Journals / Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

The Effects Of Planting Density, Cutting Stage and Cutting Number On Yield and Quality Of Stevia rebaudiana B

Pages
81–90
Publication Date
2019-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Pre-flowering stage had significant effect on stevioside in the affirmative way.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To avoid harmful health effects of synthetic sugar and also due to human attention to supply sugar from natural sources, the interests of the sugar plants cultivation, especially Stevia rebaudiana have been increased.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The experiment conducted in a split plot design consisted of three planting density, 30 × 60, 45 × 60 and 60 × 60 cm in the main plot and two cutting time in various growth stages in subplots with three replications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Pre-flowering stage had significant effect on stevioside in the affirmative way.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Stevia · cutting · density

Abstract

To avoid harmful health effects of synthetic sugar and also due to human attention to supply sugar from natural sources, the interests of the sugar plants cultivation, especially Stevia rebaudiana have been increased. A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of planting density, cutting stage and cutting number on Stevia. In Çukurova region, which is classified as Mediterranean climate. The experiment conducted in a split plot design consisted of three planting density, 30 × 60, 45 × 60 and 60 × 60 cm in the main plot and two cutting time in various growth stages in subplots with three replications. Since there were two cuttings in the season, the differences between cuttings, statistical analysis was valued by using split-split plot design in time. Planting density significantly affected the dry leaf yield and the higher yield (110.9 kg da-1) was obtained from the plants, spaced 30 × 60 cm. Plants cutting at flowering stage had high dry leaf weight (20.55 g plant-1) and yield (84.70 kg da-1). Also, more dry leaf weight and yield were obtained from first cuttings. Leaves of closer plant densities produced high content of stevioside. Pre-flowering stage had significant effect on stevioside in the affirmative way.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAMADPOURRIGANI, E., TANSI, L. S., KAFKAS, N. E. (2019). The Effects Of Planting Density, Cutting Stage and Cutting Number On Yield and Quality Of Stevia rebaudiana B. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 81–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/667721

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Angelini LG and Tavarini S (2014).
  2. Steviol Glycoside Yield, Nutrient Concentration and Uptake of Stevia rebaudiana Bert. under Mediterranean Field Conditions Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 45(19):2577-2592.
  3. Aladakatti YR, Palled YB, Chetti MB, Halikatti SI, Alagundagi SC, Patil PL, Patil VC, and Janawade AD (2012).
  4. Effect of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Levels on Growth and Yield of Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni). Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 25(1): 25-29.
  5. Allam AI, Nassar AM and Besheite SY (2001). Nitrogen fertilizer requirement of Stevia rabaudiana Bertoni under Egyptian condition. Egyptian J. Agric. Res. 79:1005-1018.
  6. Andolfi L, Macchia M and Ceccarini L 2006. Agronomic-productive characteristics of two genotype of Stevia rebaudiana in Central Italy. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 1(2): 257-263.
  7. Anonym (2010). Steviol glycosides. International Stevia Council. http://www.Internationalsteviacouncil. org. Barriocanal L, Palacios M, Benitez G, Benitez S, Jimenez J and Jimenez N (2008). Apparent lack of pharmacological effect of steviol glycosides used as sweeteners in humans, a pilot study of repeated exposures in some normatensive and hypotensive individuals and in type 1 and type 2 diabetics. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 51:37-41.
  8. Bian Y M (1981). Studies on Stevia rebaudiana a new sweet-tasting plant refining stevioside and determination of its concentration. (Chinese). Plant Physiology Communications (3): 15-17.
  9. Brandle J E and Rosa N (1992). Heritability for yield, leaf: stem ratio and stevioside content estimated from a landrace cultivar of Stevia rebaudiana. Can. J. Plant Sci. 72: 1263-1266.
  10. Brandle JE, Starratt AN and Gijzen M (1998). Stevia rebaudiana: It´s Agricultural, Biological, and Chemical Properties [Review]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 78 (4): 527-536.
  11. Blumenthal M (1996). Perspectives ofFDA’Snew Stevia Policy, After four years, the agency lifts its ban-but only partially. Whole Foods Magazine, Febraury 1–5.
  12. Bondarev NI, Sukhanova MA, Reshetnyak OV and Nosov AM ( 2003). Steviol glycoside content in different organs of S.rebaudiana and its dynamics during ontogeny. Biol Plantarum, 47:261-264.
  13. Ceunen S, Werbrouck S and Geuns JMC (2012) Stimulation of steviol glycoside accumulation in Stevia rebaudiana by red led light. J Plant Physiol 169(7):749–752.
  14. Ceunen S and Geuns JM (2013). Steviol glycosides: chemical diversity, metabolism, and function. J. Nat. Prod. 76, 1201-1228.
  15. Dwivedi RS (1999). Unnurtu