Journals / Göztepe Tıp Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

The relationship between vertebral fraktures and qulity of life in patients with osteoporosis

Osteoporoz hastalarında vertebral fraktür sıklığı ve yaşam kalitesi ile ilişkisi

Pages
20–24
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, any meaningful relationship was found between vertebralfracture and quality of life in patients with primary osteoporosis with the instrument of SF-36.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Vertebral fractures cause poor quality of life due to the backpain, functional limitations, and loss of utility.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ouality of life wasassessed by Short-Form 36 (SF-36).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, any meaningful relationship was found between vertebralfracture and quality of life in patients with primary osteoporosis with the instrument of SF-36.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Vertebral fractures cause poor quality of life due to the backpain, functional limitations, and loss of utility. Therefore, theeffects of vertebral fractures on quality of life is an importantclinical issue. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence andthe effects of vertebral fractures on quality of life in seventypatients with osteoporosis. Bone mineral density were performed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Ouality of life wasassessed by Short-Form 36 (SF-36). Spine radiographs wereused to evaluate the existence of vertebral fracture. Primaryand secondary osteoporosis were determined in 52.9 % and47.1 % of the patients, respectively. Vertebral fractures weredetermined in 7 (18.9 %) patients with primary osteoporosisand in 6 (18.2 %) patients with secondary osteoporosis. Whenscores of SF-36 subgroups were compared, there was no statistically significant difference between the patients with andwithout vertebral fractures in primary osteoporosis. In conclusion, any meaningful relationship was found between vertebralfracture and quality of life in patients with primary osteoporosis with the instrument of SF-36.

Özet

Vertebral fraktürler sırt ağrısı, fonksiyonel kısıtlılıklar ve işgücü kayıplarına bağlı olarak yaşam kalitesini olumsuz etkileyebilir. Bu nedenle vertebral fraktürlerin yaşam kalitesi üzerine etkisi önemli bir klinik durumdur. Çalışmamızda, osteoporoz tedavisi alan hastalarda vertebra kırığı sıklığının ve vertebral kırığın yaşam kalitesi üzerine etkisinin araştırılmasıamaçlandı. Polikliniğimizde osteoporoz tanısıyla takip vetedavi edilen 70 hasta çalışmaya alındı. Dual enerji X-rayabsorbsiyometri ile kemik mineral yoğunluğu, direkt grafilerile vertebra kompresyon kırığı varlığı ve Kısa Form-36(SF-36) ölçeğiyle yaşam kalitesi değerlendirildi. Primer osteoporoz (PO) 37 (% 52.9) ve sekonder osteoporoz (SO) 33 (%47.1) hastada tespit edildi. PO’lu 7 (% 18.9), SO’lu 6 (% 18,2)hastada vertebra kırığı saptandı. Vertebra fraktürü olan veolmayan PO’lu hastalar karşılaştırıldığında SF-36 ölçeğininalt grupları arasında fark bulunmadı. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışmada vertebral fraktürlerin yaşam kalitesi üzerine etkisi sap- tanmamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOKTAŞ, H., KAVUNCU, V., SOLAK, Ö., DEMİRDAL, Ü. S., DÜNDAR, Ü., YİĞİT, İ. (2022). The relationship between vertebral fraktures and qulity of life in patients with osteoporosis. Göztepe Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 20–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/651095

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Hagino H, Nakamura T, Fujiwara S, et al.Sequential change in quality of life for patients with incident clinical fractures: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 2009;20(5):695-702
  2. Papaioannou A, Courtney CK, Ioannidis G, et al. Determinants of health-related quality of life in women with vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 2006;17(3):355-363
  3. Roux C, Fechtenbaum J, Kolta S, et al. Mild prevalent and incident vertebral fractures are risk factors for new fractures. Osteoporos 2007;18 (12):1617-1624
  4. Fink HA, Ensrud KE, Nelson DB, et al. Disability after clinical fracture in postmenopausal women with low bone density: the fracture intervention trial (FIT). Osteoporos Int 2003;14(1):69-76
  5. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, et al. Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2004;15(1):38-42
  6. Ethgen O, Tellier V, Sedrine WB, et al. Health-related quality of life and cost of ambulatory care in osteoporosis: how may such outcome measures be valuable information to health decision makers and payers?. Bone 2003;32(6):718-724
  7. Melton LJ III, Atkinson EJ, Cooper C, et al.Vertebral fractures predict subsequent fractures. Osteoporos Int 1999;10(3):214-221
  8. Fechtenbaum J, Cropet C, Kolta S, et al. The severity of vertebral fractures on health-related quality of life in osteoporot i c pos t -menopaus a l women. Os t eoporos Int 2005;16(12):2175-2179
  9. Adachi JD, Ioannidis G, Olszynski WP, et al. The impact of incident vertebral and non-vertebral fractures on health related quality of life in postmenopausal women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2002;22;3:11
  10. Lems WF, Jahangier ZN, Raymakers JA, et al. Methods to score vertebral deformities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1997;36(2):220-224
  11. Basaran S, Rengin G, Sarpeli T. Yaşam Kalitesi ve Sağlık Sonuçlarını Değerlendirme Anketi. Romatizma 2005;20(1):55-62. 12.Ware JE. SF-36 Heal th Survey Update. Spine 2000;25(24):3130-3139
  12. Suzuki N, Ogikubo O, Hansson T. The course of the acute vertebral body fragility fracture: its effect on pain, disability and quality of life during 12 months. Eur Spine J 2008;17(10):1380-1390
  13. Van Schoor NM, Ewing SK, O’Neill TW, et al. Impact of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures on utility: results from a patient-based and a population-based sample. Qual Life Res 2008;17(1):159-167
  14. Roy DK, O’Neill TW, Finn JD, et al. Determinants of incident vertebral fracture in men and women: results from the European Prospective Osteop