Journals / Gazi University Journal of Science / 2021 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1

A Comparison Analysis of Fuzzy and Bayesian Linear Model Parameter Estimates for Replicated Response Measures

Pages
251–270
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Two data sets from the literature, which were called Roman Catapult and Printing Ink, were used and the obtained results were discussed in application part.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is possible to define functional relationship between replicated response measures and input variables by using fuzzy and Bayesian modeling approaches.
📊
Key Findings & Data:And also, interval type residuals were calculated to see the performance of predicted fuzzy and Bayesian models for making clear comparison.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Two data sets from the literature, which were called Roman Catapult and Printing Ink, were used and the obtained results were discussed in application part.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

It is possible to define functional relationship between replicated response measures and input variables by using fuzzy and Bayesian modeling approaches. The main aim of the study is to present the alternative usability of fuzzy modeling approach to Bayesian modeling approach with defining a proper alpha-cut level among the many alpha-cut levels. In this study, the uncertainty of estimated model parameters were compared by transforming the estimated parameter values to intervals. Interval valued parameter estimates were obtained through alpha-cut level presentation and credible intervals for fuzzy and Bayesian approaches, respectively. Thus, it was achieved to model the replicated response measured (RRM) data set without making any probabilistic modeling assumptions which were hard to satisfy for small sized RRM data set. To compare the interval valued model parameter estimates in the proposed study, midpoint, width, radius and Hausdorff metrics were used. And also, interval type residuals were calculated to see the performance of predicted fuzzy and Bayesian models for making clear comparison. Two data sets from the literature, which were called Roman Catapult and Printing Ink, were used and the obtained results were discussed in application part.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKŞEN, Ö. (2022). A Comparison Analysis of Fuzzy and Bayesian Linear Model Parameter Estimates for Replicated Response Measures. Gazi University Journal of Science, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1, 251–270. https://ajindex.com/articles/650896

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Khuri, A. I., Mukhopadhyay, S., “Response surface methodology”, WIREs Computational Statistics, 2:128-149, (2010)
  2. Zadeh, L. A., “The concept of a Linguistic variable and applications to approximate reasoning-part-I, II, III”, Information Science, 8:199-249, (1975)
  3. Lai, Y. J., Chang, S., “A fuzzy approach for multi response optimization: An off-line quality engineering problem”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 63:117−129, (1994)
  4. Akbar, M. S., Otok, B. W., Prastyo, D. D., “Fuzzy modeling approach and global optimization for dual response surface”, Jurnal Teknik Industri, 9:102−111, (2007
  5. Xie, H., Lee, Y. C., “Process optimization using a fuzzy logic response surface method”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology-Part A, 17 (1994)
  6. Prasad, K., Nath, N., “Comparison of sugarcane juice based beverage optimisation using response surface methodology with fuzzy method”, Sugar Tech., 4:109−115, (2002)
  7. Xu, R., Dong, Z., “Fuzzy modeling in response surface method for complex computer model based design optimization”, Proc. 2nd IEEE/ASME Int. Conf. Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications, 1−6, (2006)
  8. Bashiri, M., Hosseininezhad, S. J., “A fuzzy programming for optimizing multi-response surface in robust designs”, Journal of Uncertain Systems, 3:163−173, (2009)
  9. Bashiri, M., Hosseininezhad, S. J., “Fuzzy development of multiple response optimization”, Group Decision and Negotiation 21:417-438, (2012)
  10. Türkşen, Ö., Güler, N., “Comparison of fuzzy logic based models for the multi-response surface problems with replicated response measures”, Applied Soft Computing, 37:887-896, (2015)
  11. Türkşen, Ö., “Analysis of Response Surface Model Parameters with Bayesian Approach and Fuzzy Approach”, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 24:109- 122, (2016)
  12. Türkşen, Ö., “A Fuzzy Modeling Approach for Replicated Response Measures Based on Fuzzification of Replications with Descriptive Statistics and Golden Ratio”, Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 22:153-159, (2018)
  13. Steinberg, D. M., “A Bayesian Approach to Flexible Modeling of Multivariable Response Functions”, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 34:157-172, (1990)
  14. Chen, Y., “Bayesian Hierarchical Modelling of Dual Response Surfaces”, Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, (2005)
  15. Chen, Y., Ye, K., “Bayesian Hierarchical Modell