Journals / EGE STRATEJİK ARAŞTIRMALAR DERGİSİ / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPT, STRATEGICAL IMPORTANCE AND MEASURING SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE: A LITERATURE REVIEW

KURUMSAL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK KAVRAMI, STRATEJİK ÖNEMİ VE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK PERFORMANSI ÖLÇÜMÜ

Pages
17–37
Publication Date
2018-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In these two perspectives this article contributes to the literature in two respects; first evidence form organizational theories about strategical aspects of corporate sustainability are demonstrated and second, critical indicators for measurement of corporate sustainability are discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Corporate sustainability concept is defined as a development in the natural movement of institutionalization rather than being a brand new paradigm by being associated and discussed with its predecessors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Explanations derived from different organizational theories are used in order to understand the role of corporate sustainability in corporate strategic decision-making processes, and the empirical work carried on the subject was compiled in this conceptual framework.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In these two perspectives this article contributes to the literature in two respects; first evidence form organizational theories about strategical aspects of corporate sustainability are demonstrated and second, critical indicators for measurement of corporate sustainability are discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik · Strateji · Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik Performansı

Abstract

Corporate sustainability concept is defined as a development in the natural movement of institutionalization rather than being a brand new paradigm by being associated and discussed with its predecessors. Explanations derived from different organizational theories are used in order to understand the role of corporate sustainability in corporate strategic decision-making processes, and the empirical work carried on the subject was compiled in this conceptual framework. Critical indicators of sustainability performance measurement were presented using sustainability reports. In these two perspectives this article contributes to the literature in two respects; first evidence form organizational theories about strategical aspects of corporate sustainability are demonstrated and second, critical indicators for measurement of corporate sustainability are discussed.

Özet

Kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik kavramı; öncülleri ile ilişkilendirilip tartışılarak yepyeni bir paradigma olmaktan ziyade kurumsallaşmanın doğal deviniminde bir gelişme olarak tanımlandı. Kurumsal stratejik karar verme süreçlerinde kurumsal sürdürülebilirliğin yerini anlamak için farklı örgüt kuramlarından açıklamalar getirildi, literatürde bu konuda yapılan ampirik çalışmalar bu kavramsal çerçevede derlendi. Sürdürülebilirlik raporları kullanılarak sürdürülebilirlik performansı ölçümüne dair kritik göstergeler sunuldu. Makale sürdürülebilirliğin stratejik önemine yönelik literatürde iki önemli kuramsal boşluğu doldurmaya katkı sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Turhan, G. D., Özen, T., Albayrak, R. S. (2018). CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPT, STRATEGICAL IMPORTANCE AND MEASURING SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE: A LITERATURE REVIEW. EGE STRATEJİK ARAŞTIRMALAR DERGİSİ, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 17–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/661350

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Alexander, G. J., & Buchholz, R. A. (1978). Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Academy of Management journal, 21(3), 479-486.
  2. Altuntaş, C., Türker, D. (2012). Sürdürülebilir Tedarik Zincirleri: Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlarının İçerik Analizi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(3), 39-64.
  3. Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012). Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study based on the top global corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 61-79.
  4. Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2009). Corporate sustainability reporting: a study in disingenuity?. Journal of business ethics, 87(1), 279-288.
  5. Artiach, T., Lee, D., Nelson, D., & Walker, J. (2010). The determinants of corporate sustainability performance. Accounting & Finance, 50(1), 31-51.
  6. Arlow, P., & Gannon, M. J. (1982). Social responsiveness, corporate structure, and economic performance. Academy of Management Review, 7(2), 235-241.
  7. AtKisson, A. (1996). Developing indicators of sustainable community: lessons from sustainable Seattle. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(4), 337-350.
  8. Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.
  9. Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93-103.
  10. Barnett, M. L. (2016). The Business Case for CSR: A Critique and an Indirect Path Forward. Business & Society (forthcoming). Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
  11. Becchetti, L., Di Giacomo, S., & Pinnacchio, D. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: evidence from a panel of US listed companies. Applied Economics, 40(5), 541-567.
  12. Borsa İstanbul (2014). Şirketler İçin Sürdürülebilirlik Rehberi, İstanbul. http://www.borsaistanbul.com/data/kilavuzlar/surdurulebilirlik-rehberi.pdf
  13. Borsa İstanbul (2015). BIST Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi Araştırma Metodolojisi, İstanbul. http://www.borsaistanbul.com/duyurular/2016/03/07/bist-surdurulebilirlik-endeksi-arastirma-metodolojisinde-degisiklik
  14. Bromiley, P. & Marcus, A. (1989). The deterrent to dubious corporate behavior: Profitability, probability and safety recalls. Strategic management journal, 10(3), 233-250.
  15. Brickley, J. A