SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Journal of Therapeutics / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of Urinary Incontinence Subgroups according to Possible Risk Factors

Mehmet SOLAKHAN
Hatem KAZIMOĞLU
Yunus Emre TOPDAĞI
Ali İrfan GÜZEL
Pages
225–228
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Parity, episiotomy,DM status, delivery type, menopause status, hysterectomy history, and BMI differed significantly among the groups (allp

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Urinary incontinence (UI) is involuntary urine flow that causes social and hygienic problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We compared the risk factors based on UI subtypes.Methods: The study included 470 women with different UI types (320 urge UI [UUI], 80 stress UI [SUI], and 70 mixed UI [MUI]).Age, educational level, urban/rural residence, parity, delivery type, diabetes mellitus (DM), and hypertension status, anyneurological abnormality, menopausal status, surgical history, and body mass index (BMI) were obtained.Results: Of all women, 320, 80, and 70 had UUI, SUI, and MUI, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Parity, episiotomy,DM status, delivery type, menopause status, hysterectomy history, and BMI differed significantly among the groups (allp
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Urinary incontinence (UI) is involuntary urine flow that causes social and hygienic problems. The association between risks factors and UI in women was assessed. We compared the risk factors based on UI subtypes.Methods: The study included 470 women with different UI types (320 urge UI [UUI], 80 stress UI [SUI], and 70 mixed UI [MUI]).Age, educational level, urban/rural residence, parity, delivery type, diabetes mellitus (DM), and hypertension status, anyneurological abnormality, menopausal status, surgical history, and body mass index (BMI) were obtained.Results: Of all women, 320, 80, and 70 had UUI, SUI, and MUI, respectively. The groups did not differ significantly in terms ofage, hypertension status, neurological abnormality rate, smoking status, or surgical history (all p>0.05). Parity, episiotomy,DM status, delivery type, menopause status, hysterectomy history, and BMI differed significantly among the groups (allp

🔖

Cite This Article

SOLAKHAN, M., KAZIMOĞLU, H., TOPDAĞI, Y. E., GÜZEL, A. İ. (2022). Comparison of Urinary Incontinence Subgroups according to Possible Risk Factors. European Journal of Therapeutics, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 225–228. https://ajindex.com/articles/650470

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C, et al. Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2010
  2. [Crossref] 2. Wein AJ. Pathophysiology and categorization of voiding dysfunction. In Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED (eds)Campbell's Urology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 2002
  3. Minassian V. Drutz H. Al-Badr A. Urinary incontinence: a worldwide problem. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2003
  4. [Crossref] 4. Hayek S. Abrams P. Women's lower urinary tract function and dysfunction: definitions and epidemiology. Minerva Gynecol 2004
  5. Goode PS, Burgio KL, Redden DT, Markland A, Richter HE, Sawyer P, et al. Population based study of incidence and predictors of urinary incontinence in black and white older adults. J Urol 2008
  6. [Crossref] 6. Lukacz ES, Santiago-Lastra Y, Albo ME, Brubaker L. Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Review. JAMA 2017
  7. [Crossref] 7. Markland AD, Goode PS, Burgio KL, Redden DT, Richter HE, Sawyer P, et al. Correlates of urinary, fecal, and dual incontinence in older African-American and white men and women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008
  8. [Crossref] 8. Smith AL, Wang PC, Anger JT, Mangione CM, Trejo L, Rodríguez LV, et al. Correlates of urinary incontinence in community-dwelling older Latinos. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010
  9. [Crossref] 9. Tennstedt SL, Link CL, Steers WD, McKinlay JB. Prevalence of and risk factors for urine leakage in a racially and ethnically diverse population of adults: The Boston Area Community Health (BACH) Survey. Am J Epidemiol 2008
  10. [Crossref] 10. Basak T, Uzun S, Arslan F. Incontinence features, risk factors, and quality of life in Turkish women presenting at the hospital for urinary incontinence. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2012
  11. [Crossref] 11. Firth D. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika 1993
  12. [Crossref] 12. Tsai Y-C, Liu CH. Urinary incontinence among Taiwanese women: An outpatient study of prevalence, co morbidity, risk factors, and quality of life. Int Urol Nephrol 2009
  13. [Crossref] 13. Onur R, Deveci SE, Rahman S, Sevindik F, Acik Y. Prevalence and risk factors of female urinary incontinence in eastern Turkey. Int J Urol 2009
  14. [Crossref] 14. Chiarelli P, Brown