Journals / Reforma / 2018 / Sayı: 79

THE EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE VOLATILITY ON MONEY SUPPLY IN KYRGYZSTAN

Journal
Reforma
Pages
52–59
Publication Date
2018-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, more concrete recommendations on the effectiveness of monetary policy in Kyrgyzstan are required to make more detailed analysis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Since Kyrgyzstan is a country dependent on imports in most commodities, the Central Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic sees the exchange rates’ stability as an important instrument of price stabilizing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, such a policy may deteriorate the stability of the total money supply and adversely affect the economy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, more concrete recommendations on the effectiveness of monetary policy in Kyrgyzstan are required to make more detailed analysis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002-2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:exchange rate · money supply · international reserves

Abstract

Since Kyrgyzstan is a country dependent on imports in most commodities, the Central Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic sees the exchange rates’ stability as an important instrument of price stabilizing. However, such a policy may deteriorate the stability of the total money supply and adversely affect the economy. Therefore, in this study, it is aimed to examine the relations between exchange rate, money supply and official reserves by using 2002-2016 monthly data and cointegration method. Empirical results have shown that a change in the exchange rate causes opposite changes in both the reserves and the money supply as a result of the central bank’s interventions. However, more concrete recommendations on the effectiveness of monetary policy in Kyrgyzstan are required to make more detailed analysis.

Özet

Since Kyrgyzstan is a country dependent on imports in most commodities, the Central Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic sees the exchange rates’ stability as an important instrument of price stabilizing. However, such a policy may deteriorate the stability of the total money supply and adversely affect the economy. Therefore, in this study, it is aimed to examine the relations between exchange rate, money supply and official reserves by using 2002-2016 monthly data and cointegration method. Empirical results have shown that a change in the exchange rate causes opposite changes in both the reserves and the money supply as a result of the central bank’s interventions. However, more concrete recommendations on the effectiveness of monetary policy in Kyrgyzstan are required to make more detailed analysis.

🔖

Cite This Article

GANİEV, J., BAİGONUSHOVA, D. (2018). THE EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE VOLATILITY ON MONEY SUPPLY IN KYRGYZSTAN. Reforma, Sayı: 79, 52–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/65538

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Afzal, M. (2010). “Exchange Rate and Reserves in Asian Countries: Causality Test”. Global Economic Review 39:2, p. 215-223. DOI: 10.1080/1226508X.2010.483839 Calvo, G. ve Reinhart, C. M. (1999). “When capital inflows come to a sudden stop: consequences and policy options”, in: P. Kenen and A. Swoboda (Eds.) Key Issues in Reform of the International Monetary and Financial System (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund). Cote, A. (1994). “Exchange Rate Volatility and Trade”, Working Paper No. 95-5 (Ottawa, Ontario: Bank of Canada). Gartner, M. (1987). “Intervention Policy under Floating Exchange Rates: An Analysis of the Swiss Case”. Economica, p. 439-53.
  2. Gerni, C., Sarı, S., Özdemir, D., Emsen, Ö.S. (2013). “Döviz Kuru Oynaklığı, Rezerv Oynaklığı ve Reel Faiz Oranlarının Dış Ticaret Üzerindeki Etkileri: Geçiş Ekonomileri Üzerine Uygulamalar”. Proceedings book of International Conference on Eurasian Economies, s. 412-419.
  3. Hussain, I. (2002). “Why reserves”, The Daily Dawn, August. Hviding, K., Nowak, M. ve Ricci, L. A. (2004). “Can Higher Reserves Help Reduce Exchange Rate Volatility? An Empirical Investigation”, Luiss Lab of European Economics Working Document No. 13 (Rome: Luiss Lab of European Economics). IMF, Annual Report 2014.
  4. Mastropasqua, C., Micossi, S. ve Rinaldi, R. (1988). “Interventions, Sterilization and Monetary Policy in European Monetary System Countries, 1979-1987,” in The European Monetary System: Proceedings of a Conference Organised by the Banca d’ Italia, STEP, and CEPR, Francesco Giavazzi, Stefano Micossi, and Marcus Miller, eds., Cambridge University Press, p. 252-87.
  5. Narayan, P.K. (2005). “The Saving and Investment Nexus for China: Evidence from Cointegration Tests”. Applied Economics 37(17), p. 1979-1990.
  6. Neely, C.J. (2000). “Are Changes in Foreign Exchange Reserves Well Correlated with Official Intervention?” Federal Reserve Bank Of St. Louis. 82(5), p. 17-31.
  7. Obstfeld, M. (1983). “Exchange Rates, Inflation, and the Sterilization Problem: Germany, 1975-1981” European Economic Review March/April, p. 161-189.
  8. Ozturk, I. (2006). “Exchange Rate Volatility and Trade: A Literature Survey”. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies 3-1, p. 85-102.
  9. Pesaran, H.M. ve Shin, Y. (1995). “Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis”. DAE Working Paper Series No. 9514. Cambridge: Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge. Pesaran, H.M. ve Shin, Y. (1999). “Autoregres