Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

A COMPARISON OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN TURKEY AND EGYPT: MOTIVATIONS AND OBSTACLES

TÜRKİYE VE MISIR'DA DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIMLAR: BELİRLEYİCİLER VE ENGELLER

Pages
153–172
Publication Date
2015-03-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally the paper put emphasis on the similarities between the FDI performances and the obstacles that foreign investors face in these countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper compares the political economy of foreign direct investment (FDI) in relation to economic development strategies and legal framework for foreign firms in Egypt and Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The paper briefly examines the FDI performances of these countries starting from the end of the nineteenth century to the first decades of the twenty first century.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally the paper put emphasis on the similarities between the FDI performances and the obstacles that foreign investors face in these countries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mısır · Türkiye · Ekonomik Koşullar

Abstract

This paper compares the political economy of foreign direct investment (FDI) in relation to economic development strategies and legal framework for foreign firms in Egypt and Turkey. The paper briefly examines the FDI performances of these countries starting from the end of the nineteenth century to the first decades of the twenty first century. In addition, in this paper, the legal framework for FDI is analyzed. Finally the paper put emphasis on the similarities between the FDI performances and the obstacles that foreign investors face in these countries.

Özet

%X oDOÕúPDGD 0ÕVÕU YH 7UNL\H¶GH 'R÷UXGDQ <DEDQFÕ <DWÕUÕPODUÕQHNRQRPLN NDONÕQPD VWUDWHMLOHUL YH KXNXNVDO oHUoHYH ED÷ODPÕQGD HNRQRPL SROLWL÷Lincelenmektedir. dDOÕúPDGD Rn GRNX]XQFX \]\ÕO VRQXQGDQ \LUPL ELULQFL \]\ÕObaúÕQD NDGDU 7UNL\H YH 0ÕVÕU¶ÕQ 'R÷UXGDQ <DEDQFÕ <DWÕUÕP SHUIRUPDQVÕLQFHOHQPHNWH KXNXNVDO PHY]XDW YH XOXVODUDUDVÕ \DWÕUÕPFÕODUÕQ NDUúÕODúWÕNODUÕVRUXQODUNDUúÕODúWÕUÕOPDNWDGÕU

🔖

Cite This Article

DUMLUDAĞ, D. (2015). A COMPARISON OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN TURKEY AND EGYPT: MOTIVATIONS AND OBSTACLES. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 153–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/6631

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. DPT ('HYOHW3ODQODPD7HúNLODWÕ), First Five-Year Development Plan, 1963-1967 (Ankara: Turkish Republic Prime Ministry, 1963)
  2. DUMLUDAG, Devrim, An Analysis of the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Turkey: The Role of the Institutional Context, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 1/2009.
  3. ERDEN, Deniz A Survey of Foreign Direct Investment Firms in Turkey øVWDQEXO %R÷D]LoLhQLYHUVLW\ HANDOUSSA, H and M. Louis “Brownfield Investment in Emerging Markets The Case of Egypt” in DRC Working Papers Foreign Direct Investment in Emerging Markets London: London Business School 2003
  4. HANDOUSSA, H and N. El-Mikawy “Institutional Reform and Economic Development in Egypt.” Economic Research Forum, Egypt, 2001.
  5. HANSEN, Bent The Political Economy of Poverty, Equity, and Growth Egypt and Turkey. World Bank:1991. ISO (Istanbul Chamber of Industry Report), IstanbXO,62 KAPOOR, A. Foreign Investments and the New Middle East A Survey of Prospects, Problems and Planning Strategies, New Jersey:1975
  6. LOUIS, Maryse and Alia El Mahdy, H. Handoussa “Foreign Direct Investment in Egypt” in Investment Strategies in Emerging Markets, London:2003.
  7. ÖKÇÜN, A. Gündüz 1920-  \ÕOODUÕ DUDVÕQGD NXUXODQ 7UN $QRQLP ùLUNHWOHULQGH PAMUK ùHYNHW The Ottoman Empire and European Capitalism. 1820- 1913:
  8. Trade, Investment and Production (Cambridge: New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987),
  9. SHAFIK, Nemat. “Private Investment and Public Policy: The Egyptian Case” in Reviving Private Investment in Developing Countries Empirical Studies and Policy Lessons ed. by A Chibber, M. Dailami and N. Shafik, Elsevier Science & Technology Books, 1992.
  10. SPRINGBORG, Robert “Egypt” in Economic and Political Liberalization in the Middle East ed. by Tim Niblock and Emma Murphy London: I B Tauris & Co Ltd,1993. T(.(/ø ø DQG 6 øONLQ 6DYDú 6RQUDVÕ 2UWDPÕQGD   7UNL\H øNWLVDGL.DONÕQPD3ODQÕ $QNDUD 2UWD'R÷X7HNQLNhQLYHUVLWHVL THE WORLD BANK, World Business Environment Survey, Washington: WB, 2010
  11. UNCTAD Investment Policy Review, Egypt. Geneva, 1999. UNCTAD. Report by the Secretariet of the UNCTAD. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2002.
  12. UNCTAD, Handbook of Statistics, Geneva: UNCTAD, 2006
  13. UNCTAD, Handbook of Statistics, Geneva: UNCTAD, 2010