Journals / Reforma / 2018 / Sayı: 80

THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY IN HOUSEHOLDS IN KYRGYZSTAN

Journal
Reforma
Pages
28–34
Publication Date
2018-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, this article examines the economic aspects of animal husbandry in Kyrgyzstan on the basis of a household survey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Despite the fact that agriculture is one of the important sectors of the economy and is growing at a certain pace, its share in the gross domestic product decreases every year.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, an increase in productivity and income in this sector will affect the well-being of a quarter of the workforce and the entire rural population, which is two-thirds of the country’s total population.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, this article examines the economic aspects of animal husbandry in Kyrgyzstan on the basis of a household survey.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:animal husbandry · economy · agriculture

Abstract

Despite the fact that agriculture is one of the important sectors of the economy and is growing at a certain pace, its share in the gross domestic product decreases every year. In total a quarter of the workforce is employed in the agricultural sector. Therefore, an increase in productivity and income in this sector will affect the well-being of a quarter of the workforce and the entire rural population, which is two-thirds of the country’s total population. Thus, this article examines the economic aspects of animal husbandry in Kyrgyzstan on the basis of a household survey.

Özet

Despite the fact that agriculture is one of the important sectors of the economy and is growing at a certain pace, its share in the gross domestic product decreases every year. In total a quarter of the workforce is employed in the agricultural sector. Therefore, an increase in productivity and income in this sector will affect the well-being of a quarter of the workforce and the entire rural population, which is two-thirds of the country’s total population. Thus, this article examines the economic aspects of animal husbandry in Kyrgyzstan on the basis of a household survey.

🔖

Cite This Article

MAMATOV, N., GANİEV, J., ABDİEVA, R., BAİGONUSHOVA, D. (2018). THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY IN HOUSEHOLDS IN KYRGYZSTAN. Reforma, Sayı: 80, 28–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/65532

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Пиримбаев, Ж. Кыргыз Республикасынын экономикасы: окуу китеби. – Бишкек: КТМУ, 2007. Герасимов, А.П. Экономические аспекты формирования скотоводства на этапах социального развития региона // Региональная экономика: теория и практика. – 2012. – №17. – С. 51-54. Ситников, Н.П. Управление экономической эффективностью животноводства // Сельскохозяйственные науки и агропромышленный комплекс на рубеже веков. – 2014. – №6. – С. 172-177. Морозов, Н.М. Модернизация животноводства – теоретические и организационно-экономические аспекты // Техника и оборудование для села. – 2016. – №3. – С. 38-44. Шумакова, О.В., Емельяненко, К.В. Приоритетные направления формирования экономической эффективности молочного животноводства: Материалы международной научно-практической конференции // Современное состояние, перспективы развития молочного животноводства и переработки сельскохозяйственной продукции. – 2016. – С. 7-10. Хаустова, Г.И., Панина, Е.Б., Степанова, Т.А. (2016). Оценка влияния факторов на финансовую устойчивость животноводческих организаций // Экономика: вчера, сегодня, завтра. Том:6. №10А. – С. 117-129. КРдагы малга жана үй канаттууларга санак жүргүзүүнүн жыйынтыгы (2017-жылдын аягына карата). – Бишкек: Кыргыз Республикасынын Улуттук статистика комитети, 2018.
  2. Mundan, D. et al. Hayvancılık Sektörünün Kalkınma ve Sanayileşme Açısından Değerlendirilmesi: Adıyaman İli Örneği // Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi. – 2017. – № 9(17). – Р. 237-244.
  3. Vural, H., Fidan, H. Türkıye’de Hayvansal Üretim ve Hayvancılık İşletmelerinin Özellikleri // Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi. – 2007. – № 13(2). – P.49-59.
  4. Köseman, A., Şeker, İ. Malatya İli Sığır, Koyun ve Keçi Yetiştiriciliğinin Mevcut Durumu // F.Ü.Sağ.Bil.Vet.Derg. – 2015. – № 29 (2). – P. 137-143.
  5. Demir, P., Aral, Y., Sarıözkan, S. Kars İli Süt Sığırcılık İşletmelerinin Sosyo-Ekonomik Yapısı ve Üretim Maliyetleri // YYU Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi. – 2014. – № 25(1). – P. 1-6.
  6. Can, M.F., Sakarya, E. Dünya ve Türkiye’de Tarım ve Hayvancılık Kooperatiflerinin Tarihsel Gelişimi, İktisadi Önemi ve Mevcut Durumu // Vet. Hekim. Der. Dergisi. – 2012. – № 83(1). – P. 27-36.
  7. Mandaloğlu, M. Bozkır Türklerinde Ekonominin Hayvancılık ve Tarıma Dayalı Olarak Değerlendirilmesi // İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 2014. –№ 3(1). – P. 75-93.
  8. Sarıca, Ş., Ulutaş, Z., Şahin, A. Türkiye Hayvancılığının Mevcut Durumu // GOÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. – 2004. – № 21(1). – P. 91-98.