017). Updating the National Action Plan for Protecting Marine Environment Against Land Based Sources Project. CTUE 5168703,Report No. CTUE. 13.155(Final Report).December 2017,
  3. Gebze-Kocaeli. Barnes R., Metcalf D. (2010). Current Legal Developments – The European Union: The Marine Strategy Framework Directive. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 25 (1), 81-91. Başak Dessane, E. (2017): Benefits and Costs of Environmental and Natural Resources- Examples from Turkey, Workshop on Economic and Social Analysis and Programmes of Measures in accordance with the MSFD: 10–14 July 2017,
  4. Bolu. Beken, C. (2017): How marine monitoring is divided between different institutions, Workshop on Environmental Targets and Monitoring requirements of the MSFD: 22-26 May 2017,
  5. Bodrum, Muğla. Beken, C., Aydöner, C., Ediger, D., Hüsrevoğlu, S., Mantıkçı, M., Aydöner, C., Olgun, A., Sözer, B., Tan, İ., Karakoç, F.,Tolun,L., Tutak, B., Tüfekçi, H., Tüfekçi, V.( 2014). Marine and Coastal Waters Quality Determination and Classification Project (DeKoS Project). CTUE 5118703, Report No. CTUE.13.155 (Final Report), February 2014,
  6. Gebze-Kocaeli. Beken, C., Kıdeyş, A., Beşiktepe,S., Yüksek, A. (2013). Good Environmental Status of Definition and Goals in Turkey Marines. -Coastal Management in Turkey: Recent Developments in National Workshop, 17 May 2013,
  7. Marmaris, Muğla. Bellas,J.(2014). The implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Shortcomings and limitations from the Spanish point of view. Marine Policy, 50(1), 10-17.
  8. Berg, T., Fürhaupter, K., Teixeria, H., Uusitalo,L., Zampoukas,N. (2015). The Marine Strategy Framework Directive and the ecosystem-based approach – pitfalls and solutions, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 96(1-2), 18-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.04.050. Bertrama, C., Dworak,T., Görlitz, S., Interwies, E., Rehdanz, K. (2014). Cost-benefit analysis in the context of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive: The case of Germany. Marine Policy, 43,307-312.
  9. Borja, A., Elliott, M., Carstensen, J., Heiskanen,A.S., Bund,W. ( 2010). Marine management – Towards an integrated implementation of the European Marine Strategy Framework and the Water Framework Directives. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60(12), 217