Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

CAN WE PREDICT THE OUTCOME OF THE INTERNATIONAL FOOTBALL TOURNAMENTS? : THE CASE OF EURO 2000

ULUSLARARASI FUTBOL TURNUVALARININ SONUÇLARI TAHMİN EDİLEBİLİR Mİ? EURO 2000 ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
112–122
Publication Date
2005-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the three scenarios long-term, mid-term, and short-term based on the respective CV values of fifteen countries, France appeared to be the most likely country to win Euro 2000 and was closely followed by Spain.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper statistically analyses and attempts to predict the most likely winners of the Euro 2000 football tournament on the basis of the seasonal coefficients of variation CVs of the end-of-season points, which were computed from the top division final standings of participating countries of Euro 2000.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The CV values computed from over ten seasons for the respective countries were used as a sole measurement value to rank the countries and to determine the most likely winners of Euro 2000.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the three scenarios long-term, mid-term, and short-term based on the respective CV values of fifteen countries, France appeared to be the most likely country to win Euro 2000 and was closely followed by Spain.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Futbol · Sıralama · UEFA

Abstract

This paper statistically analyses and attempts to predict the most likely winners of the Euro 2000 football tournament on the basis of the seasonal coefficients of variation CVs of the end-of-season points, which were computed from the top division final standings of participating countries of Euro 2000. The CV values computed from over ten seasons for the respective countries were used as a sole measurement value to rank the countries and to determine the most likely winners of Euro 2000. According to the three scenarios long-term, mid-term, and short-term based on the respective CV values of fifteen countries, France appeared to be the most likely country to win Euro 2000 and was closely followed by Spain.

Özet

Bu çalışma Euro 2000 futbol turnuvasını hangi finalist ülkenin kazanabileceğini istatiksel olarak analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Euro 2000 futbol turnuvasına katılan finalist ülkelerin birinci liglerinde oluşan yıl sonu puan tablolarından hesaplanan değişim katsayısı DK bu öngörü için kullanılmıştır. Euro 2000 futbol turnuvası öncesi her finalist ülke için hesaplanan son on yılın DK değerleri, finalistlerin futboldaki rekabetçiliklerini sıralamada ve Euro 2000'ni kazanmalarında tek belirleyici değişken olarak kullanılmıştır. On beş finalist ülke için hesaplanan uzun, orta ve kısa dönem DK değerlerinden oluşturulan senaryolara göre Euro 2000 ni Fransa'nın kazanmasının en muhtemel olduğu ve İspanya nın ise diğer bir güçlü aday olduğu öngörülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

HALICIOĞLU, R. F. (2005). CAN WE PREDICT THE OUTCOME OF THE INTERNATIONAL FOOTBALL TOURNAMENTS? : THE CASE OF EURO 2000. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 112–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/658584

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. BAIMBRIDGE, M. (1997). Match attendance at Euro 96: was the crowd waving or drowning ? Applied Economics Letters, 4, pp.555-558.
  2. BAIMBRIDGE, M., CAMERON, M.S., & DAWSON, P. (1996). Satellite television and demand for football: a whole new ball game ? Scottish Journal ofPolitical Economy,43,VV3n-333. BERNARD, A.B., & BUSSE, M.R. (2000). Who wins the olympic games ? NBER Working Paper No. W7998. BORLAND, J. & MACDONALD, R. (2003). Demand for sport. Oxford Review of EconomicPolicy, 19, pp.479-501.
  3. BRYAN, L.B. & STEKLER, H.O. (1999). Are sports seedings good predictors ?: an evaluation. International Journal ofForecasting, 15, pp.83-91.
  4. BROWN, W.O., & SAUER, R.D. (1993). Does the basketball market believe in the hot hand ?: comment. The American Economic Review, 83, pp. 1377-1386.
  5. CAIRNS, J. A. (1990). The demand for professional team sports. British Review of Economic Issues,U,VV.\-2\. CAIRNS, J. A. (1988). Outcome of uncertainty and the demand for football. University of Aberdeen Department ofEconomics Discussion Paper, 88-02. (1987). Evaluating changes in league structure: the reorganization of the scottish football league. Applied Economics, 19, pp.259-275.
  6. CAIRNS, J. A. Jennet, N. & Sloane, P.J. (1986). The economics of professional team sports: a survey of theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Studies, 13, pp.3-81.
  7. CAMERER, C. (1989). Does the basketball market believe in the hot hand ? The American Economic Review, 79, pp.1257-1261.
  8. CONDON, E.M. GOLDEN, B.L. & WASIL (1999). Predicting the success of nations at the summer olympics using neural networks, Computers and Operations Research, 26, pp.243-265.
  9. DEMMERT, H. (1973). The economics ofprofessional team sports. Massachusetts, LexingtonBooks. DDCON, M.J. & COLES, S.G. (1997) Moddling association football scores and ineffıciencies in the UK football betting market. Journal of Royal Statistical SocietySeriesC, 46, 265-280.
  10. DOBSON, S.M. & GODDARD, J.A. (1992). The demand for football in the regions of England and Wales. Regional Studies, 30, pp.443-453.
  11. DOWNARD, P. & DAWSON, A. (2000) The Economics ofprofessional team sports. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  12. EL-HODIRI, M. & QUIRK, J. (1971). An economic model ofprofessional sports leagues. Journal ofPolitical Economy, 33, pp. 1302-1319.
  13. FALTER, J.M. & PERIGNON, C. (2000). Demand for football and interamatch winning probability: an essay on the glorious uncertainty of sports. Applied Economics,32,VV.n57-n65. FORREST, D., SIMMONS, R. & FEEHAN