SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

EXTERNAL DETERMINANTS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: PANEL DATA ANALYSIS

Ali ŞEN
Mehmet Şentürk
Gökçen ÖZKAN
Engin Ducan
Pages
15–28
Publication Date
2015-03-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to results of both three co-integration tests, variables are co-integrated; hence there is a long-term relationship between them

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effects of some exogenous determinants on GDP growth in Brasil, India, China, South Africa and Turkey are analysed over the period 19702011.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, current account, export, foreign direct investments and energy import are chosen as exogenous determinants of GDP growth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to results of both three co-integration tests, variables are co-integrated; hence there is a long-term relationship between them
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gelişmekte olan ülkeler · doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar · cari açık

Abstract

In this study, the effects of some exogenous determinants on GDP growth in Brasil, India, China, South Africa and Turkey are analysed over the period 19702011. In this context, current account, export, foreign direct investments and energy import are chosen as exogenous determinants of GDP growth. Firstly, stationary of variables are tested by using LLC and IPS panel unit root tests. Then, existence of long-term relationship between series is analyzed by using Pedroni, Kao and Jhansen Fisher panel co-integration tests. According to results of both three co-integration tests, variables are co-integrated; hence there is a long-term relationship between them

Özet

In this study, the effects of some exogenous determinants on GDP growth inBrasil, India, China, South Africa and Turkey are analysed over the period 1970-2011. In this context, current account, export, foreign direct investments and energy import are chosen as exogenous determinants of GDP growth. Firstly, stationary of variables are tested by using LLC and IPS panel unit root tests. Then, existence of long-term relationship between series is analyzed by using Pedroni, Kao and Jhansen Fisher panel co-integration tests. According to results of both three co-integration tests, variables are co-integrated; hence there is a long-term relationship between them.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEN, A., Şentürk, M., ÖZKAN, G., Ducan, E. (2015). EXTERNAL DETERMINANTS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: PANEL DATA ANALYSIS. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 15–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/6491

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. ADAMS, Gerard F., Yasukazu Ichino, and Peter A. Prazmowski, “Economic Growth and Energy Import Requirements: An Energy Balance Model of Thailand”, Journal of Policy Modelling, Vol: 22, Issue: 2, 2000, s. 219-254.
  2. ALTUNKAYNAK, Bulent, “Sektörel Panel Veri Analizi Yaklaşımıyla Türkiye’nin AB Ülkelerine İmalat Sanayi Bakımından İhracatının Belirlenmesi”, Gazi University Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, 2007,
  3. Ankara.
  4. BAI, Jushan, and Serena, N.G, “A Panic Attack on Unit Roots and Cointegration”, Econometrica, Vol: 72, Issue: 4, 2004, s. 1127-1277.
  5. BALAT, Mustafa, “Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Turkey During the Past Two Decades”, Energy Policy, Vol: 36, 2008, s. 118-127.
  6. BENGOA, Marta, and Blanca, Robles-Sanchez, “Foreign Direct Investment Economic Freedom and Growth: New Evidence from Latin America”, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol: 19, 2003, s. 529-545.
  7. BREITUNG, Jörg, “The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data”, Advances in Econometrics, Vol: 15, Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, ed. B. H. Baltagi, 2000, s. 161–178. Amsterdam: JAY Press.
  8. BREITUNG, Jörg, and Samarjit, Das, “Panel Unit Root Tests Under Cross Sectional Dependence”, Statistica Neerlandica, Vol: 59(4), 2005, s. 414-433.
  9. CHOI, In, “Unit Roots Tests for Panel Data”, Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol: 20, 2001, s. 249–272.
  10. EICHENGREEN, Barry, Rachita, Gullapalli, and Ugo, Panizza, “Capital Account Liberalization”, Development and Industry Growth: A Synthetic View, 2009, http://polis.unipmn.it/pubbl/RePEc/uca/ucapdv/panizza144.pdf. (Access Date: 05.05.2011).
  11. GHOSH, Sajal, “Electricity Supply, Employment and Real GDP in India: Evidence from Cointegration and Granger-Causality Tests”, Energy Policy, Vol: 37, Issue: 8, 2009, s. 2926-2929.
  12. GOURINCHAS, Pierre Olivier, and Jeanne, Olivier, “Capital Flows to Devoloping Countries: The Allocation Puzzle”, NBER Working Paper Series, No. 13602, 2007.
  13. GUTIERREZ, Luciano, “Tests for Cointegration in Panels with Regime Shifts”, Econometrics, No: 0505007, 2005.
  14. GUVENEK, Burcu, and Volkan, Alptekin, “Enerji Tüketimi ve Büyüme İlişkisi: OECD Ülkelerine İlişkin Bir Panel Veri Analizi”, Enerji, Piyasa ve Düzenleme, Cilt: 1, Sayı: 2, 2010, s. 172-193.
  15. HADRI, Kaddour, “Estimation of a Doubly Heteroscedastic Stochastic Frontier Cost Function”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol: 17, 1999, s. 359-363.
  16. HARRIS, Richard D. F., and Ellias, Tzavalis, “Inference for Unit Roots in Dynamic P