SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

DUTCH DISEASE RISK IN CENTRAL ASIAN TURKISH REPUBLICS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS

ORTA ASYA TÜRK CUMHURİYETLERİNDE HOLLANDA HASTALIĞI RİSKİ: AMPİRİK BİR ANALİZ

Mehmet MERCAN
İsmet GÖÇER
Pages
251–274
Publication Date
2014-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that trade openness; foreign direct investments and government expenditures have positive impact on the real exchange rate in these countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, Dutch disease hypothesis tested for the Central Asian Turkish Republics via panel data analysis methods for 1990-2010 periods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the analysis, an increase in crude oil price negatively affects the real exchange rate and Dutch Disease hypothesis invalid in these countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that trade openness; foreign direct investments and government expenditures have positive impact on the real exchange rate in these countries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Hollanda hastalığı · Orta Asya Türk Cumhuriyetleri · Dutch disease

Abstract

In this study, Dutch disease hypothesis tested for the Central Asian Turkish Republics via panel data analysis methods for 1990-2010 periods. As a result of the analysis, an increase in crude oil price negatively affects the real exchange rate and Dutch Disease hypothesis invalid in these countries. It was found that trade openness; foreign direct investments and government expenditures have positive impact on the real exchange rate in these countries.

Özet

Bu çalısmada Hollanda hastalıgı hipotezi, Orta Asya Türk Cumhuriyetleri için, 1990-2011 dönemi verileriyle, panel veri analizi yöntemiyle test edilmistir. Analiz sonucunda, bu ülkelerde petrol fiyatlarındaki artısların, reel döviz kurunu negatif yönde etkiledigi ve söz konusu hipotezin geçerli olmadıgı tespit edilmistir. Ticari dısa açıklık, dogrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve kamu harcamalarının ise reel döviz kurunu pozitif yönde etkiledigi bulgusuna ulasılmıstır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MERCAN, M., GÖÇER, İ. (2014). DUTCH DISEASE RISK IN CENTRAL ASIAN TURKISH REPUBLICS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 251–274. https://ajindex.com/articles/670222

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Adenauer, I., L. Vagassky (1998) “Aid and the Real Exchange Rate: Dutch Effects in Afrian Countries”, Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policiy, 33(4), 177-185.
  2. Arı, A., B. Özcan (2012) “Hollanda Hastalığı: Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler Üzerine Bir Uygulama”, Sosyoekonomi, 2, 153-172.
  3. Atkinson, G., K. Hamilton (2003) “Savings, Growth and The Resource Curse Hypothesis”, World Development, 31(11), 1793-1807.
  4. Baltagi, B.H. (2001) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, (2d ed) New York: John Wiley&Sons. Baltagi, B.H. (2005) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, (3d ed) New York: John Wiley&Sons. Beyaert, A., M. Camacho (2008) “TAR Panel Unit Root Tests and Real Convergence: An Application to the EU Enlargement Process”, Review of Development Economics, 12(3), 668-681.
  5. Breitung, J. (2000) “The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data”, in B. Baltagi (ed.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels”, Advances in Econometrics, 15, Amsterdam: Jai, 161-178.
  6. Choi, I. (2001) “Unit Roots Tests For Panel Data”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 229–272.
  7. Collier, P., A. Hoeffler (2004) “Greed and Grievance in Civil War”, Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), 563–95.
  8. Corden, W.M., J.P. Neary (1982) “Booming Sector and De-Industrialisation in a Small Open Economy”, The Economic Journal, 92(368), 825-848.
  9. De Gregorio, J., H. Wolf (1994) “Terms of Trade, Productivity, and the Real Exchange Rate”, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, No. 4807. Demirtepe, M.T. (2008) Orta Asya ve Kafkasya'da Güç Politikası, No:16, Ankara:
  10. USAK Yayınları.
  11. Elbadawi, I.A. (1999) “External Aid: Help or Hindrance to Export Orientation in Africa”, Journal of African Economies, 8(4), 578-616.
  12. Egert, B. (2005) “Equilibrium Exchange Rates in South Eastern Europe, Russia, Ukraine and Turkey: Healthy or (Dutch) Diseased?” Economic Systems, 29(2), 205–241.
  13. Elbadawi, I.E., M. Soto (1997) “Real Exchange Rates and Macroeconomic Adjustments in Sub-Sahran Africa and Other Developing Countries”, Journal of African Economics, 6,1-56.
  14. Emre, A. (2012) “Devrimlerden Sonra Arap Baharı”, DÜBAM (Dünya Bülteni Araştırma Masası) Yayınları.
  15. Gylfason, T. (2004) “Natural Resources and Economic Growth: From Dependence to Diversification”, CEPR Discussion paper, No. 4804. Greene, W.H. (2003) Econometric Analysis, (5th Ed) Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice- Hall. Gujarati, D.N. (1999)
  16. Basic Econometrics, Mc Graw Hill. (3rd Ed.), İstanbul:
  17. Literatür Yayıncılık. Hadri, K. (2