SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Vitelline duct pathologies in neonates

Cemile BAŞDAŞ
Seyithan ÖZAYDIN
Serdar SANDER
Elmas Reyhan ALİM
Esra POLAT
Süleyman ÇELEBİ
Pages
211–215
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ectopic gastric tissue was more prevalent in the surgical VDP cases than in the incidentallydiscovered and VDP removal cases (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review the management of pediatric cases of vitelline duct pathology (VDP) detected surgically or incidentally during the neonatal period and the outcomes.METHODS: The data of newborns who were symptomatic and underwent VDP resection or who were incidentally diagnosedwith VDP at a single institution between 1985 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed in terms of age, sex, clinical features,treatment, perioperative findings, ectopic tissue pathology, and postoperative follow-up information.RESULTS: Among the 36 newborns enrolled in this study, 26 were male and 10 were female (2.6:1).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The median weightwas 2400 g (range: 800–3090 g).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ectopic gastric tissue was more prevalent in the surgical VDP cases than in the incidentallydiscovered and VDP removal cases (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review the management of pediatric cases of vitelline duct pathology (VDP) detected surgically or incidentally during the neonatal period and the outcomes.METHODS: The data of newborns who were symptomatic and underwent VDP resection or who were incidentally diagnosedwith VDP at a single institution between 1985 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed in terms of age, sex, clinical features,treatment, perioperative findings, ectopic tissue pathology, and postoperative follow-up information.RESULTS: Among the 36 newborns enrolled in this study, 26 were male and 10 were female (2.6:1). The median weightwas 2400 g (range: 800–3090 g). In 16 cases (14 males and 2 females; 7:1) the VDP was surgically repaired. Pathologicalevaluation indicated that 43% (n=7) of the cases had ectopic gastric mucosa. VDP was incidentally discovered in 12 malesand 8 females (1.5:1). VDP was removed in 10 cases (50%) and left intact in others. Ectopic gastric mucosa was observed in10% of the VDP removal cases. Ectopic gastric tissue was more prevalent in the surgical VDP cases than in the incidentallydiscovered and VDP removal cases (p

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞDAŞ, C., ÖZAYDIN, S., SANDER, S., ALİM, E. R., POLAT, E., ÇELEBİ, S. (2022). Vitelline duct pathologies in neonates. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 211–215. https://ajindex.com/articles/652035

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Yahchouchy EK, Marano AF, Etienne JC, Fingerhut AL. Meckel’s diverticulum. J Am Coll Surg 2001;192:658–62
  2. Sagar J, Kumar V, Shah DK. Meckel’s diverticulum: a systematic review. J R Soc Med 2006;99:501–5
  3. Park JJ, Wolff BG, Tollefson MK, Walsh EE, Larson DR. Meckel diverticulum: the Mayo Clinic experience with 1476 patients (1950-2002). Ann Surg 2005;241:529–33
  4. Kadian YS, Verma A, Rattan KN, Kajal P. Vitellointestinal Duct Anomalies in Infancy. J Neonatal Surg 2016;5:30
  5. Menezes M, Tareen F, Saeed A, Khan N, Puri P. Symptomatic Meckel’s diverticulum in children: a 16-year review. Pediatr Surg Int 2008;24:575–7
  6. Stone PA, Hofeldt MJ, Campbell JE, Vedula G, DeLuca JA, Flaherty SK. Meckel diverticulum: ten-year experience in adults. South Med J 2004;97:1038–41
  7. Tseng YY, Yang YJ. Clinical and diagnostic relevance of Meckel’s diverticulum in children. Eur J Pediatr 2009;168:1519–23
  8. St-Vil D, Brandt ML, Panic S, Bensoussan AL, Blanchard H. Meckel’s diverticulum in children: a 20-year review. J Pediatr Surg 1991;26:1289–92
  9. Cserni G. Gastric pathology in Meckel’s diverticulum. Review of cases resected between 1965 and 1995. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;106:782–5
  10. Gandy J, Byrne P, Lees G. Neonatal Meckel’s diverticular inflammation with perforation. J Pediatr Surg 1997;32:750–1
  11. Elsayes KM, Menias CO, Harvin HJ, Francis IR. Imaging manifestations of Meckel’s diverticulum. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:81–8
  12. Baker Al Jr, Marshall SF. Meckel’s diverticulum: a report of ninety-three cases. Am Surg 1955;21:1173–81
  13. Ko SF, Tiao MM, Huang FC, Hsieh CS, Huang CC, Ng SH, et al. Internal hernia associated with Meckel’s diverticulum in 2 pediatric patients. Am J Emerg Med 2008;26:86–90
  14. Ojha S, Menon P, Rao KL. Meckel’s diverticulum with segmental dilatation of the ileum: radiographic diagnosis in a neonate. Pediatr Radiol 2004;34:649–51
  15. Sy ED, Shan YS, Tsai HM, Lin CH. Meckel’s diverticulum associated with ileal volvulus in a neonate. Pediatr Surg Int 2002;18:529–31
  16. Chang YT, Lin JY, Huang YS. Spontaneous perforation of Meckel’s diverticulum without peritonitis in a newborn: report of a case. Surg Today 2006;36:1114–7
  17. Cullen JJ, Kelly KA, Moir CR, Hodge DO, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd. Surgical management of Meckel’s diverticulum. An epidemiologic, population-based study. Ann Surg 1994;220:564–8
  18. Matsagas MI, Fatouros M, Koulouras B, Giannoukas AD. Incidence, complications, and management of Meckel’s diverticu