SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

THE AIR BORNE PARTICULATE MATTER POLLUTION IN İZMİR

İZMİR HAVASINDAKİ PARTİKÜL MADDE KİRLİLİĞİ: ÖLÇÜM VE DEĞERLENDİRME

Ölçüm Ve DEĞERLENDİRME
Sinan YATKIN
Abdurrahman BAYRAM
Pages
15–27
Publication Date
2007-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that the spatial variation of PM10 at the different sites of the city was significant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The ambient air concentrations of particulate matter’s fractions (PM2.5 and PM10) were determined concurrently at suburban and urban sites in Izmir, Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sampling season was between June 2004 and May 2005.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that the spatial variation of PM10 at the different sites of the city was significant.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Partikül madde · PM10 · PM2

Abstract

The ambient air concentrations of particulate matter’s fractions (PM2.5 and PM10) were determined concurrently at suburban and urban sites in Izmir, Turkey. The sampling season was between June 2004 and May 2005. The mean concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 were 24.2 ± 12.2 and 46.9 ± 20.1 µg m -3 at the suburban site and 64.4 ± 38.5 and 80.0 ± 30.2 µg m - 3 at the urban site, respectively. The mean summer concentrations of two fractions were higher than winter ones at the suburban site; on the contrary, the concentrations at the urban site in winter were higher than in summer. The relationships between meteorological parameters such as wind direction, wind velocity and precipitation and the PM concentrations were evaluated. It was obtained that the PM concentrations were notably influenced by these parameters. It was also seen that PM2.5/PM10 ratio was affected by the same parameters; and the temporal variation of PM2.5/PM10 ratio was significant, too. The measured PM10 concentrations were compared to data obtained from four online stations located in the city. The results indicated that the spatial variation of PM10 at the different sites of the city was significant.

Özet

İzmir havasındaki partikül madde konsantrasyonları (PM2,5 ve PM10), şehir merkezinde (Yeşildere semti) ve yarı-kırsal özellikteki Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tınaztepe Yerleşkesi’nde eş zamanlı olarak bir yıl boyunca ölçülmüştür. Ölçüm dönemi Haziran 2004 ve Mayıs 2005 tarihleri arasıdır. PM2,5 ve PM10 ortalama konsantrasyonları Tınaztepe’de sırasıyla 24,1 ± 12,2 ve 46,9 ± 20,1 µg m-3 , Yeşildere’de 64,4 ± 38,5 ve 80,0 ± 30,2 µg m-3 , olarak ölçülmüştür. Her iki partikül madde fraksiyonunda yaz konsantrasyonları Tınaztepe’de kış değerlerinden yüksekken, Yeşildere’de tam tersi olmuştur. Partikül madde konsantrasyonlarının rüzgar yönü, hızı, yağış gibi meteorolojik değişkenlerle ilişkisi irdelenmiş ve bu etmenlerin etkisinin önemli boyutlarda olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEĞERLENDİRME, Ö. V., YATKIN, S., BAYRAM, A. (2007). THE AIR BORNE PARTICULATE MATTER POLLUTION IN İZMİR. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 15–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/659365

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Chaloulakou A., Kassomenos P., Spyrellis N., Demokritouc P., Koutrakis P. (2003):: “Measurements of PM10 and PM2,5 Particle Concentrations in Athens, Greece”, Atmospheric Environment, 37, sf. 649-660.
  2. Chan L.Y., Kwok W.S., Lee S.C., Chan C.Y. (2001): ”Spatial Variation of Mass Concentration of Roadside Suspended Particulate Matter in Metropolitan Hong Kong”, Atmospheric Environment, 35, sf. 3167-3176.
  3. Gao Y., Nelson E.D., Field M.P., Ding Q., Li H., Sherrell R.M., Gigliotti C.L., Van Ry D.A., Glenn T.R., Eisenreich S.J. (2002): “Characterization of Atmospheric Trace Elements on PM2,5 Particulate Matter Over the New York-New Jersey Harbor Estuary”, Atmospheric Environment, 36, sf. 1077-1086.
  4. Güllü G.H., Ölmez I., Tuncel G. (2000): “Temporal Variability of Atmospheric Trace Element Concentrations over the Eastern Mediterranean Sea”, Spectrochimica Acta Part B, 55, sf. 1135-1150.
  5. Harrison R.M., Yin J., Mark D., Stedman J., Appleby R.S., Booker J., Moorcroft S. (2001):: “Studies of the Coarse Particle (2,5-10 µm) Component in UK Urban Atmospheres”, Atmospheric Environment, 35, sf. 3667-3679.
  6. He K., Yang F., Ma Y., Zhang Q., Yao X., Chan C.K., Cadle S., Chan T., Mulawa P. (2001):: “The Characteristics of PM2,5 in Beijing, China”, Atmospheric Environment, 35, sf. 4959- 4970. Karaca F., Alagha O., Ertürk F. (2005): “Statistical Characterization of Atmospheric PM10 and PM2,5 Concentrations at a Non-impacted Suburban Site of Istanbul, Turkey”, Chemosphere, 59, sf. 1183-1190.
  7. Kim K.H., Kim M.Y., Hong S.M., Youn Y.H., Hwang S.J. (2005): “The Effects of Wind Speed on the Relative Relationships between Different Sized-fractions of Airborne Particles”, Chemosphere, 59, sf. 929-937.
  8. Marcazzan M.G., Vaccaro S., Valli G., Vecchi R. (2001): “Characterization of PM10 and PM2,5 Particulate Matter in the Ambient Air of Milan (Italy)”, Atmospheric Environment 35, sf. 4639-4650.
  9. Odabaşı M., Müezzinoğlu A., Bozlaker A. (2002): “Ambient Concentrations and Dry Deposition Fluxes of Trace Elements in Izmir, Turkey”, Atmospheric Environment, 36, sf. 5841-5851.
  10. Örnektekin S. (1997): “The Effects of Industrialization on Air Quality in Iskenderun, North East Mediterranean”, Environmental Research Forum, Volumes 7-8, 1997, sf. 51-57.
  11. Polissar A.V., Hopke P.K., Poirot R.L. (2001): “Atmospheric Aerosol Over Vermont: Chemical Composition and Sources”, Environmental Science and Technology, 35, sf. 4604-4621.
  12. Sun Y., Zhuang G., Wang Y., Han L., Guo J., Dan M., Zhang W., Wang Z., Hao Z. (2004):