SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Our clinic’s first experience with HoLEP

Kenan Yigit YILDIZ
Serkan DOĞAN
Pages
355–360
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ourcomplications rates were correlated with the literature.CONCLUSION: HoLEP stands out as a surgical method that can be applied with high confidence in the treatment of benignprostatic hyperplasia and it has similar functional results to gold standard surgeries, causes fewer complications, improvespatient comfort due to short catheterization and hospitalization and is more advantageous regarding cost.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACTOBJECTIVE: The present study reports a retrospective evaluation of the first Holmium laser prostate enucleation (HoLEP)cases and their results in our clinic.METHODS: Twenty four patients who underwent HoLEP surgery between April 2017 and November 2017 were evaluated fordemographic characteristics, duration of operation, amount of hemorrhage, amount of energy used, tissue weight removed,catheterization time and complications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There was a significant difference in IPSS, Qmean and hemoglobin values but not in Qmax, statistically.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ourcomplications rates were correlated with the literature.CONCLUSION: HoLEP stands out as a surgical method that can be applied with high confidence in the treatment of benignprostatic hyperplasia and it has similar functional results to gold standard surgeries, causes fewer complications, improvespatient comfort due to short catheterization and hospitalization and is more advantageous regarding cost.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

ABSTRACTOBJECTIVE: The present study reports a retrospective evaluation of the first Holmium laser prostate enucleation (HoLEP)cases and their results in our clinic.METHODS: Twenty four patients who underwent HoLEP surgery between April 2017 and November 2017 were evaluated fordemographic characteristics, duration of operation, amount of hemorrhage, amount of energy used, tissue weight removed,catheterization time and complications. IPSS and uroflowmetry results were compared before and after the surgery.RESULTS: Patients with hemoglobin, IPSS, uroflowmetry, and voiding speeds (Qmean, Qmax) were compared before andafter the surgery. There was a significant difference in IPSS, Qmean and hemoglobin values but not in Qmax, statistically. Ourcomplications rates were correlated with the literature.CONCLUSION: HoLEP stands out as a surgical method that can be applied with high confidence in the treatment of benignprostatic hyperplasia and it has similar functional results to gold standard surgeries, causes fewer complications, improvespatient comfort due to short catheterization and hospitalization and is more advantageous regarding cost.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, K. Y., DOĞAN, S. (2022). Our clinic’s first experience with HoLEP. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 355–360. https://ajindex.com/articles/652013

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Patel ND, Parsons JK. Epidemiology and etiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia and bladder outlet obstruction. Indian J Urol 2014
  2. 170– 6. [CrossRef ] 2. AUA Practice Guidelines Committee. AUA guideline on management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (2003). Chapter 1: Diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 2003
  3. 530–47. [CrossRef ] 3. Kuntz RM. Current role of lasers in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Eur Urol 2006
  4. 961–9. [CrossRef ] 4. Gilling PJ, Cass CB, Cresswell MD, Fraundorfer MR. Holmium laser resection of the prostate: preliminary results of a new method for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1996
  5. 48–51. 5. Gilling PJ, Kennett K, Das AK, Thompson D, Fraundorfer MR. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) combined with transurethral tissue morcellation: an update on the early clinical experience. J Endourol 1998
  6. 457–9. [CrossRef ] 6. Elzayat EA, Habib EI, Elhilali MM. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a size-independent new “gold standard”. Urology 2005
  7. 108–13. 7. Michalak J, Tzou D, Funk J. HoLEP: the gold standard for the surgical management of BPH in the 21(st) Century. Am J Clin Exp Urol 2015
  8. 36–42. 8. Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Emberton M, Gravas S, Michel MC, et al. EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 2013
  9. 118–40. [CrossRef ] 9. Hochreiter WW, Thalmann GN, Burkhard FC, Studer UE. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate combined with electrocautery resection: the mushroom technique. J Urol 2002
  10. 1470–4. [CrossRef ] 10. Hurle R, Vavassori I, Piccinelli A, Manzetti A, Valenti S, Vismara A. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation in 155 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 2002
  11. 449–53. [CrossRef ] 11. Kuntz RM, Lehrich K. Transurethral holmium laser enucleation versus transvesical open enucleation for prostate adenoma greater than 100 gm.:: a randomized prospective trial of 120 patients. J Urol 2002
  12. 1465–9. [CrossRef ] 12. Das A, Kennett K, Fraundorfer M, Gilling P. Holmium laser resection of the prostate (HoLRP): 2-year follow-up data. Tech Urol 2001
  13. 252–5. 13. Gilling P, Kennett K, Fraundorfer MR. Holmium laser resection v transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a randomized trial with 2 years of follow-up. J Endourol 2000
  14. 757–60. [CrossRef ] 14. Rasswei