Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

TRADE VOLUME AND RETURN VOLATILITY IN ISTANBUL STOCK EXCHANGE

İSTANBUL MENKUL KIYMETLER BORSASI’NDA İŞLEM HACMİ VE GETİRİ VOLATİLİTESİ

Pages
98–108
Publication Date
2010-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate the presence of the day of the week effect and leverage effect on return volatility.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper examines the relationship between trade volume and Istanbul Stock Exchange composite index ISE-100 return volatility for the period 1990-2008 by including the trade volume and the day of the week effect in to the GARCH, EGARCH and TGARCH models.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The estimation results of the GARCH and TGARCH models show that the effect of trade volume on return volatility is significant in the statistical sense but not positive.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate the presence of the day of the week effect and leverage effect on return volatility.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İşlem Hacmi · Getiri Volatilitesi · Haftanın Günleri Etkisi

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between trade volume and Istanbul Stock Exchange composite index ISE-100 return volatility for the period 1990-2008 by including the trade volume and the day of the week effect in to the GARCH, EGARCH and TGARCH models. The findings indicate the presence of the day of the week effect and leverage effect on return volatility. The estimation results of the GARCH and TGARCH models show that the effect of trade volume on return volatility is significant in the statistical sense but not positive. These findings provide strong evidence against the validity of Sequential Arrival Information and Mixed Distribution hypothesis in ISE

Özet

Bu çalışmada, işlem hacmi ve İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsası bileşik endeks İMKB-100 getiri volatilitesi arasındaki ilişki, 1990-2008 dönemleri için GARCH, EGARCH ve TGARCH modellerine işlem hacmi ve haftanın günleri etkileri ilave edilerek araştırılmaktadır. Bulgular, getiri volatilitesinde haftanın günleri ve kaldıraç etkisinin var olduğuna işaret etmektedir. GARCH ve TGARCH modellerin tahmin sonuçları, işlem hacminin getiri volatilitesi üzerindeki etkisinin anlamlı olduğunu fakat pozitif olmadığını göstermektedir. Bu bulgular, İMKB’de “Ardışık Bilgi Akışı” ve “Karışık Dağılımlar” hipotezlerinin geçerliliğine aykırı kanıtlar sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRAN, B. (2010). TRADE VOLUME AND RETURN VOLATILITY IN ISTANBUL STOCK EXCHANGE. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 98–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/658487

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. AHMED, H.J.A., HASSAN, A., NASIR, A.M.D. (2005). The relationship between trading volume, volatility and stock market returns: a test of mixed distribution hypothesis for a pre and post crisis on Kuala Lumpur stock exchange. Investment Management and Financial Innovations. 3, 146-158. ss. ANDERSEN, T.G. (1996). Return volatility and trading volume: An information flow interpretation of stochastic volatility. Journal of Finance. 51, 169-204. ss. BAKLAVACI, H., KASMAN, A. (2006). An empirical analysis of trading volume and return volatility relationship in the Turkish Stock Market. Ege Academic Review. 6, 115-125. ss. BLACK, F. (1976). Studies of stock price volatility changes. Proceedings of the 1976 meetings of the American Statistical Association. Business and Economics Statistics Section. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association, 177-181.ss. BOLLERSLEV, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics. 31, 307-328. ss. CLARK, P. (1973). A subordinated stochastic process model with finite variance for speculative prices. Econometrica. 91, 135-156. ss. COPELAND, T. (1976). A model of asset trading under the assumption of sequential information arrival. The Journal of Finance. 31, 1149-1168. ss. CORNELL, B. (1981). The relationship between volume and price variability in futures markets. The Journal of Futures Markets. 1, 303-316. ss. EPPS, W., EPPS, M. (1976). The stochastic dependence of security price changes and transaction volumes: Implications for the mixture of distribution hypothesis. Econometrica. 44, 305-321. ss. ESTEVE, V., L-LOPIS, J.S. (2005). Estimating the substitutability between private and public consumption: The case of Spain, 1960-2003. Applied Economics. 37, 2327-2334. ss. FLOROS, C., VOUGAS, D.V. (2007). Trading volume and returns relationship in Greek stock index futures market: GARCH vs. GMM. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics. 12, 98-115. ss. GLOSTEN, L.R., JAGANNATHAN, R., RUNKLE, D.E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. Journal of Finance. 48, 1779-1801. ss. GRAMMATIKOS, T., SAUNDERS, A. (1986). Future price variability: A test of maturity and volume effect. Journal of Business. 59, 319-330. ss. HARRIS, L. (1983). The joint distribution of speculative prices and of daily trading volume. Working Paper. 34-84, Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Department of Finance and Busi