Journals / Uluslararası tarım araştırmalarında yenilikçi yaklaşımlar dergisi (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Consumers’ Preferences for Drinking Water in Istanbul City

Pages
218–229
Publication Date
2022-11-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, when the participants ranked carboy water, pet bottle water and network water according to the degree of reliability, the network water was found to be reliable with a large rate of 89.2%. 35.1% of the respondents stated that they would prefer to drink tap water if the Water Administration periodically discloses their water quality reports and indicates that the network water is clean enough.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Water is an indispensable resource for living things to survive.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In accordance this purpose, an online questionnaire was prepared with 274 participants from different age groups, including students from Yıldız Technical University (YTU) Department of Environmental Engineering and their relatives and neighbours, including different ages and occupational groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, when the participants ranked carboy water, pet bottle water and network water according to the degree of reliability, the network water was found to be reliable with a large rate of 89.2%. 35.1% of the respondents stated that they would prefer to drink tap water if the Water Administration periodically discloses their water quality reports and indicates that the network water is clean enough.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Water is an indispensable resource for living things to survive. In addition to its direct consumption, water is also used in the preparation of foods necessary for eating and drinking. Therefore, it is extremely important that the water used is drinkable, healthy and safe. The aim of this study is to determine the place of network water as drinking water in consumer preferences. In accordance this purpose, an online questionnaire was prepared with 274 participants from different age groups, including students from Yıldız Technical University (YTU) Department of Environmental Engineering and their relatives and neighbours, including different ages and occupational groups. With this questionnaire, the factors affecting their water preferences and water usage profiles were determined. As a result of the survey, 54.1% of the participants use carboy water, 33.8% use pet bottle water, 12.1% use network water. The criteria that consumers pay attention to in their water preferences are taste, smell, color, cleanliness and the amount of mineral substances in the water, respectively. The reasons for preferring the carboy water, which is preferred by the majority, are that they find the carboy water cleaner and safer and that it tastes better. On the other hand, participants who preferred tap water stated that 33.3% of them preferred this water because its clean and reliable properties, 33.3% of it was affordable and 22.2% of it was easily accessible. When the degree of trust in the network water was questioned, 12.2% of the participants said that they found the network water safe, 40.5% did not find it safe and 47.3% said they were not sure. In addition, when the participants ranked carboy water, pet bottle water and network water according to the degree of reliability, the network water was found to be reliable with a large rate of 89.2%. 35.1% of the respondents stated that they would prefer to drink tap water if the Water Administration periodically discloses their water quality reports and indicates that the network water is clean enough.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kanat, G., Ergüven, G., Ergüven, G. Ö. (2022). Consumers’ Preferences for Drinking Water in Istanbul City. Uluslararası tarım araştırmalarında yenilikçi yaklaşımlar dergisi (Online), Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 218–229. https://ajindex.com/articles/655505

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ayse, T.A.S., Kahveci, P.B., & Kiraz, E.D.E. (2020). Bir tıp fakültesinde klinik öncesi eğitim alan öğrencilerin içme kullanma suyu tercihleri ve nedenleri. Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi, 77(EK-4), 179-186.
  2. Bayhan, M., &Hançer, N. (1987). Biyokimya ve Besin Kimyası. Devlet Kitapları. İstanbul.
  3. Çeber, K., Aslan, G., Otag, F., Delialioglu, N., Ozturk, C., Babur, C., & Emekdas, G. (2005). Mersin ilinde içme suyu, kullanma suyu, atık su ve deniz sularında Cryptosporidium spp. ookistlerinin araştırılması. Türkiye Parazitol. Derg, 29, 224-8.
  4. Ciner, F. (2017). Su kullanımında tüketici davranışları ve farkındalık-Niğde örneğinde bir alan araştırması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(9), 1019-1026.
  5. Demirci, A. S., Gumus, T., & Demirci, M. (2007). Damacana suların mikrobiyolojik kalitesi üzerine pompa temizliğinin etkisi. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(3), 271-275.
  6. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition, and Allergies (NDA). Scientific opinion on dietary reference values for water. EFSA Journal 2010; 8(3):1459. Gizachew, M., Admesia, A., Wegi, C., Assefa, E. (2022). Bacteriological Contamination of Drinking Water Supply from Protected Water Sources to Point of Use and Water Handling Practices among Beneficiary Households of Boloso Sore Woreda, Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia. International Journal of Microbiology 2020(3):1-10 Istanbulism web page, https://istanbulism.saglik.gov.tr/TR,109716/icme-kullanma-sulari-sehir-sebeke- suyu.html (Erişim Tarihi: 16.04.2022)
  7. Kanat G. (2017). Risk Perception and Bottled Drinking Water Consumption in Istanbul City. GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL, 19-3, 521-532.
  8. Morgan, C.E., Bowling, J.M., Bartram, J., Kayser, G.L. (2021). Attributes of drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene associated with microbiological water quality of stored drinking water in rural schools in Mozambique and Uganda. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 236, 113804 Ondieki, J.K., Akunga, D.N., Warutere, P.N., Kenyanya, O. (2022). Socio-demographic and water handling practices affecting quality of household drinking water in Kisii Town, Kisii County, Kenya. J.K. Helion, 8, 2022, e09419. Tekbas, F., & Ogur, R. (2009). Evsel su arıtma cihazlarına dikkat. TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni, 8(2). Usman, M., Gerber, N., & Pangaribowo, E. (2016). Determinants of household drinking water quality in rural Ethiopia. ZEF-discussion papers on development policy, 220. Uzundumlu, A. S., Fakıoglu, Ö., Kokturk, M., & Temel, T. (2016)