Journals / Joint diseases and related surgery / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

External and internal hemipelvectomy: A retrospective analysis of 68 cases

Pages
132–141
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The patients treated with internal hemipelvectomy had a mean survival of 97.0 months compared to 25.7 months in patients treated with external hemipelvectomy (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to investigate the factors that may be associated with surgical site infection and mortality in pelvic resection surgeries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and methods: A t otal o f 6 8 p atients ( 40 m ales, 28 females; mean age: 43±16.2 years; range, 11 to 70 years) who underwent internal or external hemipelvectomy between January 2010 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The patients treated with internal hemipelvectomy had a mean survival of 97.0 months compared to 25.7 months in patients treated with external hemipelvectomy (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the factors that may be associated with surgical site infection and mortality in pelvic resection surgeries. Patients and methods: A t otal o f 6 8 p atients ( 40 m ales, 28 females; mean age: 43±16.2 years; range, 11 to 70 years) who underwent internal or external hemipelvectomy between January 2010 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. We reviewed data concerning histopathological diagnosis, surgical technique, pelvic resection type, tumor size, postoperative infection, duration of follow-up, and mortality. Results: The mean follow-up was 45.5±42.2 months. Among 68 patients, 29 (42.6%) cases underwent external hemipelvectomy and 39 (57.4%) cases underwent internal hemipelvectomy. Reconstruction was performed in 14 (20.6%) patients who underwent internal hemipelvectomy. Of all patients, 61 had primary malignant pelvic tumors and two had metastatic pelvic tumors. Of the other five patients, two had a giant cell tumor, two had a pelvic hydatid cyst, and one had an aneurysmal bone cyst. The three most common pelvic tumors were chondrosarcoma (n=25, 36.7%), osteosarcoma (n=13, 19.1%), and Ewing sarcoma (n=8, 11.8%). Surgical site infections were observed in 34 (50.0%) patients. Of 34 patients, 15 (22.1%) had superficial infections and 19 (27.9%) had deep surgical infections. The superficial and deep infection rates were higher in the external hemipelvectomy group compared to internal hemipelvectomy (p=0.02). Patients with postoperative infection had a mean survival period of 36.0 months compared to 79.8 months in patients without infection (p=0.037). The patients treated with internal hemipelvectomy had a mean survival of 97.0 months compared to 25.7 months in patients treated with external hemipelvectomy (p

🔖

Cite This Article

MERTER, A., SAĞLIK, Y., BAŞARIR, K., KARACA, M. O., ÖZBEK, E. A., ÖZYILDIRAN, M., YILDIZ, H. Y. (2022). External and internal hemipelvectomy: A retrospective analysis of 68 cases. Joint diseases and related surgery, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 132–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/652223

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Mayerson JL, Wooldridge AN, Scharschmidt TJ. Pelvic resection: Current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014;22:214-22
  2. Angelini A, Drago G, Trovarelli G, Calabrò T, Ruggieri P. Infection after surgical resection for pelvic bone tumors: An analysis of 270 patients from one institution. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:349-59
  3. Muñoz Muñoz P, Bajawi Carretero M, González Barranquero A, Mena Mateos A, Corral Moreno S, Sanjuanbenito Dehesa A, et al. Impact of unplanned resection and re-excision of a soft tissue sarcoma on prognosis. Cir Esp (Engl Ed) 2020;98:281-7
  4. Guder WK, Hardes J, Gosheger G, Henrichs MP, Nottrott M, Streitbürger A. Analysis of surgical and oncological outcome in internal and external hemipelvectomy in 34 patients above the age of 65 years at a mean follow-up of 56 months. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015;16:33
  5. Freitas RR, Crivellaro AL, Mello GJ, Neto MA, Filho Gde F, Silva LV. Hemipelvectomy: Erasto Gaertner Hospital's experiences with 32 cases in 10 years. Rev Bras Ortop 2015;45:413-9
  6. Pring ME, Weber KL, Unni KK, Sim FH. Chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. A review of sixty-four cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001;83:1630-42
  7. Uzunköy A. Cerrahi alan enfeksiyonları: Risk faktörleri önleme yöntemleri. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2005;11:269-81
  8. Hugate R Jr, Sim FH. Pelvic reconstruction techniques. Orthop Clin North Am 2006;37:85-97
  9. Aljassir F, Beadel GP, Turcotte RE, Griffin AM, Bell RS, Wunder JS, et al. Outcome after pelvic sarcoma resection reconstructed with saddle prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;438:36-41
  10. Baliski CR, Schachar NS, McKinnon JG, Stuart GC, Temple WJ. Hemipelvectomy: A changing perspective for a rare procedure. Can J Surg 2004;47:99-103
  11. Enneking WF, Dunham WK. Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1978;60:731-46
  12. Senchenkov A, Moran SL, Petty PM, Knoetgen J 3rd, Clay RP, Bite U, et al. Predictors of complications and outcomes of external hemipelvectomy wounds: Account of 160 consecutive cases. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:355-63
  13. Couto AG, Araújo B, Torres de Vasconcelos RA, Renni MJ, Da Fonseca CO, Cavalcanti IL. Survival rate and perioperative data of patients who have undergone hemipelvectomy: A retrospective case series. World J Surg Oncol 2016;14:255
  14. Benatto MT, Hussein AM, Gava NF, Maranho DA, Engel EE. Complications and cost analysis of hemipelvectomy for the treatment of pelvic tumors. Acta Ortop Bras 20