Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 6

Is emergency gastrointestinal system tumor surgery safe under treatment of antitrombotics?

Pages
776–780
Publication Date
2022-11-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: In tertiary centers with high clinical experience, elective and emergency gastrointestinal system tumour surgery can be safely performed under antitrombotic therapy without increasing the thromboembolic risk.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: The use of antitrombotic (antiaggregant and anticoagulant) drugs is increasing all over the world and in our coun- try.
📊
Key Findings & Data:About 12.6% of patients who underwent gastrointestinal tumor surgery receive antitrombotic therapy for various reasons, and in this study, we aimed to demonstrate the safe feasibility of elective or emergency gastrointestinal tumor surgery with the correct perioperative antitrombotic therapy management.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: In tertiary centers with high clinical experience, elective and emergency gastrointestinal system tumour surgery can be safely performed under antitrombotic therapy without increasing the thromboembolic risk.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of antitrombotic (antiaggregant and anticoagulant) drugs is increasing all over the world and in our coun- try. About 12.6% of patients who underwent gastrointestinal tumor surgery receive antitrombotic therapy for various reasons, and in this study, we aimed to demonstrate the safe feasibility of elective or emergency gastrointestinal tumor surgery with the correct perioperative antitrombotic therapy management. METHODS: The patients who were planned for gastrointestinal tumor surgery under antitrombotic treatment were analyzed in three groups as those whose pre-operative treatment management treatment was discontinued, those who underwent bridging treat- ment, and those whose treatment continued. Anti-embolic stockings or intermittent pneumatic compression devices were applied to all patients preoperatively and postoperatively as mechanical prophylaxis. Post-operative complications, especially post-operative bleeding and thrombosis, were evaluated using the Clavien–Dindo post-operative complication classification. RESULTS: When patients who were under antithrombotic therapy, whose therapy was discontinued, and who underwent surgery under bridging therapy, no significant difference was found between the three groups in terms of bleeding complications. CONCLUSION: In tertiary centers with high clinical experience, elective and emergency gastrointestinal system tumour surgery can be safely performed under antitrombotic therapy without increasing the thromboembolic risk.

🔖

Cite This Article

İlhan, M., Alizade, E., Uzunyolcu, G., Gök, A. F. K., Gunay, K., Ertekin, C., Kurtoğlu, M. (2022). Is emergency gastrointestinal system tumor surgery safe under treatment of antitrombotics?. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 6, 776–780. https://ajindex.com/articles/655418

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Demir M, Erdemli B, Kurtoğlu M. Ulusal Venöz Tromboembolizm Pro- filaksi ve Tedavi Kılavuzu. Vol. 5. 2010. p. 40–51
  2. Malas MB, Naazie IN, Elsayed N, Mathlouthi A, Marmor R, Clary B. Thromboembolism risk of COVID-19 is high and associated with a higher risk of mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClin- icalMedicine 2020;29:100639
  3. Kearon C, Hirsh J. Management of anticoagulation before and after elec- tive surgery. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1506–11
  4. Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, de Vos CB, Crijns HJ, Lip GY. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest. 2010;138:1093–100
  5. Grant PJ, Greene MT, Chopra V, Bernstein SJ, Hofer TP, Flanders SA. Assessing the caprini score for risk assessment of venous thromboem- bolism in hospitalized medical patients. Am J Med 2016;129:528–35
  6. Yamaji Y, Yasunaga H, Hirata Y, Yamada A, Yoshida S, Horiguchi H, et al. Association between colorectal cancer and atherosclerotic dis- eases: A study using a national ınpatient database in Japan. Dig Dis Sci 2016;61:1677–85
  7. Jafri SM, Mehta TP. Periprocedural management of anticoagulation in patients on extended warfarin therapy. Semin Thromb Hemost 2004;30:657–64
  8. Palareti G, Legnani C. Warfarin withdrawal. Pharmacokinetic-pharma- codynamic considerations. Clin Pharmacokinet 1996;30:300–13
  9. White RH, McKittrick T, Hutchinson R, Twitchell J. Temporary discon- tinuation of warfarin therapy: Changes in the international normalized ratio. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:40–2
  10. Despotis GJ, Filos KS, Zoys TN, Hogue CW, Spitznagel E, Lappas DG. Factors associated with excessive postoperative blood loss and hemostatic transfusion requirements: A multivariate analysis in cardiac surgical pa- tients. Anesth Analg 1996;82:13–21
  11. Crowther MA, Julian J, McCarty D, Douketis J, Kovacs M, Biagoni L, et al. Treatment of warfarin-associated coagulopathy with oral vitamin K: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England) 2000;356:1551–3
  12. Travis S, Wray R, Harrison K. Perioperative anticoagulant control. Br J Surg 1989;76:1107–8
  13. Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Kaatz S, Becker RC, Caprini JA, Dunn AS, et al. Perioperative bridging anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2015;373:823–33
  14. Hewitt RL, Chun KL, Flint LM. Current clinical concepts in periopera- tive anticoagulation. Am Surg 1999;65:270–3
  15. Devereaux PJ, Mrkobra