Journals / Dil Dergisi / 2006 / Sayı: 132

LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGY USAGES OF ENGLISH TEACHER CANDIDATES

İNGİLİZCE ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ DİL ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİ KULLANIMI

Pages
28–37
Publication Date
2006-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Data analyses have been performed by means of t-test and analysis of variance techniques

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the language learning strategy levels of the English teacher candidates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The article begins with various definitions of language learning strategies and classifications made by different authors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Data analyses have been performed by means of t-test and analysis of variance techniques
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Öğrenme Stratejileri · Dil Öğrenme Stratejileri · ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARI

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the language learning strategy levels of the English teacher candidates. The article begins with various definitions of language learning strategies and classifications made by different authors. Then, the findings obtained from the administration of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning are presented. Data analyses have been performed by means of t-test and analysis of variance techniques

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı İngilizce öğretmen adaylarının Dil Öğrenme Stratejilerini kullanım düzeylerini incelemektedir. Öncelikle dil öğrenme stratejilerinin farklı tanımları ele alınmış ve değişik yazarlar tarafından yapılan sınıflandırmalar özetlenmiştir. Daha sonra ise veri toplama aracı olarak kullanılan Dil Öğrenme Stratejileri Ölçeğinin uygulanması sonucu elde edilen veriler sunulmuştur. Verilerin analizi t-testi ve varyans analizi teknikleri kullanılarak yapılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

BEKLEYEN, N. (2006). LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGY USAGES OF ENGLISH TEACHER CANDIDATES. Dil Dergisi, Sayı: 132, 28–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/657185

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Chamot, A.U., & Kupper. L. (1989) Learning Strategies in Foreign Language Instruction. Foreign Language Annals, Vol.22, 13-24.
  2. Cohen, A. (1998). Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. New York: Longman. Cook, V. (1996) Second Language Learning and Language Teaching (2nd edition). Bristol: Arnold. Ehrman, M. E., Leaver, B.L. & Oxford, R. L. (2003). A Brief Overview of Individual Differences in Second Language Learning System, Vol.31, No.3, 313-330.
  3. Griffiths, C. (2003) Patterns of Language Learning Strategy Use. System, Vol.31, No.3, 367- 383. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. (2nd ed.) Oxford: Oxford Unv. Press.
  4. Lee, K. O. (2003)
  5. The Relationship of School Year, Sex and Proficiency on the Use of Language Learning Strategies in Learning English of Korean Junior High School Students. Asian EFL Journal. Vol.14 (http://www.asian-efljournal.com/sept_ 03_ind.html) Oxford, R.L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Bos- ton: Heinle & Heinle. Oxford, R.L., & Ehrman, M. E. (1995). Adults’ Language Learning Strategies in an Intensive Foreign Language Program in the United States. System, Vol.23, No.3, 359-386.
  6. Oxford, R.L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables Affecting Choice of Language Learning Strategies by University Students. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 73, 291- 300. Rubin, J. (1987). Learner Strategies: Theoretical Assumptions, Research History and Typology. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner Strategies and Language Learning (pp. 15-29).
  7. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Sheorey, R. (1999) An examination of language learning strategy use in the setting of an indigenized variety of English. System Vol.28, No.2, 173-190.
  8. Stern, H. H. (1975). What Can We Learn From the Good Language Learner? Canadian Mo- dern Language Review, 31, 304-318.