Journals / IOJET / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

ACADEMICIANS’ VIEWS ON DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN EDUCATION

Journal
IOJET
Pages
809–830
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is recommended that educational administrators and program specialists be ready for this transformation and have the qualities to manage this transformation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is seen that changing information and communication technologies affect and even transform things in almost every area of the digital age that we have in conjunction with Industry 4.0 and globalization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The working group consists of 20 faculty members working at 9 different universities in the Department of Educational Sciences.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is recommended that educational administrators and program specialists be ready for this transformation and have the qualities to manage this transformation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

It is seen that changing information and communication technologies affect and even transform things in almost every area of the digital age that we have in conjunction with Industry 4.0 and globalization. These rapid changes and transformations in the world affect education both as a structure and as learning environments. One of these values has been the digital transformation. As the increasing use of technology in every day and learning environments, now most of the students are born to a digital world. In this context, this study was designed with a phenomenological research design as the qualitative approach in order to determine academics' views on digital transformation in education in terms of program and management processes. The working group consists of 20 faculty members working at 9 different universities in the Department of Educational Sciences. The data were collected with a semi-structured interview form. Results reveal that in the digital transformation process, managers must first create a vision to generate and managed accordingly for an effective learning environment. According to another result, it is possible that school shareholders are involved in this transformation process by letting them access the place and time by supporting content and infrastructure which is technologically appropriate. It is recommended that educational administrators and program specialists be ready for this transformation and have the qualities to manage this transformation.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALYER, A., ÖZ, Ö. (2022). ACADEMICIANS’ VIEWS ON DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN EDUCATION. IOJET, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 809–830. https://ajindex.com/articles/651665

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Andreasen, L., B. & Christiansen, R., B. (2017). The transformation of teacher work through digital learning platforms. NERA Conference. Arık, G., Arslan, S., Çakır, M., & Kavak, Y. (2016). Fatih projesinin ulusal Ve uluslarasi eğitim teknoloji politikaları bağlamında değerlendirilmesi [The evaluation of the Fatih Project in the context of national and international educational technology policies]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 5(2), 308-321.
  2. Bağlıbel, M., Çetin, H., Özmantar, Z., K., & Samancıoğlu, M. (2015). Okul yöneticilerinin eğitim yönetimi bilgi sistemlerine ilişkin görüşleri: Memnuniyet, algılanan fayda ve göreve uygunluk arasındaki ilişki [School administrators’ opinions regarding to educational management information systems: The relationship among satisfaction, perceived usefulness and task fit]. Balıkesir University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 18(34), 193-212.
  3. Balay, R. (2004). Küreselleşme, bilgi toplumu ve eğitim [Globalisation, information society and education]. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 37(2), 61-82.
  4. Bates, T. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning for a digital age. Retrieved on February 16, 2018 from https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/
  5. Baysal, İ. (2015). Endüstri 4.0 [Industry 4.0], Pricewaterhousecoopers (PWC) Turkey. Retrieved on March 17, 2018 from https://www.okul.pwc.com.tr/images/uploadfile/content/635863141496551266.pdf
  6. Çelik, M., Y. (2012). Boyutları ve farklı algılarıyla küreselleşme [Globalization with different perceptions and dimensions]. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 32(2), 57-74.
  7. Coşkun, V. (2003). Küreselleşme: tanımı ve dinamikleri [Globalisation: Definitions and dynamics]. Journal of Arkaplan International Politics, 7, 16-28. Eğitim Bilişim Ağı [Education Informatics Network] (EBA) (2018). EBA hakkında [About EBA]. Retrieved on March 22, 2018 from http://www.eba.gov.tr/hakkimizda
  8. Fırat, Ü. S. & Fırat, Z. O. (2017). Sanayi 4.0 devrimi üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme: Kavramlar, küresel gelişmeler ve Türkiye [A comparative study on industrial revolution 4.0: Concepts, global developments and Turkey.]. The Journal of Toprak İşveren 114, 10-23.
  9. Hermann, M., Pentek, T., & Otto, B. (2015). Design principles for industries 4.0 scenarios: A literature review. Working Paper, 1, Technische Universitat, Dortmund. Kaçmazoğlu, H., B. (2002). Doğu batı çatışması açısından globalleşme [Globali