SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hitit ilahiyat dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 23

Social Capital and Religion: On the Effects of Social Capital in Intra-Group Cooperation and Coordination

Sosyal Sermaye ve Din: Sosyal Sermayenin Grup İçi İşbirliği ve Eşgüdüme Etkisi Üzerine

Sefer YAVUZ
Pages
43–76
Publication Date
2013-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

And then we put forward an empirical essay about ?effects on the social capital about the intra-group coordinated attitudes and behaviors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Social capital is defined as the network of the shared norms, values and understandings within the group.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Based on this definition, it is asserted that social capital leads to common thoughts and opinions, cooperation, coordinated behaviors and attitudes, also it is enhances the under-standing of the common good in the group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:And then we put forward an empirical essay about ?effects on the social capital about the intra-group coordinated attitudes and behaviors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal sermaye · din · dini grup

Abstract

Social capital is defined as the network of the shared norms, values and understandings within the group. Based on this definition, it is asserted that social capital leads to common thoughts and opinions, cooperation, coordinated behaviors and attitudes, also it is enhances the under-standing of the common good in the group. It can be take into account, undoubtedly, the effects of the many factors in producing of the social capital. But we deal with in this article, the relations between the social capital and religion. And then we put forward an empirical essay about ?effects on the social capital about the intra-group coordinated attitudes and behaviors.

Özet

Sosyal sermaye, grup içi ortak normlar, değerler ve anlayışlar ağı olarak da tanımlanır. Bu tanıma göre grup içi ortak düşünce ve kanaatlere, işbirliğine, eşgüdümlü tutum ve davranışlara yol açacağı, ayrıca ortak fayda anlayışını geliştireceği ileri sürülür. Sosyal sermayenin üretilmesinde şüphesiz pek çok faktörün etkisinden bahsedilebilir. Ancak biz bu çalışmada sosyal sermaye-din ilişkisi üzerinde duracağız. Konunun kavramsal analizinden sonra sosyal semayenin grup içi eşgüdümlü tutum ve davranışlara etkisiyle ilgili ampirik bir deneme sunacağız.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAVUZ, S. (2013). Social Capital and Religion: On the Effects of Social Capital in Intra-Group Cooperation and Coordination. Hitit ilahiyat dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 23, 43–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/671357

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Akdoğan, Argun “Siyasal Kültür ve Sosyal Sermayenin Karşılaştırılması: Türkiye İçin Bazı Çıkar- samalar”, Akdeniz Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari BilimlerFakültesi Dergisi, Antalya, 2006, c.ilt:: 6, Sayı: 12, ss. 162-187.
  2. Allık, Jüri ve Realo, Anu, “Individualism-Collectivism and Social Capital” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, SAGE, 2004, c. 35, sayı: 29, ss. 29-49.
  3. Altay, Asuman, “Bir Kamu Malı Olarak Sosyal Sermaye ve Yoksulluk İlişkisi, Ege Akademik Bakış, İzmir, 2007, c. 7, sayı: 1, ss. 337-362.
  4. Anık, Mehmet, “Sosyal Sermaye Kavramı Işığında Ziya Gökalp’in Düşünceleri Üzerine Bir Değer- lendirme”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Eskişehir, 2011, c. 12, sayı: 2, ss. 89-103.
  5. Annette, John “Faith Communities, Communitarianism, Social Capital and Youth Civic Enga- gement”, Ethnicities, SAGE, 2011, c. 11, sayı: 3, ss. 383-397.
  6. Ardahan, Faik, “Sosyal Sermaye Ölçeği, Geçerlilik, Güvenirlilik Çalışması”, International Journal of Human Sciences, c. 9, sayı: 2, ss. 773-789.
  7. Aşkar, Mustafa Niyazî-i Mısrî ve Tasavvuf Anlayışı, Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları, Ankara, 1998.
  8. Aydın, Ferit, Tarikatta Rabıta ve Nakşibendilik, Ekin Yayınları, İstanbul, 1996.
  9. Baker, Chris ve Miles-Watson, Jonathan, “Faith and Traditional Capitals: Defining the Public Scope of Spiritual and Religious Capital—A Literature Review”, Equinox Publishing, Londra, 2010.
  10. Bourdieu, Pierre, “The forms of capital” Handbook Of Theory And Research For The Sociology Of Edu- cation, (edit. J. G. Richardson), New York, 1986, ss. 241-258.
  11. Bunn, Christopher ve Wood, Matthew, “Cultured responses: The production of social capital in faith based organizations”, Current Sociology, SAGE, 2012, c. 60, sayı: 5, ss. 636-652.
  12. Cebecioğlu, Ethem Tasavvuf Terimleri ve Deyimleri Sözlüğü, Rehber Yayınları, Ankara, 1997.
  13. Chakrabarti, Debjani, Economic Freedom and Social Capital Determinants on Economic Growth Of Deve- loped and Developing Nations, Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, Mississippi State University, 2007.
  14. Cheong, Pauline Hope, Edwards, Rosalind, Goulbourne, Harry ve Solomos, John. “Immigration, social cohesion and social capital: A critical review”, Critical Social Policy, SAGE, 2007, c. 27, sayı: 24, ss. 24-49.
  15. Coleman, James “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”, Education, Culture, Economy and Society, A.H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown ve A.S. Wells (edit.), Oxford University Press, 1997, ss. 24-41.
  16. Cook, Karen Schweers, “Networks, Norms, and Trust: The Social Psychology of Social C