Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

A General Outlook to the Endogenous Money Theory

İÇSEL PARA TEORİSİ’NE GENEL BİR BAKIŞ

Pages
51–79
Publication Date
2008-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The theory needs to be brought up to date by incorporating the important transformations that have been taking place in the financial markets.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to shed light on the origins of the endogenous money theory and analyze the current debates on this topic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Endogenous money approach depends on a fundamental postulate: As banks meet the credit needs of non-financial businesses, new deposits emerge in the banking sector.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The theory needs to be brought up to date by incorporating the important transformations that have been taking place in the financial markets.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İçsel para · para arzı · faiz oranları

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to shed light on the origins of the endogenous money theory and analyze the current debates on this topic. Endogenous money approach depends on a fundamental postulate: As banks meet the credit needs of non-financial businesses, new deposits emerge in the banking sector. Similarly, as the necessary reserves found for these new deposits the broad money expands as well. Even though the central bank can intervene into this process it cannot fully control it. There is not a clear-cut consensus on the endogenous money creation process and a lively debate among the proponents of the theory still continues. The purpose of this study is to reveal that such debates have outlived their shelf time, and lost their validity in the changing financial structure. Even though these debates enabled the theory to evolve and develop, they have disregarded the recent developments in financial markets. The theory needs to be brought up to date by incorporating the important transformations that have been taking place in the financial markets.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın ana amacı içsel para teorisinin kökenlerini incelemek ve bu konudaki güncel tartışmalara ışık tutmaktır. İçsel para yaklaşımı temel bir önermeye dayanmaktadır: Reel ekonomide faaliyet gösteren işletmelerin kredi talebi, bankalar tarafından karşılandıkça bankacılık sektöründe yeni mevduatlar oluşur. Bu yeni mevduatlar için gerekli rezervlerin bulunması ile de para arzı genişlemeye başlar. Merkez bankası bu sürece müdahale edebilse de tamamen kontrol edemez. İçsel para yaratım süreci konusunda da tam bir fikir birliği yoktur ve bu teorinin savunucuları arasında canlı bir tartışma devam etmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı söz konusu tartışmaların miadını doldurduğunu ve değişen finansal yapı içinde geçerliliğini kaybettiğini ortaya koymaya çalışmaktır. Bu tartışmalar, teorinin evrilip gelişmesine yol açmış olsa da son yıllarda finansal alanda yer alan yenilikleri gözden kaçırmıştır. Bu nedenle söz konusu teorinin bir kez daha gözden geçirilerek günün şartlarına uyumlu hale getirilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu amaçla, bu çalışmada öncelikle içsel para teorisinin gelişimi incelenecek ve ardından teorinin günümüzde eksik kalan yönlerine değinilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGÜR, G. (2008). A General Outlook to the Endogenous Money Theory. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 51–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/670318

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ateşoğlu, S. (2003-4) “Monetary Transmission - Federal Funds Rate and Prime Rate”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 26(2), 357-62.
  2. Barber, R.; and T. Ghilarducci (1993) “Pension Funds, Capital Markets, and the Economic Future”, in G. A. Dimsky, G. A.; G. Epstein and R. Pollin (eds.), Transforming the U.S. Financial System, Economic Policy Institute Series, Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 287-319.
  3. Bennett, P., and S. Peristani (2002) “Are U.S. Reserve Requirements Still Binding?” FRBNY Economic Policy Review, (May), 1-16.
  4. Bernanke, B. S., and M. Gertler (1995) “Inside the Black Box: The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 27-48.
  5. Bibow, J. (2000) “On Exogenous Money and Bank Behaviour: The Pandora’s Box Kept Shut in Keynes’ Theory of Liquidity Preference”, European Journal of History of Economic Thought, 7(4), 532-568.
  6. Bradley, C. M., and L. Shibut (2006) “The Liability Structure of FDIC-Insured Institutions: Changes and Implications”, FDIC Banking Review, 18(2), 1-37.
  7. Cuthbertson, K. (1985) “Sterling Bank Lending to UK Industrial and Commercial Companies”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 47(2), 91-118. D’Arista, J. (2002) “Rebuilding the Transmission System for Monetary Policy”, Financial Markets and Society, (November), 1-28.
  8. Dow, S. C. (2006) “Endogenous Money: Structuralist”, in P. Arestis and M. Sawyer (eds.), A Handbook of Alternative Monetary Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 35-51.
  9. Dow, A. C., and S. C. Dow (1989) “Endogenous Money Creation and Idle Balances”, in J. Pheby (ed.), New Directions in Post-Keynsean Economics, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 147-64.
  10. Ertürk, K. (1998) “From the Treatise to the General Theory: The Transformation of Keynes’ Theory of Investment in Working Capital”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(2): 173-85.
  11. Fontana, G. (2003) “Post Keynesian Approaches to Endogenous Money: A Time Framework Explanation”, Review of Political Economy, 15(3), 291-314.
  12. Friedman, B. (1999) “The Future of Monetary Policy: The Central Bank as An Army with only a Signal Corps?”, International Finance, 2(3), 321-38.
  13. Friedman, B. (2000) “Decoupling at the Margin: The Threat to Monetary Policy from the Electronic Revolution in Banking”, International Finance, 3(2), 261-72.
  14. Friedman, M. and A. Schwarz (1963) A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  15. Fullwiler, S. T. (2006) “Setting Interest Rates in the Modern Money Era”, Journal of Post Keynesian E