Journals / Journal of education and research in nursing (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

Obstacles and Related Factors Faced by Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes in Managing Diabetes

Pages
389–395
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that women faced more disabilities than men (P < .05) at diagnosis sub-scale; 60 years old and over faced more obstacles at knowledge and beliefs and lifestyle changes sub-scales; the single group faced more obstacles than the married group (P < .05) at medication sub-scale; the group that did not comply with the diet and exercise was the group that encountered the obstacles most in all subscales except for diagnosis sub-scale (P < .05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The purpose of this research is to identify the obstacles that patients diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes face in diabetes management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The population of the study consisted of 244 patients who applied to internal medicine clinics of the Public Hospital in Nevşehir between December 2018 and September 2019 with diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that women faced more disabilities than men (P < .05) at diagnosis sub-scale; 60 years old and over faced more obstacles at knowledge and beliefs and lifestyle changes sub-scales; the single group faced more obstacles than the married group (P < .05) at medication sub-scale; the group that did not comply with the diet and exercise was the group that encountered the obstacles most in all subscales except for diagnosis sub-scale (P < .05).
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this research is to identify the obstacles that patients diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes face in diabetes management. Methods: The population of the study consisted of 244 patients who applied to internal medicine clinics of the Public Hospital in Nevşehir between December 2018 and September 2019 with diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes. The Patient Identification Form and the Diabetes Obstacles Questionnaire (DOQ) were used to collect the data. In data analysis, percent, mean, and standard deviation were used for descriptive analyses, and Independent samples t-test and One-way ANOVA test were used for comparisons. Results: The DOQ sub-scale scores of the individuals included in the study were found as 16.75 ± 49.18 for self-monitoring, 25.92 ± 37.31 for diagnosis, 13.40 ± 34.46 for lifestyle changes, and 33.96 ± 30.93 for coping. It was found that women faced more disabilities than men (P < .05) at diagnosis sub-scale; 60 years old and over faced more obstacles at knowledge and beliefs and lifestyle changes sub-scales; the single group faced more obstacles than the married group (P < .05) at medication sub-scale; the group that did not comply with the diet and exercise was the group that encountered the obstacles most in all subscales except for diagnosis sub-scale (P < .05). Conclusion: In this study, it was found that the patients encountered the most obstacles related to coping with diabetes, diagnosis, self-monitoring, and lifestyle changes. It has been identified that variables such as gender, age, marital status, exercise status, and adherence to diet affect the barriers patients face in diabetes management. It is recommended to support patients in diabetes management more and to plan nursing education considering the individual differences and conditions related to the areas they perceive as obstacles.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCE, G. E., MUZ, G., YILDIRIM, C., DAĞDELEN, M. (2022). Obstacles and Related Factors Faced by Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes in Managing Diabetes. Journal of education and research in nursing (Online), Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 389–395. https://ajindex.com/articles/652380

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2019
  2. 107843. [Crossref] 2. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 8th ed. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation
  3. Satman I, Omer B, Tutuncu Y, et al. Twelve-year trends in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and prediabetes in Turkish adults. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013
  4. 28(2):169-180. [Crossref] 4. Bakanlığı TS, Kurumu HS. Türkiye Diyabet Programı 2015-2020. Türkiye Halk Sagligi Kurumu Yayin. 2014
  5. 13(816):25-38. 5. Shrivastava RS, Shrivastava PS, Rmasamy J. Role of self-care in management of diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2013
  6. 12(14):14-18. [Crossref] 6. Kahraman G, Tavşanlı Güngör N, Baydur H, Özmen D, Özmen E. Tip 2 diyabet hastalarinda diyabette engeller ölçeğinin geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg. 2016
  7. 17(Supplement 1):33-44. [Crossref] 7. Velascoa PD, Chavesb ES, Poyoc JM, Oterod BD, Sancheze RG, Esterd PV. Quality of life and satisfaction with treatment in subjects with type 2 diabetes: Results in Spain of the PANORAMA study. Endocrinol Nutr. 2014
  8. 61(1):18-26. [Crossref] 8. American Diabetes Association. Tight diabetes control, 2018. Retrieved from http://archives.diabetes.org/living-with-diabetes/treatment-andcare/ blood-glucose-control/tight-diabetes-control.html. 9. McBrien KA, Naugler C, Ivers N, et al. Barriers to care in patients with diabetes and poor glycemic control—A cross-sectional survey. PLoS One. 2017
  9. 12(5):1-14. [Crossref] 10. Çelik S, Pınar R. Diyabetli bireylerde insülin enjeksiyon ve parmak delme korkusu. J Psychiatr Nurs. 2014
  10. 5(2):104-108. [Crossref] 11. Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Gillette CD. Psycho-social barriers to diabetes self-management and quality of life. Diabetes Spectrum. 2001
  11. 14(1):33-41. [Crossref] 12. Song MS, Kim HS. Intensive management program to improve glycosylated hemoglobin level and adherence to diet in patients with type 2 diabetes. Appl Nurs Res 2009
  12. 22(1):42-47. [Crossref] 13. Boussageon R, Gueyffıer F, Cornu C. Effects of pharmacological treatments on micro and macrovascular complications of type 2 diabetes: What is the level of evidence? Diabetes Metab. 2014
  13. 40(3):169-175. [Crossref] 14. Jones L, Crabb S, Turnbull D, Oxlad M. Barriers and facilitators to effective type 2 diabetes ma