SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

A RESEARCH ON THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG TECHNOLOGY, ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND PERFORMANCE

TEKNOLOJİ, ÖRGÜT YAPISI VE PERFORMANS ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Halis DEMİR
Tarhan OKAN
Pages
57–72
Publication Date
2009-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, the hypothesis that the interaction of technology and structure has a significant effect on the organizational performance has not been proven

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of this study is to examine the relationships among technology and organizational structure and organizational performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A moderator analysis was conducted on the data set obtained from 187 managers of large companies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, the hypothesis that the interaction of technology and structure has a significant effect on the organizational performance has not been proven
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Teknoloji · Performans · Örgüt yapısı

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to examine the relationships among technology and organizational structure and organizational performance. A moderator analysis was conducted on the data set obtained from 187 managers of large companies. The results of the analysis in which technology was used as a moderator variable show the existence of the direct influences of technology and organizational structure on the organizational performance. On the other hand, the hypothesis that the interaction of technology and structure has a significant effect on the organizational performance has not been proven

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, teknoloji ve örgüt yapısı arasındaki ilişkilerin örgüt performansını etkileyip etkilemediğinin araştırılmasıdır. Araştırma verileri İstanbul ilinde faaliyet göstermekte olan büyük ölçekli işletmelerin yöneticilerinden elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen toplam 187 adet veriye moderatör ılımlaştırma analiz tekniği uygulanmıştır. Teknolojinin bir moderatör değişken olarak kullanıldığı analizde; analiz sonuçları, örgüt yapısı ve teknolojinin performans üzerindeki direkt etkisini doğrularken, bu değişkenlerin etkileşiminin performans üzerindeki etkisine destek sağlamamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, H., OKAN, T. (2009). A RESEARCH ON THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG TECHNOLOGY, ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND PERFORMANCE. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 57–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/658506

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. AGARWAL, D. (1997). An Empirical investigation of the impact of advanced manufacturing technology on business performance. PhD Dissertation, the City University of New York. AKGÜL, A., ÇEVİK, O. (2005). İstatistiksel analiz teknikleri. Ankara:
  2. Emek Ofset Ltd. Şti. ALBAYRAK, A.S. (2006).Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara:
  3. Asil Yayın Dağıtım. ALEXANDER, J.W., RANDOLPH, W.A. (1985). The Fit between technology and structure as a predictor of performance in nursing subunits. Academy of Management Journal, 28 (4), 844–859. ss. BARON, R.M., KENNY, D.A. (1986). The Moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173- 1182. ss. BRADLEY, S.P., HAUSMAN, J.A., NOLAN, R.L. (1993). Globalization, technology and competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Pres. COVIN, J.G., SLEVEN, D.P., HEELEY, M.B. (2001). Strategic decision making in an intuitive vs technocratic mode: Structural and environmental considerations. Journal of Business Research, 52, 51-67. ss. DAFT, R.L. (2000). Management. 5th ed., New York: The Dryden Press.
  4. DALTON, D.R, TODOR, W.D., SPENDOLINI, M.J., FIELDING, G.J. PORTER, L.W. (1980). Organizational structure and performance: a critical review. Academy of Management Review, Vol.5, No.1, 49-64. ss. DRUCKER, P. (1996). Yönetim uygulaması. İstanbul:
  5. İnkılap Kitapevi. FRY, L.W. (1982). Technology-structure research: three critical issues. Academy of Management Journal, 25 (3), 532–552. ss. GHANI, K.A., JAYABALAN, V. (2000). Advanced manufacturing technology and planned organizational change. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11 (1), 1-18. ss. GHANI, K.A., JAYABALAN, V., SUGUMAR, M. (2002). Impact of advanced manufacturing technology on organizational structure. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13, 157-175. ss. GUPTA, A., COHEN, I., CHIANG, D. (1997). Determining organizational structure choices in advanced manufacturing technology management. Omega, 25 (5), 511-521. ss. HARVEY, E. (1968). Technology and the structure of organization. American Sociological Review, 33, 256–258. ss. HICKSON, D., PUGH, D., PHEYSEY, D. (1969). Operations technology and organization structure: an empirical reappraisal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 378–397. ss. HOFFMAN, J. (1988). The Effect of strategic and operational decision making structure on organizational performance: te