Groups were compared in terms of intervention-related complication rates, a total proceduretime, and the requirement of control imaging with ionizing radiation.RESULTS: The mean total procedure time was significantly shorter (19.5±4.6 min, 46.7±19.6 min, p
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: One of the leading venous access methods in chemotherapy is the use of a venous port catheter (VPC).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In our study, the VPC placement via both of these techniqueswas compared.METHODS: A total of 180 consecutive patients who underwent the VPC placement procedure either via the open or ultrasound-guided methods in two centers between January 2014 and January 2016 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Groups were compared in terms of intervention-related complication rates, a total proceduretime, and the requirement of control imaging with ionizing radiation.RESULTS: The mean total procedure time was significantly shorter (19.5±4.6 min, 46.7±19.6 min, p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: One of the leading venous access methods in chemotherapy is the use of a venous port catheter (VPC). Anopen surgical or ultrasound-guided technique can be performed. In our study, the VPC placement via both of these techniqueswas compared.METHODS: A total of 180 consecutive patients who underwent the VPC placement procedure either via the open or ultrasound-guided methods in two centers between January 2014 and January 2016 were included in the study. Patients’ datawere reviewed retrospectively. Groups were compared in terms of intervention-related complication rates, a total proceduretime, and the requirement of control imaging with ionizing radiation.RESULTS: The mean total procedure time was significantly shorter (19.5±4.6 min, 46.7±19.6 min, p
🔖
Cite This Article
BALKANAY, O. O., DEMİRYAS, S. (2022). Comparison of intraoperative ultrasonography guidance with an open surgical method for venous port catheter placement in chemotherapy. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 279–283. https://ajindex.com/articles/652028
Miccini M, Cassini D, Gregori M, Gazzanelli S, Cassibba S, Biacchi D. Ultrasound-Guided Placement of Central Venous Port Systems via the Right InternalJugular Vein: Are Chest X-Ray and/or Fluoroscopy Needed to Confirm the CorrectPlacement of the Device? World J Surg 2016
2353–8. [CrossRef ] 2. Niederhuber JE, Ensminger W, Gyves JW, Liepman M, Doan K, Cozzi E. Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. Surgery 1982
706–12. 3. de Gregorio MA, Miguelena JM, Fernández JA, de Gregorio C, Tres A, Alfonso ER. Subcutaneous ports in the radiology suite: an effective and safe procedure for care in cancer patients. Eur Radiol 1996
748–52. 4. Seiler CM, Frohlich BE, Dorsam UJ, Kienle P, Buchler MW, Knaebel HP. Surgical technique for totally implantable access ports (TIAP) needs improvement: a multivariate analysis of 400 patients. J Surg Oncol 2006
24–9. [CrossRef ] 5. McGee WT, Ackerman BL, Rouben LR, Prasad VM, Bandi V, Mallory DL. Accurate placement of central venous catheters: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Crit Care Med 1993
1118–23. [CrossRef ] 6. Yilmazlar A, Bilgin H, Korfali G, Eren A, Ozkan U. Complications of 1303 central venous cannulations. J R Soc Med 1997
319–21. [CrossRef ] 7. Patel RY, Friedman A, Shams JN, Silberzweig JE. Central venous catheter tip malposition. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2010
338–42. [CrossRef ] 9. Lichtenstein D, Mezière G, Biderman P, Gepner A. The comet-tail artifact: an ultrasound sign ruling out pneumothorax. Intensive Care Med 1999
383–8. [CrossRef ] 10. Brown JR, Slomski C, Saxe AW. Is routine postoperative chest x-ray necessary after fluoroscopic-guided subclavian central venous port placement? J Am Coll Surg 2009
517–9. [CrossRef ] 11. Losert H, Prokesch R, Grabenwöger M, Waltl B, Apsner R, SunderPlassmann G, et al. Inadvertent transpericardial insertion of a central venous line with cardiac tamponade failure of preventive practices. Intensive Care Med 2000
1147–50. [CrossRef ] 12. Vezzani A, Brusasco C, Palermo S, Launo C, Mergoni M, Corradi F. Ultrasound localization of central vein catheter and detection of postprocedural pneumothorax: an alternative to chest radiography. Crit