SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

-

ULUSLARARASI TİCARET VE KÜLTÜREL YAKINLIK: ASYA ÖRNEĞİ

Ünal ARSLAN
Pages
89–101
Publication Date
2015-03-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This means cultural proximity/similarity effects the international trade in long run

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the relationship between culture proximity and international trade in Asia, covering the period 1970-2009 using Pedroni and Johansen and Fisher Panel Data cointegration tests.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The result of the cointegration analysis indicates that there is a long-run relationship between culture and and international trade.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This means cultural proximity/similarity effects the international trade in long run
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kültürel Benzerlik · Uluslararası Ticaret · Panel Data Analizi

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between culture proximity and international trade in Asia, covering the period 1970-2009 using Pedroni and Johansen and Fisher Panel Data cointegration tests. The result of the cointegration analysis indicates that there is a long-run relationship between culture and and international trade. This means cultural proximity/similarity effects the international trade in long run

Özet

Bu çalışma, 1970-2009 yılları arası, Pedroni ve Johansen ve Fisher panel veri eş bütünleşme analizi kullanılarak Asya ülkelerinde kültürel benzerlik ve uluslararası ticaret arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmıştır. Eş bütünleşme analizi, Asya ülkelerinde, kültü- rel benzerlik ve uluslararası ticaret arasında, uzun dönemli bir ilişkinin var olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu durum, uzun dönemde kültürel yakınlığın uluslararası ticareti etkilediği anlamına gelmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, Ü. (2015). -. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 89–101. https://ajindex.com/articles/6495

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Axelrod, R. (1984),
  2. The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books. Balaam David N., Bradford Dillman (2013). Introduction to International Political Economy, 6th Edition,
  3. Beckerman, W. “Distance and The Pattern of Intra-European Trade”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1956, 38:31-40.
  4. Boyd, Robert and Richerson, P. (1985)
  5. Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Chicago: Univesity of Chicago Press. Breitung J., “The local power of some unit root tests for panel data”, Advances in Econometrics, 2000, 15, 161-177.
  6. Coase, Ronald, “The Nature of The Firm”, Economica, 1937 Vol. 4, No. 16, 386-405.
  7. Combes, Pierre-Philippe, Miren Lafourcade Thierry Mayer, “The trade-creating effects of business and social networks: evidence from France”, Journal of International Economics, 2004 66, pp.1 –29. Cyrus, Teresa L., “Cultural Distance and Bilateral Trade”, Global Economy Journal. 2011, Volume 12, Issue 4. Dreher, A “Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization”. Applied Economics, 2007,vol. 38, No.10, pp. 1091-1110.
  8. Dreher, Axel, Martin Gassebner, Lars-H. R. Siemers, “Globalization, Economic Freedom, and Human Rights” 2012
  9. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 56, No. 3 (June 2012), pp. 516-546.
  10. Felbermayr, Gabriel J., Toubal F., “Cultural proximity and trade”, European Economic Review, 2010 Volume 54, Issue 2, 279–293.
  11. Frankel, J., Stein, E., Wei, S.-J., Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System. Institute for International Economics, 1997, Washington DC. Gert-Jan M. Linders Arjen Slangen Henri L.F. de Groot Sjoerd Beugelsdijk “Cultural and Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Flows”, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 2005, No. 05-074/3 Glaeser, Edward, David Laibson, and Bruce Sacerdote (2002), “An Economic Approach to Social Capital,” Economic Journal, 2002, 112: 437-458.
  12. Granger, C.W.J., ve Newbold, P., “Spurious Regression in Economics”, Journal of Econometrics, 1974, vol. 2, Issue 2, 111-120
  13. Greif, Avner, Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy, 2006,
  14. Cambridge. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., “Does culture affect economic outcomes”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2006, 20 (2), 23–48.
  15. Guiso, Luigi, Paola Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales, “Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 2009, 124 (3), 1095-1131.
  16. Guo, Rongxing, ”How culture influences foreign trade: evidence from the U.S. and China”, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2004, 33, 785–812.
  17. Hadri, K.,