Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Validation of a smartphone-based electrocardiography in the screening of QT intervals in children

Pages
48–52
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was high correlation between the QT intervals of 12-lead electrocardiographs and AliveCorrecordings (Pearson’s correlation coefficient: 0.83 [p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: A 12-lead electrocardiography is a critical component for the screening of long QT syndrome; however, besides, an electrocardiograph, trained personnel are also necessary which limits the screening capability of conventional electrocardiographs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of thispilot study was to assess the reliability of a smartphone-based electrocardiography device in the measurement of QT andcorrected QT intervals in children.METHODS: In all participants, 10-s smartphone electrocardiography tracing from AliveCor device and a standard 12-leadelectrocardiograph were obtained simultaneously.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was high correlation between the QT intervals of 12-lead electrocardiographs and AliveCorrecordings (Pearson’s correlation coefficient: 0.83 [p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A 12-lead electrocardiography is a critical component for the screening of long QT syndrome; however, besides, an electrocardiograph, trained personnel are also necessary which limits the screening capability of conventional electrocardiographs. The development of smartphone electrocardiography technologies provides a potential alternative platformfor electrocardiography screening for selective purposes such as arrhythmias and QT interval abnormalities. The aim of thispilot study was to assess the reliability of a smartphone-based electrocardiography device in the measurement of QT andcorrected QT intervals in children.METHODS: In all participants, 10-s smartphone electrocardiography tracing from AliveCor device and a standard 12-leadelectrocardiograph were obtained simultaneously. Two pediatric electrophysiologists performed the measurements of QT andcorrected QT intervals in a blinded manner with Bazett’s formula. The results were compared statistically.RESULTS: A total of 285 children (mean age 9.8±4.9 years) who presented to our clinic were included in the study. Themean QT intervals obtained from 12-lead electrocardiographs and AliveCor devices were 343±40 ms and 340±41 ms, respectively. The mean corrected QT intervals obtained from 12-lead electrocardiographs and AliveCor devices were 419±28 ms and415±33 ms, respectively. There was high correlation between the QT intervals of 12-lead electrocardiographs and AliveCorrecordings (Pearson’s correlation coefficient: 0.83 [p

🔖

Cite This Article

KARACAN, M., AKDENİZ, C., ÇELİK, N., TUZCU, V., GÜL, E. E. (2022). Validation of a smartphone-based electrocardiography in the screening of QT intervals in children. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 48–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/652024

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Moss AJ, Schwartz PJ, Crampton RS, Tzivoni D, Locati EH, MacCluer J, et al. The long QT syndrome. Prospective longitudinal study of 328 families. Circulation 1991
  2. 1136–44. [CrossRef ] 2. Nemec J, Hejlik JB, Shen WK, Ackerman MJ. Catecholamine-induced T-wave lability in congenital long QT syndrome: A novel phenomenon associated with syncope and cardiac arrest. Mayo Clin Proc 2003
  3. 40–50. [CrossRef ] 3. Stramba-Badiale M, Crotti L, Goulene K, Pedrazzini M, Mannarino S, Salice P, et al. Electrocardiographic and genetic screening for long QT syndrome: Results from a prospective study on 44,596 neonates. Circulation 2007
  4. 116 Suppl:II377. 4. Quaglini S, Rognoni C, Spazzolini C, Priori SG, Mannarino S, Schwartz PJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of neonatal ECG screening for the long QT syndrome. Eur Heart J 2006
  5. 1824–32. [CrossRef ] 5. Zupancic JA, Triedman JK, Alexander M, Walsh EP, Richardson DK, Berul CI, et al. Cost-effectiveness and implications of newborn screening for prolongation of QT interval for the prevention of sudden infant death syndrome. J Pediatr 2000
  6. 481–9. [CrossRef ] 6. Saul JP, Schwartz PJ, Ackerman MJ, Triedman JK. Rationale and objectives for ECG screening in infancy. Heart Rhythm 2014
  7. 2316–21. 7. Rodday AM, Triedman JK, Alexander ME, Cohen JT, Ip S, Newburger JW, et al. Electrocardiogram screening for disorders that cause sudden cardiac death in asymptomatic children: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2012
  8. e999–1010. [CrossRef ] 8. Saxon LA, Smith A, Doshi S, Dinsdale J, Albert D. iPhone rhythm strip the implications of wireless and ubiquitous heart rate monitoring. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012
  9. E726. [CrossRef ] 9. Ferdman DJ, Liberman L, Silver ES. A smartphone application to diagnose the mechanism of pediatric supraventricular tachycardia. Pediatr Cardiol 2015
  10. 1452–7. [CrossRef ] 10. Lowres N, Neubeck L, Redfern J, Freedman SB. Screening to identify unknown atrial fibrillation. A systematic review. Thromb Haemost 2013
  11. 213–22. [CrossRef ] 11. Nguyen HH, Van Hare GF, Rudokas M, Bowman T, Silva JN. SPEAR trial: Smartphone pediatric electrocARdiogram trial. PLoS One 2015
  12. e0136256. [CrossRef ] 12. Bazett JC. An analysis of time relations of electrocardiograms. Heart 1920
  13. 353–67. 13. Maron BJ, Friedman RA, Kligfield P, Levine BD, Viskin S, Chaitman BR, et al. Assessment of the 12-lead ECG as a screening test for detection of cardiovascular disease in healthy general populations of young people (12-25 years of age): A scien