Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2021 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of Three Different Learning Methods of Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network for Wind Speed Forecasting

Pages
439–454
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the results obtained, it was seen that the SCG algorithm gave better results in tests in this study with less data.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the world, electric power is the highest need for high prosperity and comfortable living standards.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, ensuring the security of electricity supply requires accurate estimates of electricity demand.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the results obtained, it was seen that the SCG algorithm gave better results in tests in this study with less data.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the world, electric power is the highest need for high prosperity and comfortable living standards. The security of energy supply is an essential concept in national energy management. Therefore, ensuring the security of electricity supply requires accurate estimates of electricity demand. The share of electricity generation from renewables is significantly growing in the world. This kind of energy types are dependent on weather conditions as the wind and solar energies. There are two vital requirements to locate and measure specific systems to utilize wind power: modelling and forecasting of the wind velocity. To this end, using only 4 years of measured meteorological data, the present research attempts to estimate the related speed of wind within the Libyan Mediterranean coast with the help of ANN (artificial neural networking) with three different learning algorithms, which are Levenberg-Marquardt, Bayesian Regularization and Scaled Conjugate Gradient. Conclusions reached in this study show that wind speed can be estimated within acceptable limits using a limited set of meteorological data. In the results obtained, it was seen that the SCG algorithm gave better results in tests in this study with less data.

🔖

Cite This Article

BULUT, M., TORA, H., BUAISHA, M. (2022). Comparison of Three Different Learning Methods of Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network for Wind Speed Forecasting. Gazi University Journal of Science, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 439–454. https://ajindex.com/articles/650916

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Pinson, P., Nielsen, H.A., Madsen, H., Kariniotakis, G., “Skill forecasting from ensemble predictions of wind power”, Applied Energy, 86 (7–8): 1326–34, (2009)
  2. Watson, S.J., Landberg, L., Halliday, J.A., “Application of wind speed forecasting to the integration of wind energy into a large scale power system”, IEE Proc. Gen. Transm. Distrib., 141(4): 357–62, (1994)
  3. Torres, J., Garcia, A., Deblas, M., Defrancisco, A., “Forecast of hourly average wind speed with ARMA models in Navarre (Spain)”, Sol. Energ, 79(1): 65–77, (2005)
  4. Lin, L., Eriksson, J.T., Vihriala, H., Soderlund, L., “Predicting wind behavior with neural Networks”, In Proceeding the 1996 European wind energy conference, Sweden, 655–8, (1996)
  5. Beyer, H.G., Degner, T., Haussmann, J., Homan, M., Rujan P., “Short term forecast of wind speed and power output of a wind turbine with neural Networks”, In: Proceeding the second European congress on intelligent techniques and soft computing. Germany, (1994)
  6. Kariniotakis, G., Stavrakakis, G.S., Nogaret, E.F., “Wind power forecasting using advanced neural network model”, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 11(4): 762–7, (1996)
  7. Kariniotakis, G., Stavrakakis G.S., Nogaret, E.F., “A fuzzy logic and neural network-based wind power model”, In: Proceeding the 1996 European wind energy conference, Sweden, 596–9, (1996
  8. Celik, A.N., “Energy output estimation for small-scale wind power generation using Weibull representative wind data”, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 91(5): 693 -707, (2003)
  9. Oztopal, A., Kahya, C., Sahin, A.D., “Wind speed modelling with artificial neural network”, 3. National Clean Energy Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, 415-422, (2000)
  10. Kalogirou, S.A., “Artificial neural networks in renewable energy systems applications: a review”, Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev., 5: 373–401, (2001)
  11. Sahin, A.D., Sen, Z., “Spatial normal distribution graphics methodology in western part of Anatolia”, II. National Clean Energy Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, (1997)
  12. Sirdas, S., “Daily wind speed harmonic analysis for Marmara region in Turkey”, Energy Conversion Manage., 46 (7- 8): 1267 – 127, (2005)
  13. Sen, Z., “Terrain topograph classification for wind energy generation”, Renew. Energy, 16: 904 – 907, (1999)
  14. Matheron, G., “Principles of geostatistics”, Econ Geol., 58: 1246 -1266, (1963)
  15. Krige, D.G., “A statistical approach to some basic mine evaluation problems on the Witwateround”, J. Chimie. Min. Soc. South Af