SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of FisheriesSciences.com / 2012 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Umman Denizinden toplanan carangit balığının (Carangoides coeruleopunctatus (Rüppell, 1830)) boyu ile otolit boyutları arasındaki ilişki

Relationship between fish length and otolith dimensions in the carangid fish (Carangoides coeruleopinnatus (Rüppell, 1830)) collected from the Sea of Oman

Laith A. JAWAD
Juma AL MAMRY
Pages
203–208
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Similarly, no significant difference was observed between regressions of fish length on width and length of otolith length, so a single linear regression was plotted against total length (TL) for otolith length (OL) and otolith width (OW).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The regressions between otolith size (length and width) and fish length of the carangid fish, Carangoides coeruleopinnatus living along the coasts of the Sea of Oman were provided.
📊
Key Findings & Data:ANCOVA test showed no differences in length and width of the right and left otolith of fish specimens obtained.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Similarly, no significant difference was observed between regressions of fish length on width and length of otolith length, so a single linear regression was plotted against total length (TL) for otolith length (OL) and otolith width (OW).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The regressions between otolith size (length and width) and fish length of the carangid fish, Carangoides coeruleopinnatus living along the coasts of the Sea of Oman were provided. ANCOVA test showed no differences in length and width of the right and left otolith of fish specimens obtained. Similarly, no significant difference was observed between regressions of fish length on width and length of otolith length, so a single linear regression was plotted against total length (TL) for otolith length (OL) and otolith width (OW).

Özet

Umman Denizi kıyılarında yaşayan Carangid türü bir balık olan Carangoides coeruleopinnatus’in otolit boyutları (uzunluk ve genişlik) ve balık boyu arasındaki regresyonlar incelenmiştir. ANCOVA testi ile elde edilen balık örneklerinin sağ ve sol otolitinde uzunluk ve genişlik açısından herhangi bir farklılık göstermemiştir. Benzer şekilde, balık uzunluğu ve otolit uzunluğu arasındaki regresyonda da belirgin bir fark gözlenmemiştir. Bu nedenle otolit uzunluğu ve otolit genişliği için toplam uzunluğa karşı tek bir lineer regresyon alınmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

JAWAD, L. A., MAMRY, J. A. (2022). Umman Denizinden toplanan carangit balığının (Carangoides coeruleopunctatus (Rüppell, 1830)) boyu ile otolit boyutları arasındaki ilişki. Journal of FisheriesSciences.com, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 203–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/652409

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ainley, D. G., Anderson, D.W., Kelly, P. R., (1981). Feeding ecology of marine cormorants in southwestern North America, Condor, 83: 120-131. doi: 10.2307/1367418 Aydin, R., Calta, M., Sen, D., Coban, M. Z., (2004). Relationships between fish lengths and otolith length in the population of Chondrostoma regium (Heckel, 1843) inhabiting Keban Dam Lake, Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 7: 1550-1553. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2004.1550.1553 Battaglia, P., Malara, D., Romeo, T., Aadaloro, F., (2010). Relationship between otolith size and fish size in some mesopelagic and bathypelagic species from the Mediterranean Sea (Strait of Messina), Scientia Marina, 74: 605-612. doi: 10.3989/scimar.2010.74n3605 Boehlert, G. W., (1985). Using objective criteria and multiple regression models for age determination in fishes, Fishery Bulletin, 83: 103-117.
  2. Campana, S. E., Casselman, J. M., (1993). Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 50: 1062-1083. doi: 10.1139/f93-123 Campana, S. E., (2004). Photographic atlas of fish otoliths of the Northwest Atlantic Ocean, pp. 284.Ottawa, Ontario: NRC Research Press.
  3. Eecheverria, T. W., (1987). Relationship of otolith length to total length in rockfishes from northern and central California, Fishery Bulletin, 85: 383-387.
  4. Fitch, J. E., (1964). The fish fauna of the Playa del Rey Locality, a southern California marine Pleistocene deposit, Los Angeles City Museum of Contemporary Science, 82: 3-35.
  5. Fitch, J. E., (1969). Fossil records of certain schooling fishes of the California current system, CALCOFI Report, 13: 71-80.
  6. Fowler, J., Cohen, L., (1992). Practical statistics for field biology. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto, 227pp. Gamboa, D. A., (1991). Otolith size versus weight and body-length relationships for eleven fish species of Baja California, Mexico, Fishery Bulletin, 89: 701-706.
  7. Granadeiro, J. P., Silva, M. A., (2000). The use of otoliths and vertebrae in the identification and size-estimation of fish in predator-prey studies, Cybium, 24: 383-393.
  8. Harvey, J. T., Loughlin, T. R., Perez, M. A., Oxman, D. S., (2000). Relationship between fish size and otolith length for 63 species of fishes from the eastern North Pacific Ocean. NOAA Technical Report NMFS, 150: pp. 35. Jobling, M., Breiby, A., (1986). The use and abuse of fish otoliths in studies of feeding habits of marine piscivores, Sarsia, 71: 265- 274. Katayama, S., Isshiki, T., (2007