Journals / Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1

STUDENT DIFFICILTIES ABOUT CALCULATING ACCELARATION OF MULTIPLE COMPONENT SYSTEMS

ÇOK PARÇALI MEKANİK SİSTEMLERDE İVME HESAPLAMA PROBLEMLERİNDE ÖĞRENCİ GÜÇLÜKLERİ

Pages
1–22
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that most students used an erroneous technique for calculating acceleration in multi-object mechanic systems regardless of gender, class and type of school.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate students difficulties related to calculating acceleration for multi- object systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:DQS was administered to 377 high school students in 6 different high schools in Nigde province.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that most students used an erroneous technique for calculating acceleration in multi-object mechanic systems regardless of gender, class and type of school.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to investigate students difficulties related to calculating acceleration for multi- object systems. Dynamic Question Set (DQS) was developed by authors and used as a data collection tool. DQS was administered to 377 high school students in 6 different high schools in Nigde province. DQS solutions were analysed according to the praxeological organization. The distributions of solution were analysed according to variables such as gender, type of high school and class. The findings indicate that most students used an erroneous technique for calculating acceleration in multi-object mechanic systems regardless of gender, class and type of school. This technique called as focused technique is to focus on the object we ask to calculate its acceleration and to ignore the rest of the mechanical system. The findings also show that this technique did not appear under special circumstances and was not specific to a group of students.

Özet

Bu çalışma, çok parçalı mekanik sistemlerde ivme hesaplama problemlerinde öğrencilerin karşılaştıkları güçlükleri tespit etmek için yapılmıştır. Bu amaçla yazarlar tarafından geliştirilen Dinamik Soru Seti, Niğde il merkezinde altı farklı lisede öğrenim gören toplam 377 öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. DSSden toplanan veriler prakseolojik olarak analiz edilerek öğrencilerin ivme bulma probleminde kullandıkları teknikler ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Bulgular, öğrencilerin büyük bir çoğunluğunun cinsiyet, sınıf ve okul türü fark etmeksizin çok parçalı mekanik sistemlerde ivme hesaplama problemlerini çözerken onları hatalı çözüme götüren odak tekniği kullandıklarını göstermiştir. Araştırmada toplanan veriler odak tekniğin, özel şartlar altında ortaya çıkmış, bir grup öğrenciye özgü, özel bir teknik olmadığını göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEMİZ, B. K., YAVUZ, A. (2022). STUDENT DIFFICILTIES ABOUT CALCULATING ACCELARATION OF MULTIPLE COMPONENT SYSTEMS. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 1, 1–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/650762

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Bolton, J., & Ross, S. (1997). Developing students’ physics problem-solving skills. Physics Education, 32, 176. Balcı, A. (2004). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntem, teknik ve ilkeleri. Ankara:
  2. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Chevallard, Y. (1992). Fundamental concepts in didactics: Perspectives provided by an anthropological approach. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 12(1), 131-168.
  3. Chevallard, Y. (1997). Familière et problématique, la figure du professeur. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 17(3), 17-54.
  4. Chevallard, Y. (1999). L’analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques 19(2), 221–266. Chevallard, Y. (2007). Readjusting Didactics to a Changing Epistemology. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2). Compton, C. A. (1970). Exercises are not problems. The Physics Teacher, 8, 235–240. Çalışkan, S., Selçuk, G. S., & Erol, M. (2012). Instruction of problem solving strategies: Effects on physics achievement and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 9(1). Dumas-Carré, A. (1981). Les controles en question. Bulletin de l’Union des Physiciens, 632, 865-869. Dumas-Carré, A., & Goffard, M. (1997). Rénover les activités de résolution de problémes en physique. Paris: Armand Colin/Masson. Guillaud, J.C. (1998). Enseignement et apprentissage du concept de force en classe de Troisième (Doktora tezi). Université Jospeh Fourier Grenoble 1 France. Hallouna, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985). Common sense concepts about motion. Am. J. Phys, 53(11), 1056–1065. Hobden, P. (1998). The Role of Routine Problem Tasks in Science Teaching. International handbook of science education, 1, 219. Jonassen, D. H. (2010). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Routledge. Karasar, N. (1994). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: 3A Araştırma Eğitim Danışmanlık Ltd. Leonard, W. J., Dufresne, R. J., & Mestre, J. P. (1996). Using qualitative problem- solving strategies to highlight the role of conceptual knowledge in solving problems. Am. J. Phys., 64, 1495-150.
  5. McDermott, L. C., Shaffer, P. S., & Somers, M. D. (1994). Research as a guide for teaching introductory mechanics: An illustration in the context of the Atwood’s machine. Am. J. Phys., 62(1), 46–55. McGinn, M. K., & Boote, D. N. (2003). A first-person perspective on problem solving in a history of mathematics course. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 71–107. Mestre, J. P.,