Journals / Journal of FisheriesSciences.com / 2008 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4

Otolith Structure, Otolith Dimensions-Fish Length Relationships and Age Determination of Fourspotted Megrim Lepidorhombus boscii (Risso, 1810)

BENEKLİ PİSİ, Lepidorhombus boscii (RISSO, 1810)’NİN OTOLİT YAPISI, OTOLİT BOYUTLARI- BALIK BOYU İLİŞKİLERİ VE YAŞ TAYİNİ

Pages
375–381
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean values of the blind and ocular side otoliths were 4.599 ±0.069 mm ve 4.768 ±0.067 mm (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The core is centric in the fourspotted megrim’s blind side otoliths where it is near the posterior area in the ocular side otoliths.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Consequently, while the opaque and hiyalin rings were observed both anterior and posterior area on the blind side otoliths, rings were overlapped on the ocular side otoliths, because of having a core nearly posterior area and this made it difficult to follow the continuity of zones.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean values of the blind and ocular side otoliths were 4.599 ±0.069 mm ve 4.768 ±0.067 mm (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The core is centric in the fourspotted megrim’s blind side otoliths where it is near the posterior area in the ocular side otoliths. Consequently, while the opaque and hiyalin rings were observed both anterior and posterior area on the blind side otoliths, rings were overlapped on the ocular side otoliths, because of having a core nearly posterior area and this made it difficult to follow the continuity of zones. The mean values of the blind and ocular side otoliths were 4.599 ±0.069 mm ve 4.768 ±0.067 mm (P

Özet

Benekli pisinin kör bölge otolitinde merkez tam ortada bulunurken, gözlü bölge otolitinde ise otolitin posterior kısmına daha yakındır. Bundan dolayı, opak ve hiyalin halkalar kör bölge otolitinde hem anterior hem posterior kısımda gözlenebilirken, gözlü bölge otolitinde merkez posterior tarafa daha yakın olduğu için halkalar bu kısımda çakışmakta ve halka devamlılığının takibi güçleşmektedir. Kör ve gözlü bölge ortalama otolit boyları 4.599 ±0.069 mm ve 4.768 ±0.067 mm (P

🔖

Cite This Article

BOSTANCI, D., POLAT, N. (2022). Otolith Structure, Otolith Dimensions-Fish Length Relationships and Age Determination of Fourspotted Megrim Lepidorhombus boscii (Risso, 1810). Journal of FisheriesSciences.com, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4, 375–381. https://ajindex.com/articles/652414

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Araya, M., Cubillos, L. A., Guzmán, M., Peñailillo, J., Sepúlveda, A., (2001). Evidence of a relationship between age and otolith weight in the chilean jack mackerel, Trachurus symmetricus murphyi (Nichols), Fisheries Research, 51: 17-26.
  2. Bostancı, D., (2005). Bafra Balık Gölü ve Eğirdir Gölü’nde Yaşayan Balık Populasyonlarında Opak Birikim Analizi İle Yaş Doğrulaması. Doktora Tezi, OMU Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 136s. Bostancı, D., Polat, N., (2007).
  3. Dil balığı, Solea lascaris (Risso, 1810)’te Otolit Yapısı, Otolit Boyutları-Balık Boyu İlişkileri ve Yaş Tayini, Fırat Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(3): 265-272.
  4. Cardinale, M., Arrhenius, F., Johnson, B., (2000). Potential use of otolith weight for the determination of age-structure of Baltic cod (Gadus morhua) and plaice (Pleuronectes platessa), Fisheries Research, 45: 239-252.
  5. Casas, J. M., Pineiro, C., (2000). Growth and age estimation of greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides Brünnich, 1768) in the north and northwest of the Iberian Peninsula (ICES Division VIIIc and IXa), Fisheries Research, 47: 19-25.
  6. Dwyer K. S., Walsh, S. J., Campana, S. E. (2003). Age determination, validation and growth of Grand Bank yellowtail flounder (Limanda ferruginea), ICES Journal of Marine Science, 60: 1123- 1138. Kurt, A., (2005). Karadeniz’de yaşayan Benekli Kaya Balığı, Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) (Gobiidae)’ta yaş tayini yöntemlerinin ve büyüme parametrelerinin belirlenmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, OMU Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 84s. Labropoulou, M., Papaconstantinou, C., 2000. Comparison of otolith growth and somatic growth in two macrourid fishes. Fisheries Research, 46: 177- 188. Landa, J., Pineiro C., (2000). Megrim (Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis) growth in the North-eastern Atlantic based on back-calculation of otolith ring, ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57: 1077- 1090. Newman, S. J., Cappo, M., Williams, D. McB., (2000). Age, growth, mortality rates and corresponding yield estimates using otoliths of the tropical red snappers, Lutjanus erythropterus, L. malabaricus and L. sebae, from the central Great Barrier Reef. Fisheries Research, 48: 1-14.
  7. Norbis, W., Lorenzo, M. I., Torres, G. J., (1999). Intra-annual growth variations of young-of-the-year hake (Merluccius hubbsi) of the Uruguayan continental shelf based on otolith analysis, Fisheries Research, 44: 129-137.
  8. Pilling, G. M., Grandcourt, E. M., Kirkwood, G. P., (2003). The utility of otolith weight as a predictor of age in the emperor Leth