Journals / Turkish Journal of Urology / 2017 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4

Surgical complications of open nephrectomy in living related donors in Yemen: a prospective study

Yemen’de canlı akraba donörlerde açık nefrektominin cerrahi komplikasyonları: prospektif bir çalışma

Pages
549–552
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (range: 2-4 days).Conclusion: We found that most of the complications of open living donor nephrectomy are of grade I andhigher grade complications are negligible compared to the advantages for the recipients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Renal transplantation from living related donor is the best treatment option for chronic renal failurewith experience for more than 50 years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this prospective study we described the surgical complications of opendonor nephrectomies by Clavien grading system.Material and methods: Between May 2002 and December 2014, one hundred and seventy-two potentiallyhealthy kidney donors were admitted to Althawrah General Hospital, Ibn–Sina Hospital and Military Hospital.The median age was 34 years (19-60 years) with male predominance in 64.5% of the cases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (range: 2-4 days).Conclusion: We found that most of the complications of open living donor nephrectomy are of grade I andhigher grade complications are negligible compared to the advantages for the recipients.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Renal transplantation from living related donor is the best treatment option for chronic renal failurewith experience for more than 50 years. However, this procedure may expose the health and even the life ofotherwise normal individuals to risk. In this prospective study we described the surgical complications of opendonor nephrectomies by Clavien grading system.Material and methods: Between May 2002 and December 2014, one hundred and seventy-two potentiallyhealthy kidney donors were admitted to Althawrah General Hospital, Ibn–Sina Hospital and Military Hospital.The median age was 34 years (19-60 years) with male predominance in 64.5% of the cases. This prospectivedescriptive study reviews intra-, and post-operative surgical complications using Clavien grading system forsurgical complications.Results: The procedure was done via supracostal lumbotomy incision (above 12th rib) in 112 cases (65.1%) andtranscostal incision with resection of 11th rib in 60 cases (34.9%). Left kidney was taken in most of the cases(68%) while right kidney in the remaining 42% with an average warm ischemia time of 31 seconds (range, 22-34 seconds). Surgical complications by Clavien grading system were observed in 18.6% of the cases (32 cases).Grade 1 in 28 (16.4%); Grade 2 in 2 (1.2%) and Grade 3 in 2 cases (1.2%) were detected. There was no grade 4or 5 cases in our series. Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (range: 2-4 days).Conclusion: We found that most of the complications of open living donor nephrectomy are of grade I andhigher grade complications are negligible compared to the advantages for the recipients.

Özet

Amaç: Canlı akraba donörlerden böbrek nakli 50 yılı aşkın deneyimle kronik böbrek yetmezliğinin en iyi tedavi seçeneğidir. Ancak aksi durumlarda bu cerrahi normal kişilerin sağlığını hatta yaşamını riske atabilmektedir. Bu prospektif çalışmada Clavien derecelendirme sistemine göre açık donör nefrektomisinin cerrahi komplikasyonlarını tanımladık. Gereç ve yöntemler: Mayıs 2002 ile Aralık 2014 arasında lthawrah Hastanesi, Ibn–Sina Hastanesi ve Asker Hastanesine 172 potansiyel olarak sağlıklı böbrek donörü kabul edilmiştir. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 34 yıl (19-60 yıl) olup erkek hastalar çoğunluktaydı (%64,5) Bu prospektif tanımlayıcı çalışmada cerrahi komplikasyonlar için Clavien derecelendime sistemini kullanarak intra- ve postoperatif cerrahi komplikasyonlar gözden geçirilmiştir. Bulgular: Cerrahi girişim 112 (%65,1) olguda 12. kostanın üstünden suprakostal lumbotomi kesisinden, 60 (%34,9) olguda 11. kostayı keserek transkostal yolla uygulanmıştır. Olguların çoğunda (68%) sol böbrek, geri kalan %42’sinde ise sağ böbrek alınmış olup ortalama sıcak iskemi süresi 31 (22-34 ) saniyeydi. Olguların %18,6’sında (n=32) Clavien derecelendirme sistemine göre komplikasyonlar gözlenmiştir. Bu komplikasyonlar 1. (n=28; %16,4), 2. (n=2; %1,2)ve 3. (n=2; %1,2) derecede idi. Serimizde 4. veya 5. derecede komplikasyon yoktu. Ortalama postoperatif hastanede kalış süresi 3 (2-4) gün idi. Sonuç: Canlı vericilerde açık cerrahi nefrektomi komplikasyonlarının çoğunlukla 1. derecede olduğunu, daha yüksek derecede komplikasyonların ihmal edilebilir düzeyde olduğunu saptadık

🔖

Cite This Article

TELHA, K. A., KATAA, M. A. A., AL-KOHLANY, K. M., BADANY, T. H. A., ALNONO, I. H. (2022). Surgical complications of open nephrectomy in living related donors in Yemen: a prospective study. Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4, 549–552. https://ajindex.com/articles/654605

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Antcliffe D, Nanidis TG, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP, Papalois VE. A meta-analysis of mini-open versus standard open and laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 2009;22:463-74. [CrossRef] Kok NF, Alwayn IP, Lind MY, Tran KT, Weimar W, IJzermans JN. Donor nephrectomy: mini-incision muscle-splitting open approach versus laparoscopy. Transplantation 2006;81:881-7. [CrossRef] Jacobs S, Cho E, Foster C, Liao P, Bartlett ST. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy the University of Maryland 6-year experience. J Urol 2004;171:47-51. [CrossRef] Bergman S, Feldman LS, Anidjar M, Demyttenaere SV, Carli F, Metrakos P, et al. First do no harm: monitoring outcomes during the transition from open to laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in a Canadian center. Can J Surg 2008;51:103-10.
  2. Franceschin M, Capocasale E, Dalla Valle R, Mazzoni MP, Busi N, Sianesi M. Living donor nephrectomy: open versus laparoscopic technique. Urologia 2009;76:36-40.
  3. Nicholson ML, Kaushik M, Lewis GR, Brook NR, Bagul A, Kay MD, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg 2010;97:21-8. [CrossRef] Wilson CH, Bhatti AA, Rix DA, Soomro NA. Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: UK experience. BJU Int 2005;95:131-5. [CrossRef] Kocak B, Koffron AJ, Baker TB, Salvalaggio PR, Kaufman DB, Fryer JP, et al. Proposed classification of complications after live donor nephrectomy. Urology 2006;67:927-31. [CrossRef] Friedman AL, Peters TG, Jones KW, Boulware LE, Ratner LE. Fatal and nonfatal hemorrhagic complications of living kidney donation. Ann Surg 2006;243:126-30. [CrossRef] Ferrari P, Weimar W, Johnson RJ, Lim WH, Tinckam KJ. Kidney paired donation: principles, protocols and programs. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2015;30:1276-85. [CrossRef] Rocca JP, Davis E, Edye M. Live-donor nephrectomy. Mt Sinai J Med 2012;79:330-41. [CrossRef] Egawa H, Tanabe K, Fukushima N, Date H, Sugitani A, Haga H. Current status of organ transplantation in Japan. Am J Transplant 2012;12:523-30. [CrossRef] Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2014;240:2005-13.
  4. Serrano OK, Kirchner V, Bangdiwala A, Vock DM, Dunn TB, Finger EB, et al. Evolution of Living Donor Nephrectomy at a Single Center: Long-term Outcomes With 4 Different Techniques in Greater Than 4000 Donors Over 50 Years. Transplantation 2016;100:1299-305. [CrossRef] Dageforde LA, Moore D