Journals / OLBA / 2015 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 23

Artabazus's Role in the Dascylium Dynastic Systems

DASKYLEION DYNASTES'LİK SİSTEMİNDE ARTABAZOS'UN ROLÜ

Journal
OLBA
Pages
175–197
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study ends with a general evaluation compiling the data employed

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Artabazus's Role in the Dascylium Dynastic SystemsThis paper deals with the dynastic systems in Dascylium and the reason for this system being given to the dynasty of Pharnakes according to the satrap assignment criteria.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There are three types of satrap assignments which comprised the seven members of the Persians, royal family and dynasties, in the Persian Empire.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study ends with a general evaluation compiling the data employed
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Artabazus's Role in the Dascylium Dynastic SystemsThis paper deals with the dynastic systems in Dascylium and the reason for this system being given to the dynasty of Pharnakes according to the satrap assignment criteria. There are three types of satrap assignments which comprised the seven members of the Persians, royal family and dynasties, in the Persian Empire. General information concerning these three groups is given. This study compares Dynastic systems of the Persians and royal family. Such a continuous occupation of an office by a family was not only an expression of trust and honor on the part of the Great King, but also recognition of a resistant loyalty of the satraps towards the Great King and their successful management in the kingdoms interest. Consequently, this work has focused on Artabazus's military and diplomatic achievements/activi­ties, because he made the satrapy of Dascylium into a monopoly of the Pharnaces family. The study ends with a general evaluation compiling the data employed

Özet

Bu makalede, satrap atama kriterlerinin ortaya konması suretiyle Daskyleion satraplığındaki dynastes'lik sistemi ve dynastes'liğin Pharnakes oğlu Artabazos'un hanedanlığına inhisar edilmesinin nedenleri konu edilmektedir. Akhaimenid impa­ratorluğunda esas olarak yedi Pers soyu; kral ailesi ve dynastes'ler olmak üzere üç tür satrap görevlendiril mesi vardır. İlkin bu üç gruba ilişkin genel bilgi verilip Daskyleion'un dahil olduğu dynastes'lik sisteminin yedi Pers soyu ve kral ailesi görevlendirilmesiyle benzerlik ve farklılık arz eden noktalarına değinilmekte, bun­ların nedenleri üzerinde durulmaktadır. Dynastes'lik atamasının Büyük Kralın tak­dir ve onurlandırmasının karşılığı olarak bir hanedanlığa verildiği anlaşılmaktadır. Bu bağlamda Daskyleion satraplığının Pharnakes ailesinin tekeline intikal etmesini sağlayan Artabazos'un askeri ve diplomatik başarıları üzerinde yoğunlaşılmıştır. Çalışma kullanılan verilerin derlendiği genel bir değerlendirmeyle sonlan dırılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

SARIKAYA, S. (2022). Artabazus's Role in the Dascylium Dynastic Systems. OLBA, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 23, 175–197. https://ajindex.com/articles/653529

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Ael. Var. Claudius Aelianus, Varia Historia: Historical Miscellany, translation by N. G. Wilson. Cambridge, Mass.-London 1997.
  2. Aiskh. Pers. Aiskhylos, Persai: Aeschylus, translation by H. W. Smyth. Cambridge, Mass.-London, 1926.
  3. Aristot. pol. Aristoteles, Politica: Politics, translation by H. Rackham, vol. XXI. Cambridge, Mass.-London 2005.
  4. Arr. anab. Arrianus, Anabasis: Arrian, translation by P. A. Brunt, I-II. Cambridge, Mass.-London 1976-1983. AMI Archaologische Mitteilungen aus Iran, Berlin. App. Mithr. Appianus, Mithridateios: Appian’s Roman History, translation by H. White, vol. I-IV. Cambridge, Mass.-London 1912-1913. Arslan 2007
  5. Arslan, M., Mithradates VI. Eupator, Dionysos: Roma’nın En Büyük Düşmanı, İstanbul. Arslan 2009
  6. Arslan, M., “Pausanias’ın Byzantion Hakimiyeti ve Komplo Teorisi”, Şurada: Ancient History, Numismatics and Epigraphy in the Mediterranean World. Studies in memory of Clemens E. Bosch and Sabahat Atlan and in the honour of Nezahat Baydur, Ed. O. Tekin. İstanbul, 2009, 51-63. Arslan 2010
  7. Arslan, M., İstanbul’un Antikçağ Tarihi: Klasik ve Hellenistik Dönemler, İstanbul. Asher – Lloyd – Corcella 2007
  8. Asher, A. – A. Lloyd – A. Corcella, A Commentary on Herodotus Books I-IV, Oxford. Ath. Deip. Athenaios, Deipnosophisticarum Epitome: The Deipnosophistis, translation by C. B. Gulick, vol. I-VII. Cambridge, Mass.-London 1927-1999. Badian 1987
  9. Badian, E., “The Peace of Callias”, JHS CVII, 1987, 1-39. Balcer 1993
  10. Balcer, J. M., “The Ancient Persian satrapies and satraps in Western Anatolia”, AMI 26, 81-90. Balcer 1995
  11. Balcer, J. M., The Persian Conquest of the Greeks 545-450 B.C. Konstanz. BCH Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique, Paris, Athènes. Briant 2002
  12. P. Briant, Histore de I’Empire perse, Paris 1996: Çeviri: From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire, translated by P. T. Daniels, Winona Lake, Indiana Eisenbrauns. Bosworth 1990
  13. Bosworth, A. B., “Plutarch, Callisthenes and the Peace of Callias”, JHS 110, 1-13.
  14. CAH The Cambridge Ancient History, Ed. J. B. Bury – S. A. Cook. I-XII, Cambridge, London, 1923-1996. Cawkwell 1997
  15. Cawkwell, G. L., “The Peace between Athens and Persia”, Phoenix 51, 115-130. Chaumont 1990
  16. Chaumont, M. L., “Un nouveau gouverneur de Sardes à l’époque achéménide d’apès une inscription récemment découverte”, Syria 57/3, 579-608. Chiron Chiron. Mitteilungen der Kommission für Alte Geschichte und Epigraphice des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, München, Beck. Corn. Nep. Cornelius Nepos: Arist. (= A