Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 1999 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

DIFFERENT POSITIONS CONCERNING THE MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONIN THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS AND THE DIŞTINCTIVE PLACE OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT IN THE SPECTRUM OF THESE POSITIONS

Pages
125–168
Publication Date
1999-07-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A "general public management approach", which can be developed from positions (ili), (iv) and (v) by integrating the contributions of politics, public law, economics and management, Will be a new and enriched approach to the stüdy and practice ofthe public sector, However, it should be kept İn mind that this approach is only a promisıng direction rather than a full panacea or a miraculous elixir for all problems of the pub[ic sector.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There has been a profusion of approaches and then confusion in describing the stüdy and practice of management in the public sector.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The similarities and differences between organisations and management functions in the public and private sectors are a constant source of conroversy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A "general public management approach", which can be developed from positions (ili), (iv) and (v) by integrating the contributions of politics, public law, economics and management, Will be a new and enriched approach to the stüdy and practice ofthe public sector, However, it should be kept İn mind that this approach is only a promisıng direction rather than a full panacea or a miraculous elixir for all problems of the pub[ic sector.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Traditional public administration · public management · the new public management

Özet

There has been a profusion of approaches and then confusion in describing the stüdy and practice of management in the public sector. The similarities and differences between organisations and management functions in the public and private sectors are a constant source of conroversy. What does management mean in the public sector? What makes public management new and different? In this study we have developed eight different positions conceming the similarities and differences between management âınctions in both sectors: (ü) public adminisration iş unique; (fi) pubiic adminİstratİon and private (business) management are alike in unimponant respects; (iii) there is a unique management for the public domain; (iv) public management is an integative paradigm; (v) the new public management (NPM) is a new paradigm; (vii) there is a convergence between public management and private management; (vii) management is generic; (viii) public management is only a less efficientform of private (business)management. A "general public management approach", which can be developed from positions (ili), (iv) and (v) by integrating the contributions of politics, public law, economics and management, Will be a new and enriched approach to the stüdy and practice ofthe public sector, However, it should be kept İn mind that this approach is only a promisıng direction rather than a full panacea or a miraculous elixir for all problems of the pub[ic sector.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖMÜRGÖNÜLŞEN, U. (1999). DIFFERENT POSITIONS CONCERNING THE MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONIN THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS AND THE DIŞTINCTIVE PLACE OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT IN THE SPECTRUM OF THESE POSITIONS. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 125–168. https://ajindex.com/articles/670566

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. ALLISON, Jr. G, T. (1983), “PubIic and Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike in All Unimportant Respects?" in J. L, Perry and K. L. Kraemer (eds.), Public Management: Public and Private Perspectives, (Palo Alto: Cal.: Mayfield). (This article was originally presented as part of the Public Management Research Conference, Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., November 1979),