Journals / Uluslararası tarım araştırmalarında yenilikçi yaklaşımlar dergisi (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Investigation of the Relationship Between the Pod Properties and Quality Values of Some Bean Varieties

Pages
184–194
Publication Date
2022-11-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was noted that there was no significant difference between bean varieties in terms of starch ratio.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is important to know the quality values of the products in terms of production and consumption of plant-based foods, and at the same time, it brings the examined product to the forefront in terms of production and consumption.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this reason, 11 commercial bean varieties were grown as the first crop in Kahramanmaraş ecological conditions in 2018, and in this study, it was aimed to examine the relationship between the pod characteristics and quality values of 11 commercial bean varieties.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was noted that there was no significant difference between bean varieties in terms of starch ratio.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

It is important to know the quality values of the products in terms of production and consumption of plant-based foods, and at the same time, it brings the examined product to the forefront in terms of production and consumption. For this reason, 11 commercial bean varieties were grown as the first crop in Kahramanmaraş ecological conditions in 2018, and in this study, it was aimed to examine the relationship between the pod characteristics and quality values of 11 commercial bean varieties. In the study, the correlations between bean cultivars' pod setting time, pod length, grain yield per plant, thousand-seed weight, pod ratio per plant, protein ratio, oil ratio and starch ratio, as well as all correlations between investigated characteristics were also investigated. It was determined that there were statistically significant (p< 0.01) differences between bean cultivars in terms of pod setting time, pod length, thousand-seed weight, pod ratio and protein content per plant, and significant (p< 0.05) differences in grain yield and oil content per plant. It was noted that there was no significant difference between bean varieties in terms of starch ratio.

🔖

Cite This Article

İdikut, L., Uskutoğlu, D., Çiftçi, S., Zülkadir, G. (2022). Investigation of the Relationship Between the Pod Properties and Quality Values of Some Bean Varieties. Uluslararası tarım araştırmalarında yenilikçi yaklaşımlar dergisi (Online), Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 184–194. https://ajindex.com/articles/655507

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Anlarsal, A.E., Yücel, C., Özveren, D., (2000). Determination of grain yield and yield-related traits and the relationships between these traits in some bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars in Çukurova conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture Forestry, 24: 19-29.
  2. Anonymous (2017). Product report dry beans. Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Development.(TEPGE). Anonymous (2018). Food and Agricultural Organization.(FAO) http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. (Accessed on 17 January 2018).
  3. Atlı, A., Köksal, H. and Dağ, A. (1994). Quality Values in Edible Grain Legumes. Food Industry, 7(3), 44- 48. Aydoğan, S., Şahin, M., Akçacık, A.G., Hamzaoğlu, S., Demir, B., Güçlübilmez, Ç.M., Gür, S. and Keleş, R. (2020). Determination of quality properties of some dry bean genotypes in Konya conditions. Academic Journal of Agriculture 9(2): 259-270 (2020)
  4. Bagheri, M., Kahrizi, D. and Zebarjadi, A. (2015). Study on genetic variation and morpho-phenologic traits in Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Bıharean Bıologıst 11 (1): 43-47.
  5. Barros, M. and Prudencio, S.H. (2016). Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Common Bean. Semina: Agricultural Sciences, 37 (2), 751-762.
  6. Bozoğlu H (1995) A Study on Determination of Genotype × Environment Interaction and Participation Degrees of Some Agricultural Traits in Dry Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Doctoral Thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Institute of Science and Technology, Samsun. Bozoğlu, H., Smiler, A., (1999). Determination of correlations and heritability of some agricultural characteristics in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Turkey 3rd Field Crops Congress (15-18 November 1999),
  7. Volume III, Meadow-Passage Forage Crops and Edible Legumes, 360-365,
  8. Adana. Cengiz, B. (2007): Quality characteristics of some common bean varieties grown in Sakarya and Eskişehir locations. – Master Thesis, Namık Kemal University, Institute of Science, Tekirdag, Turkey (in Turkish with English abstract). Ceyhan E (2004) Effects of Sowing Dates on Some Yield Components and Yield of Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivars. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 9(2): 87-95.
  9. Ceyhan E, Önder M, Kahramani A (2009) Determination of Some Agricultural Characteristics of Bean Genotypes. Selcuk University Selcuk Journal of Food and Agricultural Sciences, 23(49): 67-73.
  10. Çakmak, F., Azkan, N., Kaçar, O., Kapaklü, N., (1999). Determination of agronomic characteristics and yield potential of some dry bean lines. Turkey 3rd Field Crops Congres