SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3

THE DETERMINANTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS OF TURKISH MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY: A PANEL DATA ANALYSIS

Türk İmalat Sanayinin Uluslararası Rekabet Gücünün Belirleyenleri: Panel Veri Analizi

Gökçe MANAVGAT
Ayten Ayşen KAYA
Pages
1–22
Publication Date
2016-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, it is also observed that Turkey is inadequate in adapting to the demand structure of trading partners for acquiring competitive power, and this has adverse effects on Turkey’s market share.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study analyses the determinants of the competitiveness of Turkish manufacturing industries vis-a-vis the 25 top trading partners for the period 2003-2012.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Then, for the Turkish manufacturing industry ISIC Rev 3 sub sectors, the effect of price and non-price competition factors on the market shares of low, medium low, medium high and high technology exports in the total exports for 25 countries are analysed by using panel data methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, it is also observed that Turkey is inadequate in adapting to the demand structure of trading partners for acquiring competitive power, and this has adverse effects on Turkey’s market share.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:rekabet · panel veri analizi

Abstract

This study analyses the determinants of the competitiveness of Turkish manufacturing industries vis-a-vis the 25 top trading partners for the period 2003-2012. Firstly, leading manufacturing industry export product groups are examined in terms of ability to produce goods consistent with foreign market demand and product diversity. Then, for the Turkish manufacturing industry ISIC Rev 3 sub sectors, the effect of price and non-price competition factors on the market shares of low, medium low, medium high and high technology exports in the total exports for 25 countries are analysed by using panel data methods. Our findings show that even though the determinants of the Turkish manufacturing industry's export market share competitiveness vary for different technology levels, price factors are more prominent in enhancing competitive power. However, it is also observed that Turkey is inadequate in adapting to the demand structure of trading partners for acquiring competitive power, and this has adverse effects on Turkey’s market share.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, 2003-2012 döneminde Türkiye’nin en fazla ticaret yaptığı toplam 25 ülke ile rekabet gücünün belirleyenleri incelenmiştir. İlk olarak imalat sanayi ürün grupları ihracatında öne çıkan sektörlerin dış piyasa talebiyle uyumlu mal üretebilme gücü ve ürün çeşitliği yönündeki durumu tespit edilmiştir. Daha sonra Türk imalat sanayi ISIC Rev.3 alt sektörleri için fiyat ve fiyat dışı rekabet faktörlerinin düşük, orta düşük ve orta yüksek, yüksek teknoloji düzeylerinde toplam 25 ülkedeki ihracat piyasa payına etkileri panel veri yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, Türk imalat sanayinin ihracat piyasa payı rekabetinin belirleyenleri farklı teknoloji düzeylerine göre değişmekle birlikte, fiyat faktörlerinin rekabet gücü sağlamada etkili olduğu gözlenmiştir. Ancak rekabet gücü elde etmede ticaret ortağı ülkelerin talep yapısına uyum göstermede yetersiz kaldığı ve piyasa payını olumsuz etkilediği saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MANAVGAT, G., KAYA, A. A. (2016). THE DETERMINANTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS OF TURKISH MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY: A PANEL DATA ANALYSIS. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3, 1–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/670194

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Amendola, G., Dosi, G., Papagni, E. (1993), “The Dynamics of International Competitiveness”, Wltwirtshaftlisches Archiv, 129, 451-471.
  2. Balcılar, M., Bal, H.,,Algan N., Demiral, M. (2014), “Türkiye’nin İhracat Performansı: İhracat Hacminin Temel Belirleyicilerinin İncelenmesi (1995-2012)”
  3. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3, 451-462.
  4. Baltagi, B. H. (2005), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester. Carlin, W., Glyn A., Reenen, J.(1999), “Export Market Performance of OECD Countries: An Empirical Examination of the Role of Cost Competitiveness”, The Institute of Fiscal Policy Studies Working Paper Series No.W99/21. Castillo, O. N., Santibanez, A. L., Bolivar, H. R. (2011), “Technological Determinants of Market Shares of Mexican Manufacturing Exports”, Asian Journal of Latin American Studies, 24(1), 53-81.
  5. Erlat G., Erlat H. (2004),“Türkiye’nin Orta Doğu Ülkeleri İle Olan Ticareti, 1990-2002”, Türkiye Ekonomi Kurumu (TEK), GAP Bölgesinde Dış Ticaret ve Tarım (Editörler, E. Uygur ve İ. Civcir), Ankara, 33-56.
  6. Fagerberg, J. (1988), “International Competitiveness”, The Economic Journal, Vol.98, No. 391, 355-374.
  7. Fagerberg, J. (1996), Technology And Competitiveness. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(3), 39-51.
  8. Filiztekin A. (2006), “Türkiye’de Açıklanmış Karşılaştırmalı Üstünlüklerin Evrimi” Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Dış Ticaret Politikaları, Yıl: 1, Sayı: 1, 101-116.
  9. Greene, W.H. (2003), Econometric Analysis, 3rd Edition,
  10. Prentice Hall. Gujarati, D. N., Poter, D.C. (2012), Basic Econometrics, 5. Baskıdan Çeviri (Çev. Şenesen E.,Şenesen G.), Literatür Yayınları Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A. (2010), “Country Diversification, Product Ubiquity, and Economic Divergence," Working Paper Series, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government. Hsiao, C. (2003), Analysis of Panel Data, 2rd Edition,
  11. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Kaya, A. A. (2006), “İmalat Sanayi İhracatında Uzmanlaşma: Türkiye -Avrupa Birliği Analizi (1991–2003”),
  13. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt 6, Sayı 2. Keesing, D. B. (1966). “Labor Skills and Comparative Advantage”, The American Economic Review, 56 (1/2), 249-258.
  14. Kenen, P. B. (1965). “Nature, Capital, and Trade”, The Journal of Political Economy, 73(5), 437-460.
  15. Keyder, N., Sağlam, Y., Öztürk, M.K. (2004), International Competitiveness and the Unit Labor Cost Based Competitiveness Index”, METU Studies in Development, 31, 43-70.
  16. Kotan, Z., Sayan, S. (2003), “Türk İhraç Ürünl