Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

YÜKSEK RİSKLİ HASTALAR İÇİN PREOPERATİF YOĞUN BAKIM YATAĞI AYRILMASININ POSTOPERATİF YERİNDELİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ: RETROSPEKTİF ÇALIŞMA

POSTOPERATIVE APPROPRIATENESS OF ASSIGNING AN INTENSIVE CARE BED PREOPERATIVELY FOR HIGH-RISK PATIENTS: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Pages
439–445
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

They include: severity of accompanying disease, respiratory and neurological status, renal disease, active infection, number of medications, emergency vs. elective status, complexity and duration of operation, re-operation, need for transfusion and perioperativenegative experiences

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: To retrospectively evaluate the correlation between predicted preoperativeintensive care unit need and postoperative ICU bed need.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Method: Adult patients who underwent surgical intervention (except for cardiovascular and intracranial surgeries) between January 2010 and January 2012, and were predicted to need intensive care unit during preoperative evaluation, were included in the study.Patients were divided into those who required intensive care unit support (Group I) and thosewho did not require intensive care unit support (Group II) in the postoperative period.Demographic data, properties of anesthesia, surgery and mortality were recorded.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:They include: severity of accompanying disease, respiratory and neurological status, renal disease, active infection, number of medications, emergency vs. elective status, complexity and duration of operation, re-operation, need for transfusion and perioperativenegative experiences
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: To retrospectively evaluate the correlation between predicted preoperativeintensive care unit need and postoperative ICU bed need. Materials and Method: Adult patients who underwent surgical intervention (except for cardiovascular and intracranial surgeries) between January 2010 and January 2012, and were predicted to need intensive care unit during preoperative evaluation, were included in the study.Patients were divided into those who required intensive care unit support (Group I) and thosewho did not require intensive care unit support (Group II) in the postoperative period.Demographic data, properties of anesthesia, surgery and mortality were recorded. Results: Data of 372 patients were reviewed. Of these patients, 195 were in Group I and177 were in Group II. The number of drugs used, severity of the accompanying disease, operation duration, complexity, emergency status and re-operation, transfusion need, negative eventsoccurring in the perioperative period and mortality were all higher in Group I, while age andregional anesthesia application were higher in Group II. Respiratory and neurological problems,renal disease and active infection rates were also higher in Group I. Conclusion: Several variables can be utilized in determining the need for postoperativeintensive care unit bed. They include: severity of accompanying disease, respiratory and neurological status, renal disease, active infection, number of medications, emergency vs. elective status, complexity and duration of operation, re-operation, need for transfusion and perioperativenegative experiences

Özet

Giriş: Postoperatif yoğun bakım ihtiyacının preoperative öngörüsü ile postoperative gereksinimi arasındaki ilişkinin retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesidir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya Ocak 2010 ve Ocak 2012 yılları arasında kardiyovasküler ve intrakranial cerrahi dışında cerrahi müdahale geçiren, preoperatif değerlendirmede yoğun bakım ihtiyacı olabileceği öngörülen yetişkin hastalar alındı. Hastalar postoperatif dönemde yoğun bakımihtiyacı olup (Grup I) olmamasına (Grup II) göre iki gruba ayrıldı. Demografik veriler, anestezi vecerrahinin özellikleri ve mortalite kaydedildi. Bulgular: Üç yüz yetmiş iki hastanın verilerine ulaşıldı. Bunların 195'i Grup I ve 177'i Grup IIidi. Grup I'de kullanılan ilaç sayısı, eşlik eden hastalığın şiddeti, operasyonun süresi, kompleksliği,acil ve reoperasyon olması, transfüzyon ihtiyacı, peroperatif dönemde yaşanan olumsuzluklar vemortalite daha yüksek iken Grup II'de yaş ve rejyonal anestezi uygulamaları daha fazla bulundu.Solunumsal, nörolojik, renal hastalık ve aktif enfeksiyonu oranı Grup I'de daha fazlaydı. Sonuç: Eşlik eden hastalığın şiddeti, solunumsal, nörolojik, renal hastalık ve aktif enfeksiyon,ilaç sayısı, operasyonun süresi, komplekliği, acil ve reoperasyon olması, transfüzyon ihtiyacı, peroperatif dönemde yaşanan olumsuzluklar postoperatif yoğun bakım ihtiyacını tespit etmede kullanılabilir

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYAR, M. K., DEMİREL, İ., ÖZER, A. B., ERHAN, Ö. L., DÜZGÖL, Ö. (2022). YÜKSEK RİSKLİ HASTALAR İÇİN PREOPERATİF YOĞUN BAKIM YATAĞI AYRILMASININ POSTOPERATİF YERİNDELİĞİNİN İNCELENMESİ: RETROSPEKTİF ÇALIŞMA. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 439–445. https://ajindex.com/articles/654788

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Murphy JJ, Swanson T, Ansermino M, Milner R. The frequency of apneas in premature infants after inguinal hernia repair: Do they need overnight monitoring in the intensive care unit? J Pediatr Surg 2008;43(5):865-8. (PMID:18485955). Kaufmann SC, Wu CL, Pronovost PJ, Jermyn RM, Fleisher LA. The association of intraoperative neuraxial anesthesia on anticipated admission to the intensive care unit. J Clin Anesth 2002;14(6):432-6. (PMID:12393111). Flancbaum L, Ziegler DW, Choban PS. Preoperative intensive care unit admission and hemodynamic monitoring in patients scheduled for major elective noncardiac surgery: A retrospective review of 95 patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1998;12(1):3-9. (PMID:9509349). McAlister FA, Bertsch K, Man J, Bradley J, Jacka M. Incidence of and risk factors for pulmonary complications after nonthoracic surgery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171(5):514-7. (PMID:15563632). Ghotkar SV, Grayson AD, Fabri BM, Dihmis WC, Pullan DM. Preoperative calculation of risk for prolonged intensive care unit stay following coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;1:1-14. (PMID:16737548). Weissman C, Klein N. Pre-operative evaluation using therapeutic intensity scoring. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011;28(1):20-8. (PMID:20827212). Klein N, Weissman C. Evaluating intraoperative therapeutic and diagnostic interventions. Anesth Analg 2002;95(5):1373- 80. (PMID:12401628). Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: A scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 1991;78(3):355-60. (PMID:2021856). Mahajan RP. The WHO surgical checklist. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2011;25(2):161-8.
  2. Treacher DF, Grant IS. Critical care and emergency medicine. In: Boon NA (Ed). Davidson's Principles and Practice of Medicine. 20th edition, Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone 2006, pp 175-201.
  3. Bennett D, Bion J. ABC of intensive care: organisation of intensive care. BMJ 1999;318(7196):1468-70. (PMID:10346777). Wolters U, Wolf T, Stützer H, Schröder T. ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth 1996;77(2):217-22. (PMID:8881629). de Lima LB, Borges D, da Costa S, Rabelo ER. Classification of patients according to the degree of dependence on nursing care and illness severity in a post-anesthesia care unit. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2010;18(5):881-7. (PMID:21120406). Sobol JB, Wunsch H. Triage of high-risk surgical patients for intensive care. Critical Care 2011;15(2):217. (PMID:21457500). Moller AM, Maaloe R, Pedersen