Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

SOCIAL INNOVATION: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT STUDY

SOSYAL YENİLİKÇİLİK: BİR ÖLÇEK GELİŞTİRME ÇALIŞMASI

Pages
165–190
Publication Date
2014-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the findings, a reliable and valid social innovativeness scale with eight items was employed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Social Innovation: A Scale Development Study Social innovation is defined as being new ideas or solution proposals to latent needs of humans in order to increase life standards and wealth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The concept has started to attract academicians’ attentions, especially after 1990s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the findings, a reliable and valid social innovativeness scale with eight items was employed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal yenilikçilik · sosyal inovasyon · sosyal yenilik

Abstract

Social Innovation: A Scale Development Study Social innovation is defined as being new ideas or solution proposals to latent needs of humans in order to increase life standards and wealth. The concept has started to attract academicians’ attentions, especially after 1990s. The aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable individual level social innovation instrument which is suitable to Turkish culture and to contribute especially to management literature. In this context, survey method was used and a comprehensive field study was designed with the participation of senior students from different faculties of universities in different geographical and socioeconomic regions. According to the findings, a reliable and valid social innovativeness scale with eight items was employed.

Özet

Özellikle 1990’dan sonra bilimsel çalısmaların yogunlastıgı sosyal yenilikçilik kavramı insanların hayat standartlarını ve refahlarını yükseltebilmek, daha önce karsılanmamıs ihtiyaçlara çözüm önerileri ya da yeni fikirler sunabilmek olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bu çalısmanın amacı, Türk kültürüne uygun, birey düzeyinde geçerli ve güvenilir bir sosyal yenilikçilik ölçeginin gelistirilerek özellikle Yönetim yazınına kazandırılmasıdır. Bu dogrultuda, anket yönteminin kullanıldıgı, farklı cografi ve sosyo-ekonomik bölgelerden üniversitelerin farklı fakültelerinden son sınıf ögrencilerinin katıldıgı bir saha çalısması tasarlanmıstır. Yapılan analizler sonucu tek boyutlu, sekiz maddeden olusan geçerli ve güvenilir bireysel sosyal yenilikçilik egilimini ölçen bir ölçek

🔖

Cite This Article

HALAÇ, D. S., EREN, H., BULUT, Ç. (2014). SOCIAL INNOVATION: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT STUDY. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 165–190. https://ajindex.com/articles/670229

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Algina, J., H.J. Kesselman (1997) “Detecting Repeated Measures Effects with Univariate and Multivariate Statistics”, Psychological Methods, 2, 208-218.
  2. Ashoka C. (2011) Home Page, 21 Mayıs 2011 http://www.ashoka.org/
  3. Aytaç, Ö., S. İlhan (2007) “Girişimcilik ve Girişimci Kültür: Sosyolojik bir Perspektif”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18, 101-120.
  4. Atatürk, M.K. (2006) Nutuk (1919-1927), (Haz: Z. Korkmaz), Ankara: Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Yayınları.
  5. Bornstein, D. (1998) “Changing the World on a Shoestring: An Ambitious Foundation Promotes Social Change by Finding Social Entrepreneurs”, Atlantic Monthly, 281(1), 34-39.
  6. Buchegger, B., M. Ornetzeder (2000) “Social Innovations on the Way to Sustainable Development”, ESEE Conference Proceeding, Vienna. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006) Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı (6. Baskı). Ankara:
  7. Pegem Yayıncılık. Clayton, P. (1997) Implementation of Organizational Innovation, Toronto: Academic Press.
  8. Coates, J.F. (2000) “Innovation in the Future of Engineering Design”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 64, 121-132.
  9. Conger, S.D. (1974)
  10. Social Inventions, Prince Albert, Canada: Saskatchewan Newstart Conger, S.D. (2009)
  11. Social Inventions, The Innovation Journal, Canada, 20 Mayıs 2011, http://www.innovation.cc/books/conger_social_inventions1_09232009min.pdf
  12. Cooke, P., D. Wills (1999) “Small Firms, Social Capital and the Enhancement of Business Performance through Innovation Programmes”, Small Business Economics, 13, 219-234.
  13. Damanpour, F. (1991) “Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Determinants and Moderations”, Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555- 590. Dees, G.J. (2007) “Taking Social Entrepreneurship Seriously”, Transaction Social Science and Modern Society, 44(3), 24-31.
  14. Dees, G.J. (2001) “The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship”, Stanford University Graduate http://www.caseatduke.org/documents/dees_sedef.pdf of Business, 15 Mayıs 2011,
  15. Drazin, R., M.A. Glynn, R.K. Kazanjian (1999) “Multilevel Theorizing about Creativity in Organizations: A Sensemaking Perspective”, Academy of Management Review, 24, 286-323.
  16. Drucker, P.F. (1985)
  17. Innovation and Entrepreneurship, London: Heinnemann. Drucker, P.F. (2002)
  18. Managing in the Next Society, New York: Truman Talley. Elçi, Ş. (2006) İnovasyon Kalkınmanın ve Rekabetin Anahtarı, Ankara:
  19. Pelin Ofset. Fontan, J. M., J.L. Klein, D.G. Tremblay (2004) “Innovation and Society: Broadening the Analysis of the Territorial Effects