Journals / Bilimsel Madencilik Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 3

Turbulence models and simulation method in the CFD simulation of 75-mm hydrocyclone

Pages
127–134
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By drawing the partition curve, it is possible to select a hydrocyclone with low bypassing of fine particles and high classification efficiency.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, an effective method for the classification process simulation in 75mm hydrocyclone is considered.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result, it is confirmed that when an appropriate simulation method is applied with the LES-WMLES S-Omega model, more accurate axial water flow velocity distribution and particle classification simulation results can be obtained at a computational cost similar to that of using the RSM model.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By drawing the partition curve, it is possible to select a hydrocyclone with low bypassing of fine particles and high classification efficiency.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this paper, an effective method for the classification process simulation in 75mm hydrocyclone is considered. The simulation results and computational time are compared using Reynolds stress model (RSM) and different large eddy simulation (LES) subgrid-scale models as turbulence models. The Lagrangian discrete phase model (DPM) is used to simulate the classification process of particles. As the experimental result for comparison of simulation results, Hsieh's experimental data are used. When the different LES subgrid-scale models are used, the solution converges stably by various solution convergence methods without increasing the grid numbers or reducing the size of time steps than RSM model. As a result, it is confirmed that when an appropriate simulation method is applied with the LES-WMLES S-Omega model, more accurate axial water flow velocity distribution and particle classification simulation results can be obtained at a computational cost similar to that of using the RSM model. By drawing the partition curve, it is possible to select a hydrocyclone with low bypassing of fine particles and high classification efficiency.

🔖

Cite This Article

KANG, S. G., KİM, K. C., RYOM, S. C., Rİ, J. H. (2022). Turbulence models and simulation method in the CFD simulation of 75-mm hydrocyclone. Bilimsel Madencilik Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 3, 127–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/649124

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Brennan, M.S., Narasimha, M., Holtham, P.N. 2007. Multiphase modelling of hydrocyclones - prediction of cut-size. Minerals Engineering 20, 395- 406. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2006.10.010. Cui, B., Zhang, C., Wei, D., Lu, S., Feng, Y. 2017. Effects of feed size distribu- tion on separation performance of hydrocyclones with different vortex finder diameters. Powder Technology 322, 114-123. doi:10.1016/j. powtec.2017.09.010. Delgadillo, J.A., Rajamani, R.K. 2005. A comparative study of three turbu- lence - closure models for the hydrocyclone problem. International journal of mineral processing 77(4), 217-230. doi:10.1016/j.min- pro.2005.06.007. Delgadillo, J.A. 2006. Modelling of 75- and 250-mm hydrocyclones and ex- ploration of novel designs using computational fluid dynamics Ph.D. thesis. Utah: The University of Utah. Delgadillo, J.A., Rajamani, R.K. 2007. Exploration of hydrocyclone designs using computational fluid dynamics. International Journal of Mineral Processing 84, 252-261. doi:10.1016/j.minpro.2006.07.014. Delgadillo, J.A., Rajamani, R.K. 2009. Computational fluid dynam- ics prediction of the air-core in hydrocyclones. Internation- al Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 23(2), 189-197. doi:10.1080/10618560902724893. Ghadirian, M., Hayes, R.E., Mmbaga, J., Afacan, A., Xu, Z. 2013. On the simu- lation of hydrocyclones using CFD. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 91(5), 950-958. doi:10.1002/cjce.21705. Ghodrat, M., Qi, Z., Kuang, S.B., Ji, L., Yu, A.B. 2016. Computational inves- tigation of the effect of particle density on the multiphase flows and performance of hydrocyclone. Minerals Engineering 90, 55-69. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2016.03.017. Hsieh, K.T. 1988. Phenomenological model of the hydrocyclone. Ph.D. the- sis. Utah: The University of Utah. Jiang, L., Liu, P., Zhang, Y., Yang, X., Wang, H., Gui, X. 2019. Design boundary layer structure for improving the particle separation performance of a hydrocyclone. Powder Technology 350, 1-14. doi:10.1016/j.pow- tec.2019.03.026. Kuang, S.B., Chu, K.W., Yu, A.B., Vince, A. 2012. Numerical study of liq- uidgas-solid flow in classifying hydrocyclones: Effect of feed solids concentration. Minerals Engineering 31, 17-31. doi:10.1016/j.mi - neng.2012.01.003. Li, Y., Liu, C., Zhang, T., Li, D., Zheng, L. 2018. Experimental and Numerical Study of a Hydrocyclone with the Modification of Geometrical Struc- ture. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 96, 2638-2649. doi:10.1002/cjce.23206. Mangadoddy