SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

The efficacy of the electric patient hoist systems in mobilization

Levent ÖZGÖNENEL
Zeynep ERDOĞAN İYİGÜN
Tomris DUYMAZ
Pages
361–367
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Mobility was assessed using the clinical and Rivermeadmobility indexes while daily activities were evaluated with the Barthel index.RESULTS: Our results indicated that the hospitalization duration decreased significantly in the patients practicing withEPHS in comparison with the controls (p=0.014).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: Long-term immobilization brings about physiological and biomechanical adverse effects on organs and systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For enabling patients to stand on their feet and to be mobilized in the early period, electric patient hoist system (EPHS)accelerates the recovery of systemic functions and allows the patient with neurological diseases to become independent.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Mobility was assessed using the clinical and Rivermeadmobility indexes while daily activities were evaluated with the Barthel index.RESULTS: Our results indicated that the hospitalization duration decreased significantly in the patients practicing withEPHS in comparison with the controls (p=0.014).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Long-term immobilization brings about physiological and biomechanical adverse effects on organs and systems. For enabling patients to stand on their feet and to be mobilized in the early period, electric patient hoist system (EPHS)accelerates the recovery of systemic functions and allows the patient with neurological diseases to become independent. Thisstudy aimed to investigate whether EPHS differs from conventional systems in the duration of hospitalization, mobility leveland return to activities of daily living by analyzing patients mobilized with EPHS in the early period.METHODS: We analyzed 30 patients with neurological diseases, who were aged 50-75 years and immobile for more than oneweek. The patients were divided into two groups as EPHS patients and controls. Before and after the treatment, we recordedage, height, weight, hospitalization duration and time of mobilization. Mobility was assessed using the clinical and Rivermeadmobility indexes while daily activities were evaluated with the Barthel index.RESULTS: Our results indicated that the hospitalization duration decreased significantly in the patients practicing withEPHS in comparison with the controls (p=0.014). When the groups were compared regarding the pre- and post-treatmentoutcomes of the clinical and Rivermead mobility indexes, the mobility levels of the EPHS group showed more considerableimprovement (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGÖNENEL, L., İYİGÜN, Z. E., DUYMAZ, T. (2022). The efficacy of the electric patient hoist systems in mobilization. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 361–367. https://ajindex.com/articles/652019

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Czell D, Schreier R, Rupp R, Eberhard S, Colombo G, Dietz V. Influence of passive leg movements on blood circulation on the tilt table in healthy adults. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004
  2. [CrossRef ] 2. Dietz V, Müller R, Colombo G. Locomotor activity in spinal man: significance of afferent input from joint and load receptors. Brain 2002
  3. 2626–34. [CrossRef ] 3. Gill TM, Gahbauer EA, Murphy TE, Han L, Allore HG. Risk factors and precipitants of long-term disability in community mobility: a cohort study of older persons. Ann Intern Med 2012
  4. 131–40. 4. Hardy SE, Kang Y, Studenski SA, Degenholtz HB. Ability to walk 1/4 mile predicts subsequent disability, mortality, and health care costs. J Gen Intern Med 2011
  5. 130–5. [CrossRef ] 5. Newman AB, Simonsick EM, Naydeck BL, Boudreau RM, Kritchevsky SB, Nevitt MC, et al. Association of long-distance corridor walk performance with mortality, cardiovascular disease, mobility limitation, and disability. JAMA 2006
  6. 2018–26. [CrossRef ] 6. Gill TM, Han L, Allore HG. Predisposing factors and precipitants for bathing disability in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007
  7. 534–40. 7. Greer N, Brasure M, Wilt TJ. Wheeled mobility (wheelchair) service delivery: scope of the evidence. Ann Intern Med 2012
  8. 141–6. 8. Jackson AB, Carnel CT, Ditunno JF, Read MS, Boninger ML, Schmeler MR, et al. Outcome measures for gait and ambulation in the spinal cord injury population. J Spinal Cord Med 2008
  9. 487–99. [CrossRef ] 9. Mathieson KM, Kronenfeld JJ, Keith VM. Maintaining functional independence in elderly adults: the roles of health status and financial resources in predicting home modifications and use of mobility equipment. Gerontologist 2002
  10. 24–31. [CrossRef ] 10. Krause JS, Carter RE, Brotherton S. Association of mode of locomotion and independence in locomotion with long-term outcomes after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2009
  11. 237–48. [CrossRef ] 11. Baer GD, Salisbury LG, Smith MT, Pitman J, Dennis M. Treadmill training to improve mobility for people with sub-acute stroke: a phase II feasibility randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2018
  12. 201– 12. [CrossRef ] 12. Miranda Rocha AR, Martinez BP, Maldaner da Silva VZ, Forgiarini Junior LA. Early mobilization: Why, what for and how? Med Intensiva 2017
  13. 429–36. [CrossRef ] 13. Olkowski BF, Shah SO. Early Mobilization in the Neuro-ICU: How Far Can We Go? Neurocrit Care 2017
  14. 141–50. [CrossRef ] 14. De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Lefaucheur JP, Authier F