Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

DOĞU ASYA VE PASİFİK ÜLKELERİNDE İŞSİZLİK HİSTERİSİ: PANEL VERİ YAKLAŞIMI

Pages
105–122
Publication Date
2015-03-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, it can be said that, the cyclical fluctuations don’t have permanent effect on the unemployment level in these countries

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Unemployment is one of the main problems of all countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the unemployment hysteresis hypothesis, unemployment rate follows a nonreverting path to its equilibrium in the long-run.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, it can be said that, the cyclical fluctuations don’t have permanent effect on the unemployment level in these countries
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İşsizlik histerisi · doğal işsizlik oranı hipotezi · panel birim

Abstract

Unemployment is one of the main problems of all countries. Thus, the interests and efforts of economists to explain the unemployment is becomes important. In this context, one of the hypothesis put forthed about unemployment is the hysteresis hypothesis. According to the unemployment hysteresis hypothesis, unemployment rate follows a nonreverting path to its equilibrium in the long-run. The aim of this paper is to investigate the validity of hysteresis hypothesis in unemployment rates in the developed East Asian and Pacific countries during the period 1985–2011. To this end we employed the panel unit root test introduced by Carrion-i-Silvestre and Carrion-i-Silvestre et. al. in 2005. The findings show that, the hysteresis does not characterise the unemployment in most of the countries contrary to the first generation panel unit root tests. Thus, it can be said that, the cyclical fluctuations don’t have permanent effect on the unemployment level in these countries

Özet

işsizliği açıklamaya ilişkin ilgi ve çabaları önem kazanmaktadır. Bu çerçevede işsizlikle ilgili ortaya atılan hipotezlerden birisi histeri hipotezidir. İşsizlik histerisi hipotezine göre işsizlik oranı, uzun dönemde dengeden uzaklaşan bir seyir izlemektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı da, işsizlik histerisi hipotezinin geçerliliğini gelişmiş Doğu Asya ve Pasifik ülkeleri için 1985-2011 döneminde sorgulamaktır. Bu amaçla, Carrion-i-Silvestre ile Carrion-i-Silvestre ve diğerleri tarafından 2005 yılında geliştirilen panel birim kök testi kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, birinci kuşak panel birim kök testlerinin aksine, gelişmiş Doğu Asya ve Pasifik ülkelerinin çoğunluğunda işsizlik histerisinin olmadığını göstermektedir. Bu sebeple konjoktürel dalgalanmaların bu

🔖

Cite This Article

Arı, A., Zeren, F., Özcan, B. (2015). DOĞU ASYA VE PASİFİK ÜLKELERİNDE İŞSİZLİK HİSTERİSİ: PANEL VERİ YAKLAŞIMI. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 105–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/6534

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ARESTIS, P., MARISCAL, I.B.F., OECD Unemployment: Structural Breaks and Sta- tionarity, Applied Economics, 32(4), 2000, s.399–403.
  2. BLANCHARD, O., SUMMERS, L., “Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem”., NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Der: S. Fischer, Cambridge: MIT Pres, 1986, s.15-78.
  3. BLANCHARD, O., SUMMERS, L., Hysteriesis in Unemployment, European Eco- nomic Review,31,1987, s.288-95. BREUER,B., MCNOWN,R., WALLACE,M.S., Misleading Inference from Panel Unit Root Tests with an Illustration from Purchasing Power Parity, Review of Inter- national Economics, 9(3), 2001, s.482-493. BREUER,B., MCNOWN,R., WALLACE,M.S., Series Specific Unit Root Test with Panel Data, Oxford Bulletion of Economics and Statistics, 64(5), 2002, s. 527-546.
  4. BREUSCH, T., PAGAN, A., The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Application to Mo- del Specifications in Econometrics, Reviews of Economics Studies, 47,1980, s.239–253. CAMARERO,M., CARRION-I-SILVERSTRE, J.L, TAMARIT,C., Testing for Hys- teresis in Unemployment in OECD Countries: New Evidence Using Stationary Panel Tests with Breaks, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 68(2), 2006, s. 167-182.
  5. CARRION-I-SILVERSTRE, J.L. Health Care Expenditure and GDP: Are they Bro- ken Stationary?, Journal of Health Economics, 24(5), 2005, s.839–854.
  6. CARRION-I-SILVERSTRE, J.L., DEL BARRIO-CASTRO, T., LOPEZ-BAZO, E., Breaking the Panels: An Application to the GDP Per Capita, Econometrics Journal, 8(2), 2005, s.159–175.
  7. CHANG, T., LEE, K.C., NIEH,C.C., WEI, C.C., An Empirical Note on Testing Hys- teresis in Unemployment for Ten European Countries: Panel SURADF Appro- ach, Applied Economics Letters, 12(14), 2005, s. 881-886.
  8. CHOI, I., Unit Roots Tests for Panel Data, Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 2001, s. 229–272.
  9. CHOU, H. C., ZHANG, Y.C., Unemployment hysteresis in G20 countries: Evidence from non-linear panel unit-root tests, African Journal of Business Manage- ment, 6(49),2012, s. 11887–11890.
  10. CHRISTOPOULOS, K. D., LEO´N-LEDESMA, M.A.,Unemployment hysteresis in EU countries: what do we really know about it?, Journal of Economic Stu- dies, 34(2), 2007, s.80–89.
  11. CUESTAS, J.C., GIL-ALANA, L.A., Unemployment Hysteresis, Structural Chan- ges, Non Linearities and Fractional Integration in European Transition Eco- nomies, Working Papers 2011005, 2011. http://www.shef.ac.uk/polopoly_ fs/1.105369 /file/2011005, Erişim Tarihi (30.06.2013).
  12. FRIEDMAN, M.,The Role of Monetary Policy, American Economic Review, 58,1968, s. 1–17.