Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

OPENNESS AND INFLATION: EVIDENCE FROM TIME SERIES DATA

DIŞA AÇIKLIK VE ENFLASYON: ZAMAN SERİLERİ VERİLERİ İLE BİR KANIT

Pages
313–322
Publication Date
2010-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Other control variables i.e. money supply, fiscal deficit, exchange rate depreciations, foreign inflation, terms of trade, foreign debt and democracy significantly affect inflation in the expected directions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The paper empirically examines relationship between trade openness and inflation in Pakistan using annual time-series data for the period 1947 to 2007.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Flexible exchange rate regime and an increase in the level of development inflate domestic inflation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Other control variables i.e. money supply, fiscal deficit, exchange rate depreciations, foreign inflation, terms of trade, foreign debt and democracy significantly affect inflation in the expected directions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Dışa Açıklık · Enflasyon · Kambiyo Rejimi

Abstract

The paper empirically examines relationship between trade openness and inflation in Pakistan using annual time-series data for the period 1947 to 2007. The empirical analysis shows that a positive relation holds between trade openness and inflation in Pakistan. The results are robust to controlling for other inflation determining variables and performing sensitivity analysis. Flexible exchange rate regime and an increase in the level of development inflate domestic inflation. Other control variables i.e. money supply, fiscal deficit, exchange rate depreciations, foreign inflation, terms of trade, foreign debt and democracy significantly affect inflation in the expected directions.

Özet

Bu çalışma, 1947–2007 dönemini kapsayan yıllık veriler kullanılarak Pakistan’da dış ticaret alanında dışa açıklık ile enflasyon arasındaki ilişki ampirik olarak incelenmiştir. Ampirik analiz sonuçları, Pakistan’da dışa açıklık ile enflasyon arasında pozitif bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuçlar, enflasyonu belirleyen diğer değişkenlerden ve duyarlılık analizlerinden etkilenmemektedir. Esnek kambiyo rejimi ve gelişme düzeyindeki artış yurtiçi enflasyonu artırmaktadır. Diğer kontrol değişkenleri olan para arzı, mali açık, döviz kurunun değer yitirmesi, dış enflasyon, ticaret haddi, dış borç ve demokrasi enflasyonu beklenen yönde anlamlı bir şekilde etkilemektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

ZAKARIA, M. (2010). OPENNESS AND INFLATION: EVIDENCE FROM TIME SERIES DATA. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 313–322. https://ajindex.com/articles/658478

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. ALFARO, L. (2005),.Inflation, openness, and exchange-rate regimes: the quest for short-term commitment. Journal of Development Economics, 77: 229-49.
  2. ARELLANO, M. (1993). On testing of correlation effects with panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 59: 87-97.
  3. ARELLANO, M., BOND, S., (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58: 277-97.
  4. ASHRA, S. (2002), Inflation and openness: a study of selected developing economies, Working Paper No. 2002 (84), Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India. BATRA, R. (2001). Are tariffs inflationary?. Review of International Economics, 9: 373-82.
  5. BLEANEY, M. (1999). The disappearing openness-inflation relationship: a cross-country analysis of inflation rates. IMF Working Paper No. 1999 (161), Washington DC. CUKIERMAN, A., WEBB, S.B., NEYAPTI, B. (1992). Measuring the independence of central banks and its effects on policy outcomes. World Bank Economic Review, 6(3): 353-98.
  6. EVANS, R.W. (2007). Is openness inflationary? imperfect competition and monetary market power. Working Paper No. 2007 (1), Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. FRANKEL, J. (1999), No single currency regime is right for all countries or at all times. NBER Working Paper No. 1999 (7338), Cambridge Mass. GRUBEN, W.C., McLEOD, D. (2004). The openness–inflation puzzle revisited. Applied Economics Letters, 11: 465-68.
  7. HANIF, M., BATOOL, I. (2006). Openness and inflation: a case study of pakistan, Working Paper No. 2006 (10214), MPRA. IMF (2006). How has globalization affected inflation?. World Economic Outlook, Chapter III, 97-134.
  8. IYOHA, M. A. (1973). Inflation and openness in less developed economies: a cross-country analysis. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 22(1): 31-38.
  9. JIN, J. (2000). Openness and growth: an interpretation of empirical evidence from East Asian countries. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 9: 5-17.
  10. KIM, M., BELADI, H., (2005). Is free trade deflationary. Economic Letters, 89: 343-49.
  11. LANE, P.R. (1997). Inflation in open economies. Journal of International Economics, 42: 327-47.
  12. MARSHALL, M., JAGGERS, G. K. (2009). Polity IV Project: Dataset Users’ Manual, Arlington: Polity IV Project. MUSA, M. (1974). Tariffs and the distribution of income. Journal of Political Economy, 82: 1191-1204.
  13. ROMER, D. (1993). Openness and inflation: theory and evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics,