SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

HUKUK, SİYASET VE UZUN DÖNEMLİ İKTİSADİ GELİŞME

K. Kıvanç KARAMAN
Pages
29–48
Publication Date
2015-03-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article also summarizes the debates in the literature regarding the roles of law and politics in the development process

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article reviews the works in the New Institutional Economics Literature that investigate the impact of law and politics on long term economic development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The importance of this literature lies in its innovative use of mathematical modeling and empirical analysis to investigate social mechanisms that until recently mainstream economics had stayed away from.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article also summarizes the debates in the literature regarding the roles of law and politics in the development process
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:iktisadi gelişme · siyasal iktisat · Kurumsal iktisat

Abstract

This article reviews the works in the New Institutional Economics Literature that investigate the impact of law and politics on long term economic development. The importance of this literature lies in its innovative use of mathematical modeling and empirical analysis to investigate social mechanisms that until recently mainstream economics had stayed away from. The review of the literature highlights the promise of this approach to provide a unified, comprehensive and flexible theoretical framework to study development and more generally the interactions between different social processes. The article also summarizes the debates in the literature regarding the roles of law and politics in the development process

Özet

Bu makale, Yeni Kurumsal İktisat literatürü kapsamında hukuk ve siyasetin uzun dönemli gelişmeye etkisini inceleyen çalışmaları ele alacaktır. Bu literatürün önemi, iktisatta yaygın olarak kullanılan matematiksel modelleme ve ampirik sınama yöntemlerini, iktisat biliminin uzun bir süre mesafeli durduğu gelişmenin temelinde yatan toplumsal kurumları anlama amacı için kullanmasıdır. Ele alınan çalışmalar, bu metodolojik yaklaşımın, gerek özel olarak gelişme konusunda, gerekse daha genel olarak sosyal süreçler arasındaki etkileşimleri modelleme açısından, ortak, kapsayıcı ve esnek bir teorik çerçeve oluşturma potansiyeli taşıdığını gösterir. Makale ayrıca hukuk ve siyasetin iktisadi gelişmeyi belirlemedeki nispi önemleri ve gelişmeye etkilerini hangi mekanizmalar üzerinden gösterdiklerine dair literatürde devam eden tartışmaları değerlendirecektir

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAMAN, K. K. (2015). HUKUK, SİYASET VE UZUN DÖNEMLİ İKTİSADİ GELİŞME. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 29–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/6531

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. ACEMOGLU, D., JOHNSON, S. ve ROBINSON, J. A., “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation”, American Economic Review, 91(5), 2001, s. 1369–1401.
  2. ACEMOGLU, D., JOHNSON, S., ve ROBINSON, J. A., “Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 2002,s. 1231–1294.
  3. ACEMOGLU, D. ve ROBINSON, J., Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty (1st ed.), Crown Business, 2012.
  4. ACEMOGLU, D. ve ROBINSON, J. A., “Economic Backwardness in Political Perspective”, American Political Science Review, 100(1), 2006, s. 115–131.
  5. BECK, T., “Legal Institutions and Economic Development” (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1669100), Rochester, NY, Social Science Research Network. http:// papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1669100, 2010.
  6. BERNSTEIN, L., “Opting Out of the Legal System: Extralegal Contractual Relations in the Diamond Industry”, The Journal of Legal Studies, 21(1), 1992, s. 115–57.
  7. BLUHM, Richard ve Adam SZIRMAI, Institutions and Long-run Growth Performance: An Analytic Literature Review of the Institutional Determinants of Economic Growth, United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology, 2012,
  8. RePEc - IDEAS. BOCKSTETTE, V., CHANDA, A. ve PUTTERMAN, L., “States and Markets: The Advantage of an Early Start”, Journal of Economic Growth, 7(4), 2002, s. 347–369.
  9. CASS, David, “Optimum Growth in an Aggregative Model of Capital Accumulation”, The Review of Economic Studies, 32(3), 1965, s. 233–240.
  10. CLAY, Karen, “Trade, Institutions, and Credit”, Explorations in Economic History, 34(4),1997, s. 495-521.
  11. COASE, Ronald H.,“The Nature of the Firm”. Economica, 4(16), 1937, s. 386–405.
  12. COASE, Ronald H., “Problem of Social Cost”, The. Journal of Law and Economics, 3 (1), 1960, s. 1-44.
  13. DIAMOND, J. M., Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies, W. W. Norton & Company Incorporated, 1997.
  14. DIAMOND, L., “The State and Violence”, Perspectives on Politics, 8(01), 2010, s. 293–296.
  15. DIXIT, A., “Trade Expansion and Contract Enforcement”, Journal of Political Economy, 111(6), 2003, s. 1293–1317.
  16. EASTERLY, W. R., The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists’ Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics, MIT Press, 2002.
  17. EASTERLY, William, ve Ross LEVINE, “Tropics, Germs, and Crops: How Endowments Influence Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 2003, s. 3-39. FAFCHAMPS,