SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Istanbul Business Research / 2019 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1

The Role Of Corporate Social Responsibility In The Effect Of Strategical Leadership On Corporate Reputation Perception

Yöneticilerin Stratejik Liderlik Davranışlarının Kurumsal İtibar Algısı Üzerine Etkisinde Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluğun (KSS) Rolü

Seda KIZIL
Atılhan NAKTİYOK
Pages
64–83
Publication Date
2019-05-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of research it has been determined that strategic leadership behaviors of the executives has a positive effect on corporate reputation perception of the employees and CSR plays a a partial mediating role on the relationship between strategic leadership-corporate reputation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The primary aim of this research is to examine the role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the effect of strategic leadership behaviors of the executives on corporate reputation perception which develops in employees.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this research, a scale was used to collect data from 517 employees of 3 private hospitals in Trabzon and collected data was analyzed with required statistical analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of research it has been determined that strategic leadership behaviors of the executives has a positive effect on corporate reputation perception of the employees and CSR plays a a partial mediating role on the relationship between strategic leadership-corporate reputation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Stratejik liderlik · Kurumsal itibar · Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk

Abstract

The primary aim of this research is to examine the role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the effect of strategic leadership behaviors of the executives on corporate reputation perception which develops in employees. In this research, a scale was used to collect data from 517 employees of 3 private hospitals in Trabzon and collected data was analyzed with required statistical analysis. As a result of research it has been determined that strategic leadership behaviors of the executives has a positive effect on corporate reputation perception of the employees and CSR plays a a partial mediating role on the relationship between strategic leadership-corporate reputation.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, yöneticilerin göstermiş olduğu stratejik liderlik davranışlarının çalışanlarda oluşan kurumsal itibar algısı üzerindeki etkisinde kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun (KSS) rolünü incelemektir. Araştırmada, 2016 yılında Trabzon’da faaliyet gösteren üç özel hastanede görev yapan 517 çalışandan anket tekniği ile veri toplanmıştır ve bu veriler uygun analizlere tabi tutulmuştur. Araştırma sonucunda yöneticilerin stratejik liderlik davranışlarının çalışanların kurumsal itibar algısını olumlu yönde etkilediği ve KSS faaliyetlerinin stratejik liderlik ile kurumsal itibar arasındaki ilişkide kısmi aracılık rolü üstlendiği belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIZIL, S., NAKTİYOK, A. (2019). The Role Of Corporate Social Responsibility In The Effect Of Strategical Leadership On Corporate Reputation Perception. Istanbul Business Research, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1, 64–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/65391

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Altınkurt, Y. (2007). Eğitim Örgütlerinde Stratejik Liderlik ve Okul Müdürlerinin Stratejik Liderlik Uygulamaları. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Aqueveque, C. (2005). Signaling corporate values: Consumers’ suspicious minds. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(3), 70–81.
  2. Argüden, Y. (2003). İtibar yönetimi. (Derleyen: Yılmaz Argüden), İtibar Yönetimi, ArGe Danışmanlık Yayınları, (4), 18. Arikan, E., Kantur, D., Maden, C. ve Telci, E. E. (2016). Investigating the mediating role of corporate reputation on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and multiple stakeholder outcomes. Quality & Quantity, 50(1), 129–149.
  3. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
  4. Brammer, S. & Millington, A. (2005). Corporate reputation and philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 29–44.
  5. Bronn, P. S. & Vrioni, A. B. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: An overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207–222.
  6. Carlisle, Y. M. & Faulkner, D. O. (2005). The strategy of reputation. Strategic Change, 14(8), 413–422.
  7. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
  8. Carroll, A. B. & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.
  9. Chauvin, K. W. & Guthrie, J. P. (1994). Labor market reputation and the value of the firm. Managerial and Decision Economics, 15(6), 543–552.
  10. Choi, S. B., Ullah, S. M. & Kwak, W. J. (2015). Ethical leadership and followers’ attitudes toward corporate social responsibility: The role of perceived ethical work climate. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 43(3), 353–365.
  11. Cravens, K., Oliver, E. G. & Ramamoorti, S. (2003). The reputation index: Measuring and managing corporate reputation. European Management Journal, 21(2), 201–212.
  12. Davies, G. & Chun, R. (2009). The leader’s role in managing reputation. in Reputation Capital. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 311-323.
  13. Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of soci