Journals / Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Co-Branding in Financial Products: A Study on Co-Branded Credit Cards

Finansal Ürünlerde Ortak Markalama: Ortak Markalı Kredi Kartları Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Pages
407–425
Publication Date
2022-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, intention to use co-branded credit card is the main determinant of co-brand loyalty (β=0.97 p<0.01).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to determine how perceived benefit and trust in co-branded credit cards affect the intention to use a co-branded credit card, and the indirect and direct effects of these factors on co-brand loyalty.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the results, intention to use co-branded credit card is the main determinant of co-brand loyalty (β=0.97 p<0.01).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, it offers some tips to financial product providers that they can use in practice.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Finansal Ürünler · Ortak Markalama · Güven

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine how perceived benefit and trust in co-branded credit cards affect the intention to use a co-branded credit card, and the indirect and direct effects of these factors on co-brand loyalty. To test the conceptual model created for this purpose, an online questionnaire was applied to bank customers who own at least at least one co-branded credit card. First of all, participant responses were subjected to explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis. Afterwards, path analysis was performed in order to determine the effects of the relations between the structures in the model. According to the results, intention to use co-branded credit card is the main determinant of co-brand loyalty (β=0.97 p<0.01). The intention to use a co-branded credit card is directly and positively affected by the perceived benefit of these cards (β=0.47 p<0.01) and the trust in the co-brand (β=0.50 p<0.01). When the indirect effects were examined, it was seen that co-brand loyalty was more affected by the perceived benefit of a co-branded credit card (β=0.87 p<0.01) than trust in the co-brand (β=0.49 p<0.01). This research develops the co-branding literature in financial products as it identifies the key points of success in interbank brand partnerships. On the other hand, it offers some tips to financial product providers that they can use in practice.

Özet

Bu çalışma, ortak markalı kredi kartlarında algılanan faydanın ve güvenin, ortak markalı bir kredi kartı kullanma niyetini nasıl etkilediğini ve bu unsurların ortak marka sadakatindeki dolaylı ve doğrudan etkilerini tespit etmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Bu amaçla oluşturulan kavramsal modeli test etmek için en az bir ortak markalı kredi kartına sahip banka müşterilerine çevrimiçi anket uygulanmıştır. Öncelikle katılımcı yanıtları, açıklayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Sonrasında modeldeki yapılar arasındaki ilişkilerin etki yönlerini belirleyebilmek için yol (path) analizi yapılmıştır. Sonuçlara göre ortak markalı kredi kartı kullanma niyeti, ortak marka sadakatinin temel belirleyicisidir (β=0,97 p<0,01). Ortak markalı kredi kartı kullanma niyeti ise bu kartların algılanan faydasından (β=0,47 p<0,01) ve ortak markaya olan güvenden (β=0,50 p<0,01) doğrudan pozitif bir şekilde etkilenmektedir. Dolaylı etkiler incelendiğinde; ortak marka sadakatinin, ortak markaya olan güvene göre (β=0,49 p<0,01) ortak markalı bir kredi kartının algılanan faydasından (β=0,87 p<0,01) daha fazla etkilendiği görülmüştür. Bu araştırma bankalar arası marka ortaklıklarında başarının kilit noktalarını tanımladığından finansal ürünlerde ortak markalama literatürünü geliştirmektedir. Finansal ürün sağlayıcılarına ise pratikte kullanabilecekleri birtakım ipuçları sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZPOLAT, C. (2022). Co-Branding in Financial Products: A Study on Co-Branded Credit Cards. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 407–425. https://ajindex.com/articles/662553

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aaker, D.A. (2004). Leveraging the corporate brand. California Management Review, 46(3), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/000812560404600301
  2. Abbo, M.H., Kumar, M. and Benavent, C. (2012). Determinants of cause co-branding success: A study of consumers' attitudes in banking sector. Banks & Bank Systems, 7(2), 107-115. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/
  3. Achrol, R.S. and Kotler, P. (1999). Marketing in the network economy. Journal of Marketing, 63(Special Issue), 146‐163. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429990634s114
  4. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
  5. Al-Debei, M.M., Akroush, M.N. and Ashouri, M.I. (2015). Consumer attitudes towards online shopping: The effects of trust, perceived benefits, and perceived web quality. Internet Research. 25(5), 707-733. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0146
  6. Alhaddad, A. (2015). Perceived quality, brand image and brand trust as determinants of brand loyalty. Journal of Research in Business and Management, 3(4), 01-08. Retrieved from http://www.questjournals.org/
  7. Atulkar, S. (2020). Brand trust and brand loyalty in mall shoppers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 38(5), 559-572. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-02-2019-0095
  8. Bass, A. (2004). Licensed extensions - stretching to communicate. Journal of Brand Management, 12(1), 31‐38. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540199
  9. Bennett, R. and Rundle-Thiele, S. (2002). A comparison of attitudinal loyalty measurement approaches. Journal of Brand Management, 9(3), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540069
  10. Besharat, A. (2010). How co-branding versus brand extensions drive consumers' evaluations of new products: A brand equity approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(8), 1240-1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.02.021
  11. Boad, B. (1999). Co-branding opportunities and benefits. In T. Blackett and B. Boad (Eds.), Co-branding (pp. 22-37). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Bonus Platformu. (2022). Erişim adresi: https://www.bonus.com.tr/bonus-platformu
  12. Bouten, L.M., Snelders, D. and Hultink, E.J. (2011). The impact of fit measures on the consumer evaluation of new co‐branded products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 455-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00819.x
  13. Bozpolat, C. (2021). Çevresel kaygının ve algılanan pazar etkisinin yeşil ürün satın alma davranışındaki rolü. KAÜİİBFD, 12(24), 702-727. https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.