Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Process Evaluation in Experimental Research in Nursing

Hemşirelikte Deneysel Araştırmalarda Süreç Değerlendirme

Pages
527–540
Publication Date
2022-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review is planned to provide perspective on the concept of process evaluation, the basic components and stages of process evaluation, and to emphasize the importance of process evaluation in nursing research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Process evaluation is an evaluation that contributes to the development of mechanisms, processes and implementation strategies that affect the success of the intervention and the aspects that need improvement in order to maximize the implementation of an intervention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, it contributes to the formation of scientific knowledge and evidence for the development of nursing practices and care, with strategies to improve the effectiveness of the intervention applied in nursing research.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review is planned to provide perspective on the concept of process evaluation, the basic components and stages of process evaluation, and to emphasize the importance of process evaluation in nursing research.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Süreç değerlendirme · Pilot çalışma · Randomize kontrollü çalışma

Abstract

Process evaluation is an evaluation that contributes to the development of mechanisms, processes and implementation strategies that affect the success of the intervention and the aspects that need improvement in order to maximize the implementation of an intervention. Process evaluation ensures that multidimensional interventions in the field of nursing are presented with sufficient accuracy, dose and quality by examining all aspects of the intervention, the mechanisms of action that affect the intervention, and the context of the intervention. Thus, it contributes to the formation of scientific knowledge and evidence for the development of nursing practices and care, with strategies to improve the effectiveness of the intervention applied in nursing research. Although well designed experimental studies, also known as outcome evaluation studies, have been included in the literature in recent years, it is seen that studies on process evaluation are limited. This review is planned to provide perspective on the concept of process evaluation, the basic components and stages of process evaluation, and to emphasize the importance of process evaluation in nursing research.

Özet

Süreç değerlendirme, bir girişimin uygulanmasını en üst düzeye çıkarmak amacıyla; uygulanan girişimin başarılı ve geliştirilmesi gereken yönlerini etkileyen mekanizmaların, süreçlerin ve uygulama stratejilerinin geliştirilmesine katkı sağlayan bir değerlendirmedir. Süreç değerlendirme, girişimin tüm yönlerini, girişimi etkileyen etki mekanizmalarını ve girişimin bağlamını inceleyerek hemşirelik alanındaki çok boyutlu müdahalelerin yeterli doğruluk, doz ve kalitede sunulmasını sağlamaktadır. Böylece, hemşirelik araştırmalarında uygulanan girişimlerin etkinliği süreç değerlendirme kullanılarak değerlendirilebilir. Son yıllarda hemşirelik alanında iyi tasarlanmış, sonuç değerlendirme çalışmaları olarak da bilinen, deneysel araştırmalar literatürde yer almasına rağmen süreç değerlendirmeye yönelik çalışmaların sınırlı olduğu görülmektedir. Bu derleme, süreç değerlendirme kavramı, süreç değerlendirmenin temel bileşenleri, aşamalarına yönelik bakış açısı kazandırmak ve hemşirelik araştırmalarında süreç değerlendirmenin önemini vurgulamak amacıyla planlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOYU, H. Ö., TÖRÜNER, E. K. (2022). Process Evaluation in Experimental Research in Nursing. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 527–540. https://ajindex.com/articles/658849

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Corder, K., Sharp, S. J., Jong, S. T., Foubister, C., Brown, H. E., Wells, E. K.,. & van Sluijs, E. M. (2020). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the GoActive intervention to increase physical activity among UK adolescents: A cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS medicine, 17(7), e1003210. Djulbegovic, B., Guyatt, G. H. (2017). Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on. The Lancet, 390(10092):415-23.
  2. Fisher, J., Nguyen, T., Tran, T. D., Tran, H., Tran, T., Luchters, S.,…Ha, T. (2019). Protocol for a process evaluation of a cluster randomized controlled trial of the learning club intervention for women's health, and infant's health and development in rural Vietnam. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1):511. Flemming, K., Booth, A., Hannes, K., Cargo, M. ve Noyes, J. (2018). Cochrane qualitative and implementation methods group guidance series—paper 6: reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 97:79-85.
  3. French, C., Pinnock, H., Forbes, G., Skene, I. ve Taylor SJ. (2020). Process evaluation within pragmatic randomised controlled trials: what is it, why is it done, and can we find it? a systematic review. Trials, 21(1):1-16.
  4. Hariton, E., Locascio, J. J. (2018). Randomised controlled trials- the gold standard for effectiveness research. BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 125(13):1716. Harris, K., Kneale, D., Lasserson, T.J., McDonald, V. M., Grigg J. ve Thomas, J. (2019). School‐based self‐management interventions for asthma in children and adolescents: a mixed methods systematic review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Hawkins, J., Charles, J. M., Edwards, M., Hallingberg, B., McConnon, L., Edwards, R. T.,. Moore, G. (2019). Acceptability and feasibility of implementing accelorometry-based activity monitors and a linked web portal in an exercise referral scheme: feasibility randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(3), e12374. Heerman, W. J., Sommer, E. C., Qi, A., Burgess, L. E., Mitchell, S. J., Samuels, L. R.,. Barkin, S. L. (2020). Evaluating dose delivered of a behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention: a secondary analysis. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1-11.
  5. Hulscher, M., Wensing, M. (2020). Process evaluation of implementation strategies. In: Wensing M, Grol R, Grimshaw J, editors. Improving patient care: the implementation of change in health care. 3th editio