Journals / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 4

Identification, characterization, and expression profiling of salt-stress tolerant proton gradient regulator 5 (PGR5) in Gossypium arboreum

Pages
889–898
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed a 7-fold increased expression of GPGR5 in leaf tissue in salt stress and almost no induction of transcription in root and stem tissues in salt stress.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Salinity is among the significant abiotic stresses adversely affecting plant development and yield for a wide range of crops.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For quantitative and qualitative expression studies of proton gradient regulator 5 (PGR5) under salt stress, differential display RT-PCR and rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) were performed on salt-stress responsive Gossypium arboreum.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed a 7-fold increased expression of GPGR5 in leaf tissue in salt stress and almost no induction of transcription in root and stem tissues in salt stress.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Salinity is among the significant abiotic stresses adversely affecting plant development and yield for a wide range of crops. For quantitative and qualitative expression studies of proton gradient regulator 5 (PGR5) under salt stress, differential display RT-PCR and rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) were performed on salt-stress responsive Gossypium arboreum. Alignment of genomic and cDNA sequences revealed that the GPGR5 gene comprises a single open reading frame of 96 amino acids and contains no introns. Alignment of cotton GPGR5 complete amino acid sequence with PGR5 from other plants revealed the following identities: Gossypium raimondii (97%), Amaranthus hybridus (72%), Vitis vinifera (69%), Medicago truncatula (68%), Cucumis melo (62%), Arabidopsis thaliana (62%), Portulaca oleracea (61%), Portulaca grandiflora (60%), and Zea mays (55%). The expression profile was studied in different plant tissues (stem, leaf, and root) under the abiotic stresses salt, drought, and cold. The results showed a 7-fold increased expression of GPGR5 in leaf tissue in salt stress and almost no induction of transcription in root and stem tissues in salt stress. This gene has a good expression pattern under cold stress compared to salt and drought. In future studies, GPGR5 may be used as a prognostic marker for the development of abiotic-stress-tolerant plants.

🔖

Cite This Article

HUSNAIN, T., RASHID, B., SHAHID, M. N., MOHAMED, B., WATTOO, J. I., KIANI, M. S., JAMAL, A., AFTAB, B. (2022). Identification, characterization, and expression profiling of salt-stress tolerant proton gradient regulator 5 (PGR5) in Gossypium arboreum. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 4, 889–898. https://ajindex.com/articles/654424

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Altschul FW, Gish W, Miller EW, Myers, Lipman DJ (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403-410.
  2. Ashraf M (2002). Salt tolerance of cotton: some new advances. Crit Rev Plant Sci 21: 1-32.
  3. Bartels D, Sunkar R (2005). Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24: 23-58.
  4. Bray EA, Bailey-Serres J, Weretilnyk E (2000). Responses to abiotic stresses. In: Gruissem W, Buchannan B, Jones R, editors. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. Rockville, MD, USA: Ameri Soc of Plant Physiologists, pp. 1158-1249.
  5. Brinboim HC, Doly J (1979). A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 7: 1513-1523.
  6. Chinnusamy V, Zhu J, Zhu JK (2007). Cold stress regulation of gene expression in plants. Trends Plant Sci 12: 444-451.
  7. Dalcorso G, Pesaresi P, Masiero S, Aseeva E, Schunemann D, Finazzi G, Joliot P, Barbato R, Leister D (2008). A complex containing PGRL1 and PGR5 is involved in the switch between linear and cyclic electron flow in Arabidopsis. Cell 132: 273-285.
  8. DeWitt ND, Hong B, Sussman MR, Harper JF (1996). Targeting of two Arabidopsis H+-ATPase isoforms to the plasma membrane. Plant Physiol 112: 833-844.
  9. Grover A, Kapoor A, Lakshmi OS, Agarwal S, Sahi C, Agarwal SK, Agarwal M, Dubey H (2001). Understanding molecular alphabets of the plant abiotic stress responses. Curr Sci 80: 206-216.
  10. Guern J, Mathieu Y, Kurkdjian A, Manigault P, Manigault J, Zielinska T, Gillet B, Beloeil JC, Lallemand JY (1989). Regulation of vacuolar pH in plant cells. Plant Physiol 89: 27-36.
  11. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950). The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Cric. 347. Univ of Calif Agric Exp Station, Berkley, CA, USA. Jaakola L, Pirttila AM, Halonen M, Hohtola A (2001). Isolation of high quality RNA from bilberry (Vacciniummyrtillus L.) fruit. Mol Biotechnol 19: 201-203.
  12. Knight H, Knight MR (2001). Abiotic stress signalling pathways: specificity and cross-talk. Trends Plant Sci 6: 262-267.
  13. Lee SH, Lee KW, Kim KY, Choi GJ, Yoon SH, Ji HC, Seo S, Lim YC, Ahsan N (2009). Identification of salt-stress induced differentially expressed genes in barley leaves using the annealing control-primer-based gene fishing technique. Afri J Biotechnol 8: 1326-1331.
  14. Li F, Fan G, Wang K, Sun F, Yuan Y, Song G, Li Q, Ma Z, Lu C, Zou C et al. (2014). Genome sequence of the cultivated cotton Gossypium arboreum.Nature Genetics 46: 567-572.
  15. Liang P, Pardee AB (1992). Differential display of eukaryotic messenger RNA