Journals / Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı / 2019 / Sayı: 27

Spolia Use in Murad I Hüdavendigar Mosques in the Çanakkale Region

Pages
227–272
Publication Date
2019-12-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article focuses on the explicit use of spolia in the Murad I Hüdavendigar period mosques in the Çanakkale region as an expression of political and religious identity and a sign of power beyond sheer architectural decoration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz The mosques built in Çanakkale and environs under the commission of Murad I Hüdavendigar or under his name during his reign are referred to as Hüdavendigar mosques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Gelibolu Hüdavendigar Mosque was completely rebuilt in the 19th century and Umurbey Hüdavendigar Mosque was similarly rebuilt in the 20th century.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article focuses on the explicit use of spolia in the Murad I Hüdavendigar period mosques in the Çanakkale region as an expression of political and religious identity and a sign of power beyond sheer architectural decoration.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Çanakkale · I. Murad Hüdavendigar · mosque

Özet

Öz The mosques built in Çanakkale and environs under the commission of Murad I Hüdavendigar or under his name during his reign are referred to as Hüdavendigar mosques. Of these structures, while Behramkale Hüdavendigar and Tuzla Hüdavendigar mosques have survived to the present day, Umurbey Hüdavendigar and Gelibolu Hüdavendigar mosques have undergone restorations, were rebuilt and thus have lost their original properties, with only their names remanining unchanged. Gelibolu Hüdavendigar Mosque was completely rebuilt in the 19th century and Umurbey Hüdavendigar Mosque was similarly rebuilt in the 20th century. Archival data and the spolia materials present in their current state were examined in an effort to obtain information regarding the spolia use in their original architecture. The reused of materials (spolia), which was a common practice in Anatolia since Late Antiquity, came into prominence in Anatolian Seljuk and Beylik Era architecture, at times functionally and at others as an element of primary decoration1. This article focuses on the explicit use of spolia in the Murad I Hüdavendigar period mosques in the Çanakkale region as an expression of political and religious identity and a sign of power beyond sheer architectural decoration.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTUR, H. (2019). Spolia Use in Murad I Hüdavendigar Mosques in the Çanakkale Region. Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı, Sayı: 27, 227–272. https://ajindex.com/articles/66729

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Alchermes, Joseph, “Spolia in Roman Cities of the Late Empire: Legislative Rationales and Architectural Reuse”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, Volume 48, Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, 1994, pp.167-178.
  2. Ar, Bilge, “Spolia usage in Anatolian rulers: A comparison of ideas for Byzantines, Anatolian Seljuqs and Ottomans”, ITU AZ Volume. 12 Issue. 2 pp. 3-17, İstanbul, 2015.
  3. Arel, Ayla, “Menteşe Beyliği Devrinde Peçin Şehri”, Anadolu Sanatı Araştırmaları I, pp. 69-101, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Mimarlık Tarihi ve Röleve Kürsüsü, İstanbul, 1968.
  4. Arslan, Nurettin, “2007 Yılı Lampsakos/Lapseki, Abydos ve Çan Yüzey Araştırması”, T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Kültür Varlıkları ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü, 26. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 26-30 Mayıs 2008 Ankara, 1. Volume, pp. 333-344, Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı DÖSİMM Basımevi, Ankara, 2009.
  5. Aslanapa, Oktay, Osmanlı Devri Mimarisi, İnkilâp Kitabevi, İstanbul, 1986.
  6. Ayverdi, Ekrem Hakkı, İstanbul Mimarî Çağının Menşei: Osmanlı Mimarîsinin İlk Devri, I, İstanbul, 1989.
  7. Batur, Afife, “Osmanlı Camilerinde Almaşık Duvar Üzerine”, Anadolu Sanatı Araştırmaları 2, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Mimarlık Tarihi ve Rölöve Kürsüsü, İstanbul, 1970.
  8. Bıçakçı, İsmail, Yunanistan’da Türk Mimarî Eserleri, İSAR Vakfı Yayınları, İstanbul, 2003.
  9. Boran, Ali, Behramkale Hüdavendigar Cami, Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi (TDVİA), Volume 18, 1998, pp. 287. https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/hudavendigar-camii--behramkale, (10.07.2019).
  10. Brenk, Beat, “Spolia from Constantine To Charlemagne Aesthetics Versus Ideology”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, Volume 41, pp. 103-109,
  11. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, 1987.
  12. Castellan, Antoine Laurent, Lettres sur La Grèce, L’Hellespont et Constantinople, I, Paris 1811. Castellan, H., Lettres sur la Morée, l’Hellespont et Constantinople, I, Paris 1808. Ceylan, Burcu, “Spolia: Geç Antik Dönemde Yapılar ve Yapı Elemanlarının İkinci Kullanımları”, Eskiçağ’ın Mekânları Zamanları İnsanları, (ed. Lale Özgenel), Homer Kitabevi, İstanbul, 2005, pp.74-84.
  13. Çelik, Zeynep, 19. Yüzyılda Osmnalı Başkenti Değişen İstanbul,
  14. Çeviren Selim Deringil, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul, 2017. Darrauzés, J., Notitiae Episcopatuum Ecclesiae Constantinopolitane, Paris, 1981.
  15. Doğan, Alkım, “Vallaury’nin Klasisist Cephe Tasarımları”, Geç Osmanlı Döneminde Sanat Mimarlık ve Kültür Karşılaşmaları, Yayına Hazırlayan Gözde Çelik, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul, 2018, pp. 191-203. E